• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Tulsi Disgrace

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Fanatical Meat said:
You are getting beat up in here.
I don’t picture you voting for a Tulsi, maybe if that was your absolute last choice you would.
Just seems strange being so attached to Tulsi when you’d likely never vote for her.
Are you doing it to be apart from the herd?
Click to expand...
Starbuck is actually a pretty thoughtful fellow. I enjoy his take on political issues. I don't think I've ever seen him get angry or offended, quality poster all the way around.
 
fskimospy said:
Except that’s not her explanation for why she voted present, lol. She has said nothing about the contents of the articles of impeachment and that has nothing to do with her vote. You’re defending her and you don’t even know why. It’s hard for me to think of a way to prove Vic was right more thoroughly than that.

thehill.com

Gabbard defends ‘present’ vote on impeachment: Voters should decide

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), a 2020 White House hopeful, on Thursday defended her decision to vote “present” on impeaching President Trump, which sparked a wave of backlash from Democrats.Gabbard…
thehill.com thehill.com

Her explanation was that because the process was partisan she wouldn’t vote for the articles even though she thinks he is guilty. This means she has outsourced her vote to Republicans - so long as they remain partisan she won’t vote to convict.

It’s hard to think of a position less principled and more cowardly than that.
Click to expand...

Yeh, we should wag our fingers & give him a stern rebuke. That'll whip him into line!

What Trump attempted becomes more horrifying the more I think about it. What if Zelensky had knuckled under, hooked up with Giuliani & Barr as Trump suggested? Headlines-

Crusading Ukrainian President announces corruption investigation into Joe Biden!

DoJ cooperating in Biden Probe!

It's profoundly wrong, nefarious and shameful in ways unimagined before Trump.
 
Greenman said:
Starbuck is actually a pretty thoughtful fellow. I enjoy his take on political issues. I don't think I've ever seen him get angry or offended, quality poster all the way around.
Click to expand...
I often enjoy your posts as well. None of these threads are worth getting angry or offended over.

I continue to enjoy debating with @fskimospy and respect @Jhhnn.
 
Greenman said:
Them russians sure know how to get the job done. It's amazing how they've taken control of everyone the left doesn't like.
Click to expand...

You're always eager to dismiss the pernicious effect their influence has on Americans. They pulled out the stops for 2016. And they'll obviously be back for 2020, given how well it worked. They're not in it for the MAGA, bet on that.

Add this to the catalogue of knowledge for you to ignore-

The Russia Tweets: Search and analyze 3 million Russian troll tweets
 
Jhhnn said:
You're always eager to dismiss the pernicious effect their influence has on Americans. They pulled out the stops for 2016. And they'll obviously be back for 2020, given how well it worked. They're not in it for the MAGA, bet on that.

Add this to the catalogue of knowledge for you to ignore-

The Russia Tweets: Search and analyze 3 million Russian troll tweets
Click to expand...

He knows nothing......absolutely nothing.....and wants to know nothing.....and is damned proud of it, too!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top