The Ryzen "ThreadRipper"... 16 cores of awesome

Page 44 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
Can't understand that language. What's it say? I think it said something about AMD profiting off the X299 S**T storm.
 

tamz_msc

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2017
3,865
3,730
136
Can't understand that language. What's it say? I think it said something about AMD profiting off the X299 S**T storm.
Well you could have just clicked on the images :D- AsRock and Gigabyte boards now have heatpipes on the VRMs, Gigabyte has increased the surface area compared to what was shown at Computex.

MSI's board has stacked fins, might have compatibility issues with CPU coolers.
 

formulav8

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
7,004
523
126
So the classic "I'm out of arguments so I just do a personal attack".

Actually the classic, no need to complain over spilled milk. The socket, the chip, and surface area is huge on TR compared to any previous AMD dt setup.
 

ddogg

Golden Member
May 4, 2005
1,864
361
136
I really like that MSI Carbon board. It might have gone to the top of my list. The VRM cooling looks insane, not to mention swappable heatsink covers.
 

Yakk

Golden Member
May 28, 2016
1,574
275
81
Hmm... I really want a 10 Gb integrated ethernet port as part of the motherboard, deal breaker for me with the life expectancy I have for this upcoming build. Would really like to see more choices with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: estarkey7

ajc9988

Senior member
Apr 1, 2015
278
171
116
Hmm... I really want a 10 Gb integrated ethernet port as part of the motherboard, deal breaker for me with the life expectancy I have for this upcoming build. Would really like to see more choices with it.
Let's put this in perspective, do you need 10Gb in the next 3 years. If not, then you are wrong. By that time, we'll have DDR5 and PCIe 4.0, meaning you'd likely upgrade your board anyways if you wanted 10Gbps, something not found on X299 either. So, what's the issue?

Also, on choices, these are top end boards with few lines to put more at the top. If you are saying you want lower options, then why bring up 10Gbps. Have you even compared them to the counterparts?
 

Yakk

Golden Member
May 28, 2016
1,574
275
81
Let's put this in perspective, do you need 10Gb in the next 3 years. If not, then you are wrong. By that time, we'll have DDR5 and PCIe 4.0, meaning you'd likely upgrade your board anyways if you wanted 10Gbps, something not found on X299 either. So, what's the issue?

Also, on choices, these are top end boards with few lines to put more at the top. If you are saying you want lower options, then why bring up 10Gbps. Have you even compared them to the counterparts?

I do, amongst its new duties it'll run alongside my Synology DS1817+ box and the type of server work it'll do will have a lot of I/O. Being able to game on top of it is just the enthusiast in me :D
 

ajc9988

Senior member
Apr 1, 2015
278
171
116
I do, amongst its new duties it'll run alongside my Synology DS1817+ box and the type of server work it'll do will have a lot of I/O. Being able to game on top of it is just the enthusiast in me :D
Fair enough. My network is still 1Gbps, so I'm just using a quad and doing port teaming for the moment.

But, some people will want it to future proof, so I wanted to make sure it was an actual need. Scannall pointed to a good board, so that may simplify your decision.
 

dnavas

Senior member
Feb 25, 2017
355
190
116
Let's put this in perspective, do you need 10Gb in the next 3 years.

Yes!
Does it have to be built-in? No, but I can see the advantage of the cleanliness of it, particularly if it comes with a regular ethernet port as well (connect straight to NAS, keep the GB port connected to the switch). What I don't (strictly) need is a 10GBE switch. I'll be comparing prices with the cost of buying something like the AQN-107-104-SFA separately.
 

ajc9988

Senior member
Apr 1, 2015
278
171
116
Yes!
Does it have to be built-in? No, but I can see the advantage of the cleanliness of it, particularly if it comes with a regular ethernet port as well (connect straight to NAS, keep the GB port connected to the switch). What I don't (strictly) need is a 10GBE switch. I'll be comparing prices with the cost of buying something like the AQN-107-104-SFA separately.
Unless using a switch with at least one 10GBE port (then using VLAN to split the port as needed), a crossover between devices with 10GBE enabled, etc., why do it if you cannot utilize it?
 

dnavas

Senior member
Feb 25, 2017
355
190
116
Unless using a switch with at least one 10GBE port (then using VLAN to split the port as needed), a crossover between devices with 10GBE enabled, etc., why do it if you cannot utilize it?

Not sure I understand your question. I don't need the switch as I can just connect the NAS to the editing machine. It might make things marginally simpler if the network was flat, but a switch is otherwise unnecessary -- assuming, of course, that each of the boxes in question also have 1gbe connections. I need the full bandwidth between two endpoints, I don't need it shared across multiple machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajc9988

ajc9988

Senior member
Apr 1, 2015
278
171
116
Not sure I understand your question. I don't need the switch as I can just connect the NAS to the editing machine. It might make things marginally simpler if the network was flat, but a switch is otherwise unnecessary -- assuming, of course, that each of the boxes in question also have 1gbe connections. I need the full bandwidth between two endpoints, I don't need it shared across multiple machines.
That is what I meant by crossover (using a crossover cable between two computers or devices in a direct connection). You know what you need, so it's all good! :)
 

Yakk

Golden Member
May 28, 2016
1,574
275
81
Fair enough. My network is still 1Gbps, so I'm just using a quad and doing port teaming for the moment.

But, some people will want it to future proof, so I wanted to make sure it was an actual need. Scannall pointed to a good board, so that may simplify your decision.

Yeah I'm investigating going to a parallel type DAS & NAS setup on the 1817+ with the Threadripper attached directly via 10 Gb to avoid congestion & the rest of the network attached via it's 4x 1Gb ports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IEC and ajc9988

ajc9988

Senior member
Apr 1, 2015
278
171
116
When is the threadripper NDA lifting? Is it tonight, 30th or on the 10th?
Likely siggraph. It may be on the 27th, as pre-orders for MBs and AW Area 51 machines supposedly start. So, very soon. But August 10th is sale. I'm just hoping for MB comparisons by then.
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
I'm curious what Dell's Area 51 Threadripper systems are going to look like. Knowing them, they'll probably come standard with a pathetic 8 GB of RAM, a low end video card like a 3 GB GeForce 1060, and a 1TB 5400RPM hard drive. If you're going to put crap like that in the box, you might as well just get a Ryzen 5 instead.

By the time you "upgrade" to a proper amount of memory, a good video card, and an SSD in it it will probably cost $5,000.
 

ddogg

Golden Member
May 4, 2005
1,864
361
136
I'm curious what Dell's Area 51 Threadripper systems are going to look like. Knowing them, they'll probably come standard with a pathetic 8 GB of RAM, a low end video card like a 3 GB GeForce 1060, and a 1TB 5400RPM hard drive. If you're going to put crap like that in the box, you might as well just get a Ryzen 5 instead.

By the time you "upgrade" to a proper amount of memory, a good video card, and an SSD in it it will probably cost $5,000.
Hmm, not really actually. You can get them with a 1080Ti and 32GB RAM if you want. You will have to pay a pretty penny for it though.
Some details are here https://videocardz.com/71211/amd-ryzen-threadripper-systems-are-now-available