I don't think it's a case of fault. Bush had the opportunity before leaving to start something with his DOJ and didn't, Obama chose to let them off the hook, you don't have Congress clamoring for prosecution. The biggest problem here is that Obama had the opportunity to make the perpetrators of fraud pay for all the people whose lives they ruined, and chose not to. The reason for this is the same as the reason for why we did the bail outs in the first place, fear. The government was afraid of shaking up the financial market too much, so instead of doing what's right they did what they thought they had to. I understand the reasoning, but I dislike the outcome.
Sorry but that's a whole lot of crap.
No one is irreplaceable.
Financial stability obviously does not rest on shoulders of these financial wizzards, and is not held together by their immense brain power. Else there would be no meltdown, would it?
Administration could have guaranteed financial stability and solvency with a fucking communist decree like they had already done with bailout.
By sending few thousand fraud committing bankers, managers, and Wall Street execs to be pounded in their arseholes till the end of their prison term,
Administration and DoJ would, if anything, reassure investors and the public that their money is handled responsibly.
So yeah conscious decision on part of Obama not to prosecute (as admitted by Lanny Breuer).
Nothing to do with "stability of financial market".