• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You never confirmed if the reporter bears any responsibility for Signalgate. Because it would confirm your rush to infer the media was partly to blame vs this incompetent administration. Remember they were warned before the chat not to use Signal, but they did it anyway.

Your M.O. has never and will never change.

At the time of my original comments we didn't know who did what or even what was sent in the Signal App. Nor did I know that they were warned about the Signal App.

I was unaware that you needed my concurrence of if the reporter was to bare any responsibility.
 
I agree that Hegsheth was indeed contorting the facts to reduce culpability. Pete should be held accountable. The actual results of the accountability isn't my call.
Is "contorting the facts" Latin for lying?

Even in your rare admissions you still softball it for the Trump side. You will claim to wait for the facts but in the Tesla vandalism you go right to left wing terrorists when we have no evidence of it.

Could it be crazy left wingers? Maybe but it could easily be Tesla showrooms committing insurance fraud to recoup cratering sales.

I know for a fact the left are greatly discouraging violent acts because it is wrong, and it is bad for the cause. Right wingers promote violence. Did you see J6? We know it was his people despite them lying that it was Antifa.
 
Last edited:
Ok go.

I mean, u understand how that doesnt change anything. Im not a government employee conducting highly sensitive operations important to national security. Surely you understand the difference


I did check and I was pwned several times over the last decade... So what.

When was this data collected on them? Do you know? It could have been years ago when they didn't have anything to do with the government. Is any of this data passwords phone numbers etc... even current or still in use today? Is it old personal data or current Government data?

This is what it says in the article:

"Most of these numbers and email addresses are apparently still in use, with some of them linked to profiles on social media platforms like Instagram and LinkedIn. They were used to create Dropbox accounts and profiles in apps that track running data. There are also WhatsApp profiles for the respective phone numbers and even Signal accounts in some cases."

Looks like what could be looked on on about any private citizen. They should however dump / change those passwords and data. Clean things up better.

Surely YOU understand the difference.
 
I did check and I was pwned several times over the last decade... So what.

When was this data collected on them? Do you know? It could have been years ago when they didn't have anything to do with the government. Is any of this data passwords phone numbers etc... even current or still in use today? Is it old personal data or current Government data?

This is what it says in the article:

"Most of these numbers and email addresses are apparently still in use, with some of them linked to profiles on social media platforms like Instagram and LinkedIn. They were used to create Dropbox accounts and profiles in apps that track running data. There are also WhatsApp profiles for the respective phone numbers and even Signal accounts in some cases."

Looks like what could be looked on on about any private citizen. They should however dump / change those passwords and data. Clean things up better.

Surely YOU understand the difference.
Lol what am i to understand the difference of?

“Clean things up better” - lmao, ok champ, thats what theyre gonna do
 
Is "contorting the facts" Latin for lying?

Tesla vandalism you go right to left wing terrorists when we have no evidence of it.

Well not specifically Latin, but another way to say it. I thought that it was obvious. Maybe I'm giving you too much credit. 🙂


Could you please show me where I said that the Tesla vandalism was left wing terrorists? I'd love to read it. I know you won't.
 
Lol what am i to understand the difference of?

“Clean things up better” - lmao, ok champ, thats what theyre gonna do

The difference between their official data and an old email address / phone number or password they had years ago as a private citizen.
 
You will claim to wait for the facts but in the Tesla vandalism you go right to left wing terrorists when we have no evidence of it.

Could it be crazy left wingers? Maybe but it could easily be Tesla showrooms committing insurance fraud to recoup cratering sales.

I know for a fact the left are greatly discouraging violent acts because it is wrong, and it is bad for the cause. Right wingers promote violence. Did you see J6? We know it was his people despite them lying that it was Antifa.

Could you please show me where I said that the Tesla vandalism was left wing terrorists? I'd love to read it. I know you won't.

Not gonna answer my question?
 
The difference between their official data and an old email address / phone number or password they had years ago as a private citizen.

Ok, so you've verified its an old email address and they changed their passwords?

Because the quote you presented claims some of the stuff is still active.
 
Yes. I had never heard of the Signal App until this...

seriously..

who cares if you have have heard of this app or not.

you were in the military and you know the basic procedures on how to handle classified data.

not using your personal phone / apps to transmit classified is common sense when you are in the situation.

Any thing else is just trying to confuse the issue.

full stop.
 
Ok, so you've verified its an old email address and they changed their passwords?

Because the quote you presented claims some of the stuff is still active.

No. I haven't verified anything other than what the article says. And there is too little data to verify anything. Silly.

Still active doesn't mean it isn't Old. I have various accounts that are still active with passwords that I haven't been to or used for decades...
 
No. I haven't verified anything other than what the article says. And there is too little data to verify anything. Silly.

Still active doesn't mean it isn't Old. I have various accounts that are still active with passwords that I haven't been to or used for decades...
You know what a feeble mind is? Yours. You are given proof 2+2=4 and you scream it is 7 because you need more proof.

I love how you have moved on to email addresses to hijack thread.

The texts using signal had classified information with war plans. Full stop. Signal was not an allowed app to use per NSA and DoD. Full stop. This violated the Espionage Act. Full stop.

Reporter was added by National Security Advisor. Full stop.

Defense Secretary lied to America and said there were no War Plans. He lied. Full stop. The Gabbard lied to Congress. Full stop
 
Not gonna answer my question?

Shirley you ain't talking about right wing terrorists

First I didn't say anything about killing anyone.
How about those Black Nationalists? How many have they killed?

I don't have any Tesla Derangement Syndrome, that is just silly talk.

I think it is wrong to destroy innocent peoples property. And as I read your post's you are fine with terrorist actions against innocent people.

I hope you reap what you sow.
 
But wait, there’s more.

 

Shirley you ain't talking about right wing terrorists


If you would actually read the post you linked It didn't say anything about Right or Left Wing Terrorist.

It only called out "terrorist actions against innocent people".

But you have to make shit up as usual.

I don't know why I respond to the BS... I should know better.
 
No. I haven't verified anything other than what the article says. And there is too little data to verify anything. Silly.

Still active doesn't mean it isn't Old. I have various accounts that are still active with passwords that I haven't been to or used for decades...

“No i dont know anything, heres my uninformed opinion anyways”
 
Back
Top