cbn
Lifer
- Mar 27, 2009
- 12,968
- 221
- 106
You enable the conversation, and help the other party establish credibility. Your choice ofc.
My question is helping him establish credibility? How is that?
You enable the conversation, and help the other party establish credibility. Your choice ofc.
Anyone have any ideas as to whether or not the larger package will allow for better heat dissipation
Hopefully AMD bundles a good quality one.
Noctua already showed off three designs at Computex for TR/EPYC. The NH-U14S, the NH-U12S and the NH-U9. Given that the R7 1800X doesn't come with HSF and none of the Intel HEDT chips come with one either, it seems pretty obvious that aftermarket support is all there will be. This will definitely be a factor in pricing, since you can't just use a pre-existing HSF from another model like you can with Intel chips.Could be hard to find heat sinks for these beasts. I'm not sure a lot of the common manufacturers are going to think there's a big enough market to manufacture one.
The server chips are clocked at a much slower clockspeed than Threadripper. Threadripper will be running at a minimum of 3.4/3.8 (based on current engineering samples, but AMD's target has always been 3.6/4.0 to match up with the 1800x...I imagine we will end up with 3.5/3.9 when TR launches...but I could be wrong.) Servers are typically also passively cooled, with case fans being responsible for moving air through the CPU heatsink. Therefore, Threadripper's coolers will be completely unique.This is the same package as the server. So all the server heatsinks should be applicable. Good quality won't be the problem, affordability might be!
Could be hard to find heat sinks for these beasts. I'm not sure a lot of the common manufacturers are going to think there's a big enough market to manufacture one.
http://noctua.at/en/noctua-at-computex-2017Since the heatspreaders of the new SP3/TR4 CPUs are almost twice as big as the bases of Noctua’s normal CPU coolers, it is not possible to use them on these sockets and there will be no upgrade kits.
Some sites and magazines reported up to two digit points higher performance with dual rank mem (both apps and games). The software seems to benefit from some parallelism in the memory's inner workings. 2x the channels increase that even further.Do you guys think this will have better gaming performance because of the quad channel memory config?
I thought they would simply be slid (sp?) into the rails in the cover.https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6huphm/gigabyte_uk_showed_this_photo_of_an_x399_mobo_on/
![]()
You've gotta be careful when installing the CPU.. put it in at a slightly off angle and you'll probably screw something up...
Still, looks like a beast.
Dual-rank quad-channel memory is incredibly expensive though. 4x16GB kits are 450$+ on Newegg.Some sites and magazines reported up to two digit points higher performance with dual rank mem (both apps and games). The software seems to benefit from some parallelism in the memory's inner workings. 2x the channels increase that even further.
Points against that are the likely higher latencies for inter-die mem accesses and possibly some IF contention.
That's right and likely not worth the extra money for maybe 5% more fps. It'd be better to put that into a GPU then. But as I'm also doing deep learning and data processing, I got 2x16 for the R7. A TR buyer might also have other use cases in mind which benefit from more memory. Even a RAM disk might be interesting to some.Dual-rank quad-channel memory is incredibly expensive though. 4x16GB kits are 450$+ on Newegg.
Well, the 4x8 kit is just about twice the 2x8 kit I got for my Ryzen's, $360 total.Dual-rank quad-channel memory is incredibly expensive though. 4x16GB kits are 450$+ on Newegg.
Dual-rank quad-channel memory is incredibly expensive though. 4x16GB kits are 450$+ on Newegg.
Well, the 4x8 kit is just about twice the 2x8 kit I got for my Ryzen's, $360 total.
Well, since I understand that TR is basically 2 Ryzen cores in one chip, its like me adding 2 more systems, but I need only one PSU and case. AND for processing, 16 cores, and 32 threads is better than 8 cores.16 threads x 2. (for DC work)Ouch - My desire for TR is starting to soften. Hopefully by the end of the year , prices will come down somewhat.
Of course there's no movement when the lid is down. I was referring to when you put the CPU in place while the socket is open and the tiny contacts are exposed. Some people are clumsy and could be in for trouble.
I mean, somehow people get to destroy tiny (in comparison) LGA 115x sockets because they dropped the CPU or whatever, you can be sure someone is going to screw something up and get to post it somewhere![]()