• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The sexualization of our kids

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I read the confidentiality agreement - it seems to be more about respect for your fellow students, and provides a blueprint for a better classroom learning environment. This agreement is signed by all students in a freshman life management type class - but I see no correlation that the agreement has anything specifically to do with homosexuality, but respect for you fellow students.

In this class, sexuality just happens to be one of the topics of discussion (heterosexuality, homosexuality, the broad spectrum). The book used in the class probably has a game card activity after every chapter/section, so to find one outlining common sexual terminology isn't surprising.

This same high school also had a prominent gay youth speaker visit, who has also written fictional books featuring characters who are growing up gay. He's a motivational speaker - it's not like he went into an assymbly trying to convert children. This assymbly was clearly about helping clear common misconception about gay people; it, without a doubt, gave support to the teens in the audience that are gay, but are not out of the closet.

They then go on to charge that Alex is somehow telling kids how to go to gay bars, with the title on the page being "GAY BARS FROM ALEX SANCHEZ WEB SITE" , even though they admit that the "?Student Resources? link on his website leads to the GLBT National Health Center where students can find listings of many local gay bars and clubs.......". So he has a link to another organizations website, and they are holding him responsible for the content that is not even on his website?!?!

They then take excerpts from a play from 2001 where students used expletives and talked about Jesus. They're High School students for Christ sake - I don't know how that really correlates to the topic of homosexual indoctrination...in fact...I don't see how any of this does. I feel like this whole scenario is being presented by the Society for the Argumentatively Inept. :roll:
 
I don't understand fundamentalists when they claim that there is a "gay agenda"... As if the gays are trying to convert people.

Just because you're pushy bastards who try to convert people to your religion doesn't mean gays are trying to convert people to homosexuality. It's not a religion, and not everyone in the world is as self centered and ugly as you.

 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.


Wow, thanks for clearing that up for us. It's really nice to hear your opinion. My opinion completely differs, but you don't care to hear my opinion. That much is obvious by you stating your opinion as if it were fact.


Also, what are your opinions on hand jobs? How do they fit in? What about heavy petting? It's all so very uncertain. Please clarify for us what is and what is not "sex" so that we can go about being abstinent in a way that is acceptable to you.
 
I stopped reading after I noticed your sources were WorldNutDaily and Freeper Central. Nice going. Why don't you just make up your own news stories, they'd be far more accurate.
 
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.

According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

But that's gay 😕
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.

According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

But that's gay 😕

Exactly, which is why it would upset them. 😛
 
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.


According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

What a tolerant person you are!

Oh and careful of your last comment...I had a week vacation for posting the same thing :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.


According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

What a tolerant person you are!

Oh and careful of your last comment...I had a week vacation for posting the same thing :laugh:

My tolerance and respect for neo-cons is about as strong as it is for white supremacists and fascists.

Know why...?

Because they don't deserve it.

Being intolerant of intolerance is an admirable trait, you don't need to put up with pigs and bigots to be a good person.

Also, if I get temp-banned for saying that, I'd understand. Not because I deserve it, no no. Mainly because I understand that blatant racism and bigotry is fine, as long as they don't say any curse words...
 
Originally posted by: manowar821

My tolerance and respect for neo-cons is about as strong as it is for white supremacists and fascists.

Know why...?

Because they don't deserve it.

Being intolerant of intolerance is an admirable trait, you don't need to put up with pigs and bigots to be a good person.

Also, if I get temp-banned for saying that, I'd understand. Not because I deserve it, no no. Mainly because I understand that blatant racism and bigotry is fine, as long as they don't say any curse words...

I'm not sure if "neo-cons" is exactly the word you're looking for to describe these people. Really they are more like "paleo-cons". Neo-con ideology is mostly a foreign policy based one around aggressive foreign policy to democratize the rest of the world. Hating gays/culture/etc. really doesn't factor in. That's more the realm of the old style religious conservatives that have been gay baiting for... oh I don't even know how long.

Not that I don't dislike neo-cons and paleo-cons with relative equality, but it's important to know who we're insulting at any one time... hahaha.
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: manowar821

My tolerance and respect for neo-cons is about as strong as it is for white supremacists and fascists.

Know why...?

Because they don't deserve it.

Being intolerant of intolerance is an admirable trait, you don't need to put up with pigs and bigots to be a good person.

Also, if I get temp-banned for saying that, I'd understand. Not because I deserve it, no no. Mainly because I understand that blatant racism and bigotry is fine, as long as they don't say any curse words...

I'm not sure if "neo-cons" is exactly the word you're looking for to describe these people. Really they are more like "paleo-cons". Neo-con ideology is mostly a foreign policy based one around aggressive foreign policy to democratize the rest of the world. Hating gays/culture/etc. really doesn't factor in. That's more the realm of the old style religious conservatives that have been gay baiting for... oh I don't even know how long.

Not that I don't dislike neo-cons and paleo-cons with relative equality, but it's important to know who we're insulting at any one time... hahaha.

Hm... I'll have to look that up. Thanks.
 
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.


According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

What a tolerant person you are!

Oh and careful of your last comment...I had a week vacation for posting the same thing :laugh:

My tolerance and respect for neo-cons is about as strong as it is for white supremacists and fascists.

Know why...?

Because they don't deserve it.

Being intolerant of intolerance is an admirable trait, you don't need to put up with pigs and bigots to be a good person.

Also, if I get temp-banned for saying that, I'd understand. Not because I deserve it, no no. Mainly because I understand that blatant racism and bigotry is fine, as long as they don't say any curse words...

Well, at least youre honest about your own bigotry and intolerance. Thats better than most neo-libs. 🙂 And youre right about your pig comment. Just remember there are pigs on both ends of the spectrum.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
Isn't teen sex lower than it has been previously? I recall reading that teens are waiting on sex and instead doing less risky sexual activities like oral and the like.
Oral sex = sex.
Vaginal intercourse = sex.
Anal intercourse = sex.


According to your way of thinking you could also add rape, incest, child abuse and bestiality.

Scary!

Oh an edit - speaking of bestiality - the new film "Zoo" now at Cannes has the same lingo the homo agenda people use:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21773713-5001026,00.html


Filmmaker Robinson Devor said the men that engaged in sex with horses had videos they made and "showed us the videos not to show us pornography, but to show an animal that wanted to be with them".

Variety said " "They've crafted a subdued, mysterious and intensely beautiful film that presents bestiality not for the purpose of titillation - but as a way of investigating the subjective nature of morality," .

Haha - so thinking it's wrong getting porked in the butt by a horse (one guy died from it in Washington) is just subjectively wrong.

"The men heard in the film are remarkably honest about their motivations. One of them argues "mammal to mammal" love should not be seen as wrong."

Humm - where we heard this before?

"Another firmly rejects the tag "bad person" his employer lays upon him before he is sacked. They all say the horses were willing participants."

The pedos say the same thing about kids. You know - the ones who march in the "Gay Pride" parades.

Society is getting just too weird!

Why is this creature still on the forums? I understand free speech, hell, I'll fight for his right to say what he likes. But he's a moron. He has nothing of value to say, and this has been proven with every post he's made. He's blatantly homophobic and bigoted. In real life, I go out of my way to start fights with jerk-offs like him, just so that I could have the possibility of defending myself should he throw the first punch.

I mean, god damnit, I am almost willing to believe he's just a different user who made a "troll account" so that he can speak his mind without compromising his other account's image, knowing full well that he's a douche-bag.

Honestly, I cannot wrap my head around the sheer stupidity of people like him. It's beyond me.

Anyways, neo-cons can suck my dick.

What a tolerant person you are!

Oh and careful of your last comment...I had a week vacation for posting the same thing :laugh:

My tolerance and respect for neo-cons is about as strong as it is for white supremacists and fascists.

Know why...?

Because they don't deserve it.

Being intolerant of intolerance is an admirable trait, you don't need to put up with pigs and bigots to be a good person.

Also, if I get temp-banned for saying that, I'd understand. Not because I deserve it, no no. Mainly because I understand that blatant racism and bigotry is fine, as long as they don't say any curse words...

Well, at least youre honest about your own bigotry and intolerance. Thats better than most neo-libs. 🙂 And youre right about your pig comment. Just remember there are pigs on both ends of the spectrum.

Did you miss the entire rest of my post? Hating bigotry is not bigotry itself, it's correct.

You make me laugh.
 
Back
Top