Originally posted by: yukichigai
I doubt it is a matter of semantics. There are some dramatic differences between the King James bible and some of the other editions. (can't remember the names) Not to mention that some books are written in entirely different languages. One of them -- I think it's John -- was written in Ancient Greek... by a non-greek speaker. The opening is very pretty, but one reason why it's like that is because it is the biblical equivalent of "See spot. See spot run. Run spot, run."
Yes there are "dramatic" differences between the KJV and say the Living Bible. however, the Living Bible is considered a modern day, "meaning and intention" translation. Meaning its focus is to present a modern version of the MEANING and INTENT of the Bible and not a "direct" tranlsation. But it doesn't claim to be a direct translation, nor do people consider it thus.
