you were and still are confused. why should i post this in another thread when we're talking about two different topics? rapidsnail is discussing about faith and i'm talking about the logic of his question.
you were and still are confused. why should i post this in another thread when we're talking about two different topics? rapidsnail is discussing about faith and i'm talking about the logic of his question.
If you think about it, your question and his question are really the same question -or, rather, one question must be asked along with the other. This really *does* belong in the other thread 
Originally posted by: Nik
If you think about it, your question and his question are really the same question -or, rather, one question must be asked along with the other. This really *does* belong in the other thread
my qeustion is really simple, how can people argue about a non-valid question all the time?
this is a wake up call for people like you. people who are overly zealous in proclaiming his/her belief without taking a closer look at the question. you should say in ur first post in that thread, the question is invalid, there's nothing to talk about, period. instead, you're here arguing with me about the choice of a smiley. i have great respect for you.
Originally posted by: McGyver
Originally posted by: Nik
If you think about it, your question and his question are really the same question -or, rather, one question must be asked along with the other. This really *does* belong in the other thread
my qeustion is really simple, how can people argue about a non-valid question all the time?
this is a wake up call for people like you. people who are overly zealous in proclaiming his/her belief without taking a closer look at the question. you should say in ur first post in that thread, the question is invalid, there's nothing to talk about, period. instead, you're here arguing with me about the choice of a smiley. i have great respect for you.
I do it because I'm really tired and your boring, retarded nonsense is helping put me to sleep. Thanks, man.
:moon:
'Faith' is nothing more than belief in a shared delusion. If you were the only one who believed in this god being, you'd have to have pretty strong 'faith' to continue believing it despite being on your own. The fact that there's millions of others who share the delusion makes it easier to believe in the fantasy. People want to believe because it's comforting to feel that you don't have to take complete control over your life as well as the obvious comforting factor of there being an afterlife.
It's a delusion. The bible was altered and twisted in order to maintain control over the people. Religion is interesting to observe, but I regard it the same way you may be interested in egyptology: facinating, but certainly belongs in the past with people of a less advanced nature.
/religious threads
It's a delusion. The bible was altered and twisted in order to maintain control over the people. Religion is interesting to observe, but I regard it the same way you may be interested in egyptology: facinating, but certainly belongs in the past with people of a less advanced nature.
/religious threads
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: McGyver
Originally posted by: Nik
If you think about it, your question and his question are really the same question -or, rather, one question must be asked along with the other. This really *does* belong in the other thread
my qeustion is really simple, how can people argue about a non-valid question all the time?
this is a wake up call for people like you. people who are overly zealous in proclaiming his/her belief without taking a closer look at the question. you should say in ur first post in that thread, the question is invalid, there's nothing to talk about, period. instead, you're here arguing with me about the choice of a smiley. i have great respect for you.
I do it because I'm really tired and your boring, retarded nonsense is helping put me to sleep. Thanks, man.
:moon:
is that a concession? lol
:thumbsup: hey, analyse these.
yhelothar
Lifer
- Dec 11, 2002
- 18,409
- 39
- 91
Hahaha, that's actually quite true. My last ex was a pretty devout christian, and one of her main reasons for believing in god was that when she feels helpless(like always), she can pray for god to help take over. She was one of the most passive people I've ever met in dealing with problems. Proof of how religion can easily harm someone.
The bible as a whole may never be proven, but bits and pieces of it have been, while other parts, though not necessarily proven, almost *have* to be true; the stories appear in different cultures all over the world.
For example, a pair of cities, long ago destoyed by a volcano, may well have been the basis for Soddom and Gamorrah (sp?). The wreckage of a boat may well rest somewhere up on Mount Ararat, and there is other evidence of a universal or near-universal flood event. This is just off the top of my head; I'm sure there's other stuff, as well.
Nate
For example, a pair of cities, long ago destoyed by a volcano, may well have been the basis for Soddom and Gamorrah (sp?). The wreckage of a boat may well rest somewhere up on Mount Ararat, and there is other evidence of a universal or near-universal flood event. This is just off the top of my head; I'm sure there's other stuff, as well.
Nate
Just go through the Bible and look for passages that contradict each other. You'll find several. This is in a sense "disproving" the Bible. In science, if a scientific theory contains two conflicting assets, then it is disproven.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter