KMFJD
Lifer
- Aug 11, 2005
- 32,646
- 52,077
- 136
I can see coal as a more viable form of energy in remote villages. They don't have a grid, let alone the battery arrays, so you'd see a star configuration where you have the central power plant and the village laid out around it. It would produce power at night when they need it most for lighting, and is a more simple way to do things like heat water, opposed to solar array + grid + batteries + electric heater.
It has the cheaper cost of entry, where there is no money. It would be nice if their government decided to run power but until then what are they to do? Move elsewhere? I've always thought that was the better idea.
Granted politicians think in terms of their lavish lifestyle in the US, not about what each individual home could do to be self sufficient just to run some light bulbs or charge up a cell phone, but there's nothing about offering our coal exports that stops them from choosing that path instead.
You do know it takes quite a bit of coal to power a generating station right? How are you going to get that to remote villages on a regular basis unless there's a local source.