• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The United States has Israel`s back......

JEDIYoda

Lifer
A very interesting read!!!
Yet we all knew that if push comes to shove and Israel gets in trouble the US would do everyt5hing the can to bail them out!

I don`t have the article but I read some where that we have equipped i\Israel with out most formidable bombs just in case Israel does decide to go it alone!!


http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hil...israels-back-urges-patience-on-iran-sanctions

President Obama reaffirmed his staunch commitment to Israel on Sunday, making clear in no uncertain terms that “I have Israel’s back.” But, at the same time, he urged Israel and its supporters to allow time for diplomacy and “crippling” sanctions on Iran to take hold to halt Tehran’s nuclear program.

Addressing the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the influential pro-Israel lobby group, Obama tried to reassure the crowd of 13,000 people, who initially greeted him with a lukewarm response, by saying that if Iran fails to meet its obligations and the problem remains, “we must accomplish our objective.”


“Iran’s leaders should know that I do not have a policy of containment, I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” Obama said, drawing hearty applause from the crowd. “And as I’ve made clear time and again during the course of my presidency, I will not hesitate to use force when it is necessary to defend the United States and its interests.”

During his address, which comes one day before he sits down with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Obama sought time and again to reassure Israel and its supporters that he will do whatever it takes to help defend the country.

“Over the last three years, as President of the United States, I have kept my commitments to the state of Israel,” Obama said. “At every crucial juncture, at every fork in the road, we have been there for Israel. Every single time.”

The president added that “whenever an effort is made to de-legitimize the state of Israel,” his administration has opposed it.


”We will do what it takes to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge – because Israel must always have the ability to defend itself, by itself, against any threat,” Obama added.


The president has faced criticism from GOP lawmakers concerned his 2013 budget proposal fails to devote enough aid to Israel in light of the threat from Iran.

“There should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back,” he said.

At the same time, Obama called for patience, saying that as commander in chief, he has a “deeply-held preference” for peace over war.

“I have sent men and women into harm’s way. I have seen the consequences of those decisions in the eyes of those I meet who have come back gravely wounded, and the absence of those who don’t make it home. Long after I leave this office, I will remember those moments as the most searing of my presidency," he said. "For this reason, as part of my solemn obligation to the American people, I only use force when the time and circumstances demand it."

Republicans though have been critical about Obama’s approach with Iran, attempting to find a weakness in his foreign policy track record, which has been bolstered by the killing of Osama bin Laden.

On Sunday, before Obama’s speech began, the Republican National Committee, slammed the president, sending an e-mail to reporters with the subject line: “Another AIPAC, Another reminder of Broken Promises.”

GOP presidential candidates have accused Obama of weakening the U.S. relationship with Israel.

"If Barack Obama gets reelected, Iran will have a nuclear weapon, and the world will change if that's the case," Romney said in Georgia, following Obama's speech.

Romney said Obama had "failed to put into place crippling sanctions against Iran.”

"He's also failed to communicate that military options are on the table and in fact in our hand. And that it's unacceptable to America for Iran to have a nuclear weapon," he said. "I will have those military options, I will take those crippling sanctions and put them into place, and I will speak out to the Iranian people of the peril of them becoming nuclear. It's pretty straight-forward in my view."

On Sunday, appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich said he doubts Obama’s commitment to Israel.

“I mean, we're being played for fools,” Gingrich said. “You have every evidence that this administration is desperately trying to get the Israelis not to preempt, and, frankly, an Israeli prime minister faced with the threat of nuclear arms in Iran is going to preempt.”

GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum said recently that the U.S is “throwing Israel under the bus.”

"We're going to say, 'Oh, Iran, we don't want you to get a nuclear weapon — wink, wink, nod, nod — go ahead, just give us your oil.' Folks, the president of the United States is selling the economic security of the United States down the river right now," Santorum said during a speech in Oklahoma City last month.

Appearing at the AIPAC conference in a roundtable, Liz Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, drew big applause from the audience after she said that the Obama administration has done more to “delegitimize” and undermine Israel.

Obama railed against his critics in his speech on Sunday reminding the crowd, “during this political season, [when] you hear some question my administration’s support for Israel, remember that it’s not backed up by the facts.”

“And remember that the U.S.-Israel relationship is simply too important to be distorted by partisan politics,” he continued. “America’s national security is too important. Israel’s security is too important.”

At the conference, Israeli President Shimon Peres, who spoke on Sunday, thanked Obama “for being such a good friend.”

In his speech, Peres said Obama will “never permit Iran to become nuclear.”

“Dear friends, the United States and Israel share the same goal of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon,” Peres added, "I know your commitment to Israel is deep and profound."

After Obama wrapped up his speech, he spent more than 30 minutes talking to Peres backstage, a White House official said, adding that it was not a formal bilateral meeting. Obama also congratulated Peres on the Medal of Freedom, which he will present to the Israel leader this summer.

On Sunday, before a meeting with Jewish leaders in Ottawa, Prime Minister Netanyahu said he "very much appreciated" that Obama "reiterated his position that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and that all options are on the table.”

"I also appreciated the fact that he made clear that when it comes to a nuclear armed Iran, containment is simply not an option, and equally in my judgment, perhaps most important of all, I appreciated the fact that he said that Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat," Netanyahu said.

"I appreciate all his statements and I look forward to discussing them further with President Obama tomorrow."

Netanyahu's government has said time is running out for a military strike against Iran that would prevent the Islamic republic from developing nuclear weapons, something Israel sees as an existential threat.

The two leaders are said to have a tense relationship. The last time they sat down together at the White House, in July, Netanyahu appeared to lecture Obama on the history of Israel before a gaggle of television cameras.

But in an interview with The Atlantic last week, Obama called their relationship “functional” and if nothing else brutally honest.

“I actually think the relationship is very functional, and the proof of the pudding is in the eating,” Obama said in the interview. “The fact of the matter is, we've gotten a lot of business done with Israel over the last three years. I think the prime minister — and certainly the defense minister —would acknowledge that we've never had closer military and intelligence cooperation."

In the days leading up to the AIPAC conference, Obama sought to make his position on Iran clear.

In the Atlantic interview, Obama tried to reassure Israel, putting forth an I-say-what-I-mean attitude, while sending a warning to both Iran and Israel.

"I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don't bluff,” Obama said. "I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say.”


Reaction to the president's speech was mixed. Some attendees said Obama struck the right tone, explaining exactly where he stands on Iran and making his commitment to Israel well-known. "He needed to hit this right," said one attendee who is actively involved in US-Israel relations.

On Sunday, AIPAC's spokesman Patrick Dorton said in a statement: "We welcome the president's remarks and his strong resolve to work with Israel to solve the Iranian challenge."


Outside the conference, which took place at the Washington Convention Center, about 100 demonstrators protested various causes. Some held signs reading "Stop funding Israel terror. "No War on Iran," read another.
 
This is a complete reversal of his anti-Israel stance of the last three years. I don't believe him for a single second and I doubt Netanyahu does either.

I dont forget the smack down Netanyahu gave Obama a year or so ago, and neither should Americans or Israelis either. Obama is playing politics and the 180 proves it.
 
Last edited:
This is a complete reversal of his anti-Israel stance of the last three years. I don't believe him for a single second and I doubt Netanyahu does either.

I dont forget the smack down Netanyahu gave Obama a year or so ago, and neither should Americans or Israelis either. Obama is playing politics and the 180 proves it.

We will see.....
 
Wow, a presidential candidate pandering to a significant demographic in an election year. Well stop the fucking presses. 🙄
 
Wow, a presidential candidate pandering to a significant demographic in an election year. Well stop the fucking presses. 🙄

Especially how he lost the Jew vote as evidenced by the ny congressional seat to a republican for the first time in 50+ years in special election.

Don't forget this presidents anti-semitism. Don't forget.
 
We created Israel, of course we would back them... and that is just the beginning of why the middle east hates us.
 
Especially how he lost the Jew vote as evidenced by the ny congressional seat to a republican for the first time in 50+ years in special election.

Don't forget this presidents anti-semitism. Don't forget.
How could we forget? The voices in your head are so loud I sometimes hear them from South Carolina.
 
Especially how he lost the Jew vote as evidenced by the ny congressional seat to a republican for the first time in 50+ years in special election.

Don't forget this presidents anti-semitism. Don't forget.

I know relations between President Obama and BiBi have been a bit on the cold side, but you honesdtly think he is anti-semetic?
 
Your paranoia is the gift that keeps on giving.

Faux outrage by a non jew.

My father is Jewish, my brother full on hasidic. I'm close enough to know what Jews think of this president.

All you have are insults.

As said this complete reversal of his policies, words, deeds, and actions are proof enough. He's pandering. May fuck be upon him.
 
This is a complete reversal of his anti-Israel stance of the last three years. I don't believe him for a single second and I doubt Netanyahu does either.

I dont forget the smack down Netanyahu gave Obama a year or so ago, and neither should Americans or Israelis either. Obama is playing politics and the 180 proves it.


Said the same thing to Georgia before they got hammered by Putkin.
 
My father is Jewish, my brother full on hasidic. I'm close enough to know what Jews think of this president.

All you have are insults.

As said this complete reversal of his policies, words, deeds, and actions are proof enough. He's pandering. May fuck be upon him.

No, actually, I was brought up jewish. So, that means more than your anecdotes of knowing people.
 
The UK created the modern state of Israel, with the UN's blessing.

Yes, the UK, but the US was influential and backed the whole thing.. they also recognized Israel first too.

And the UK conquered the land called Israel... not "created." If WE back the attack/conquering, it is cool...
 
My father is Jewish, my brother full on hasidic. I'm close enough to know what Jews think of this president. -- I am also even closer than you......I can tell you that they are split right down the middle! But I will also tell you that we do not need the United States. I have always been of the opinion that they need us a lot more than we need them!

All you have are insults.

As said this complete reversal of his policies, words, deeds, and actions are proof enough. He's pandering. May fuck be upon him.

I would agree that he is pandering up to a point...
But with that said -- I can guarantee you that if Israel were to attack Iran and something major were to happen that the United States would step in to lend there ally Israel a hand!


So your not Jewish?? Your brother was birthed by a different woman than your present father?
 
No, actually, I was brought up jewish. So, that means more than your anecdotes of knowing people.

So are you Jewish or not......
Just because you were brought up Jewish does NOT mean you are Jew.....
Had you read what Spidey posted knowing your family who it would appear are jewish says a lot more than you being brought up a Jew...
 
Some additional analysis by the BBC's Mark Mardell: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17254302

Makes sense to me:
The argument between BO and Bibi is not really about the pros and cons of war. It is about how you define success. Or failure. What are the red lines that must not be crossed?

Mr Obama notes pointedly that "the United States and Israel both assess that Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon," for that is his red line.

Israel's red line, and that of many speakers at the conference, is different.

It is when Iran has enough enriched uranium to build a bomb, something that could happen much sooner than putting the whole thing together.
 
Back
Top