- Jul 19, 2001
- 38,572
- 2
- 91
Originally posted by: KeypoX
problem with that article is that they compare apple to retail pc prices. Who pays retail for pcs? IE: Dell seems to always have 400 off 1200 or something similar on there website.
Apple needs to take more of a price leader approach if they wanna be mainstream. I dunno if they want to be mainstream though. I feel so bad for people that believe everything they see or read.
Quick story, this girl in my stats class has a macbook. And this class is stats done via phstat (an excel addon) which is not compatiable with mac. I tried to help her run xp or vista via bootcamp or a vm. But she was so scared of viruses that she attempted the class by hand. While this is not impossible, it was a time management problem. Bottom line she gave up basically an easy B or A. And got a C. Because she is afraid of viruses.
Quick story, this girl in my stats class has a macbook. And this class is stats done via phstat (an excel addon) which is not compatiable with mac. I tried to help her run xp or vista via bootcamp or a vm. But she was so scared of viruses that she attempted the class by hand. While this is not impossible, it was a time management problem. Bottom line she gave up basically an easy B or A. And got a C. Because she is afraid of viruse
And that girl was just unfortunately stupid.
Another thing to think is that a lot of the parts on apple computers are not generic run of the mill shit so there's extra costs.
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Another thing to think is that a lot of the parts on apple computers are not generic run of the mill shit so there's extra costs.
Last time I looked they were pretty standard PC parts. Sure they use EFI instead of a normal BIOS to add some incompatibility but the hardware itself isn't anything special.
Well, yes and no. Since the switch to Intel, the argument is more valid, but there are plenty of instances where Apple has put into their systems part that no other vendors have access to, either temporarily, or ever. Look at the CPU in the Air for example. Or the MiniDisplayPorts on the MacBook/Pro now. The glass trackpad (or even the previous standard trackpad that had either 2 finger or full multitouch capabilities). The Sudden Motion Sensor, although no longer rare, is not exactly in use in every laptop made. I think all Lenovo Thinkpads have them, some of the Latitudes, and Vostros, and some others have them as well.
Originally posted by: Nothinman
I don't even know what's special about the CPU in the Air and the trackpad on my old ass Dell notebook that I can't even remember the model name of had multitouch.
Originally posted by: randomlinh
Originally posted by: Nothinman
I don't even know what's special about the CPU in the Air and the trackpad on my old ass Dell notebook that I can't even remember the model name of had multitouch.
It was a custom requested CPU made by apple... basically, it was first dibs on low powered small c2d chips. And multitouch on your old ass dell? I would like to know more about that, and to what extent it had it. I know a lot started to have the side/bottom scroll thing which was neat, but I have not seen anything close to Apple's implementation by others until recently.
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Another thing to think is that a lot of the parts on apple computers are not generic run of the mill shit so there's extra costs.
Last time I looked they were pretty standard PC parts. Sure they use EFI instead of a normal BIOS to add some incompatibility but the hardware itself isn't anything special.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
I don't have any idea why it happened, but I've become a complete Apple fanboy over the past year or so. I own an Ipod touch and a macbook, two things I never would have CONSIDERED owning a year ago. They're under-featured compared to competitor products, and while the Ipod touch is snazzy, I'd hardly call the Macbook (the white plastic variety) a shining beacon of stylish-ness.
The Apple tax article above is flawed because it's going by retail prices. You can always get a discount on PC products. You can almost NEVER find a good deal on new Mac products. Not to mention they leave out several glaring flaws, like the lack of a PC-Express card slot, or even a frigging SD card reader on the Mac products.
I don't do graphics-intensive work, think OSX vs. Vista is pretty much a draw at this point, and use my PC desktop 80% of the time anyway. People like me buy macs and pay the Apple Tax for the same reason people buy Mercurys instead of Fords: We're idiots who pay for a name only.
Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
I don't have any idea why it happened, but I've become a complete Apple fanboy over the past year or so. I own an Ipod touch and a macbook, two things I never would have CONSIDERED owning a year ago. They're under-featured compared to competitor products, and while the Ipod touch is snazzy, I'd hardly call the Macbook (the white plastic variety) a shining beacon of stylish-ness.
The Apple tax article above is flawed because it's going by retail prices. You can always get a discount on PC products. You can almost NEVER find a good deal on new Mac products. Not to mention they leave out several glaring flaws, like the lack of a PC-Express card slot, or even a frigging SD card reader on the Mac products.
I don't do graphics-intensive work, think OSX vs. Vista is pretty much a draw at this point, and use my PC desktop 80% of the time anyway. People like me buy macs and pay the Apple Tax for the same reason people buy Mercurys instead of Fords: We're idiots who pay for a name only.
I don't see what is idiotic about it. I prefer OS X over Vista. So what is my choice? Hackinstosh is more of a hobby thing to me. I like the real deal. To me, they are not a draw.
Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
That goes for anything. I'm sure if Porsche just started out with their prices they'd probably not make it as well. It's all speculation. It takes time to get to where companies are.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
The point I was trying to make is that if Apple were a startup company, and no one had ever heard of them, and these laptops were just now coming out, they'd be a complete failure. People are willing to pay what they do for Macs at least partially because of the "mystique" or whatever from owning them.
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
I don't understand the "brick" manufacturing. Seems like a huge waste of resources.
Originally posted by: randomlinh
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
The point I was trying to make is that if Apple were a startup company, and no one had ever heard of them, and these laptops were just now coming out, they'd be a complete failure. People are willing to pay what they do for Macs at least partially because of the "mystique" or whatever from owning them.
I highly doubt that. If some no name company came out with what the new macbooks are today, they would get noticed, fast. The fit and finish of first glance apple products is where apple has always had a strength (they have however, effectively kept their flaws fairly quiet). But they would have to have the build quality there, not just a knock off.
After holding a macbook air, there is simply nothing like it. Would I pay $1800 for one? no. But it is an amazing piece of hardware. I'm sure the new macbook/pros are the same. From what I've read, they are very nice, and the 'brick' process really does show.