I want it in matx factorIf anyone makes a Epyc-compatible E-ATX motherboard, I would totally buy one at that price. It's probably not that cheap though!
I want it in matx factorIf anyone makes a Epyc-compatible E-ATX motherboard, I would totally buy one at that price. It's probably not that cheap though!
Yep thats the problem with his tweets. 90% is bs 10% is 100% correct and stellar information. He clearly have inside source.Another portion of information from Fottemberg from BitsAndChips.
http://semiaccurate.com/forums/showpost.php?p=290705&postcount=594
If he is correct and the 12 core entry level Threadripper CPU will cost around 500(let it be even 599$) it is a bargain of the century.
P.S. Fott's information are sometimes hit and miss. But when he is correct, he is 100% correct.
If he is correct and the 12 core entry level Threadripper CPU will cost around 500(let it be even 599$) it is a bargain of the century.
Does it need to run in Quad-channel? I mean on x299 you can run in dual-channel and save money on RAM. i don't really need 32 gb.
You can always go with 4x4 GB setup for RAM.Does it need to run in Quad-channel? I mean on x299 you can run in dual-channel and save money on RAM. i don't really need 32 gb.
Yep thats the problem with his tweets (edit: BitsAndChips). 90% is bs 10% is 100% correct and stellar information. He clearly have inside source.
Volume and profit merge together for a company to make a profit. The fact is that compared to the last 8 years that even at an asp of $300 a die they are making way more profit per chip. Undercutting Intel to sell more chips and still getting great profit is better than selling it at a price near comparable to Intel and not selling any.Do you think AMD employees work for free, no R&D cost, it doesn't have any debt and no bills to pay? Why is it that AMD never makes any profit per year?
Yeah, at this point AMD should be primarily interested in getting the platforms and ecosystems out there (Epyc targeting Intel's mainstream 2s offers for data centers also shows a push for volume). I think AMD will only start showing interest in doing market segmentation for profit of their own when it makes sense, e.g. once 7nm Zen 2 dies are available but haven't reached the yield of the current dies yet.Volume and profit merge together for a company to make a profit. The fact is that compared to the last 8 years that even at an asp of $300 a die they are making way more profit per chip. Undercutting Intel to sell more chips and still getting great profit is better than selling it at a price near comparable to Intel and not selling any.
Given that Threadripper will be 2 independent dies and memory controller in each, I wonder what will happen when the system has only 1-2 RAM sticks and not 4.
But times and mem controllers changed. 4 modules SR (or DR for higher performance) with 1/ch should run at clocks as high as 2ch system, just at twice the bandwidth.You probably wouldn't need all four channels populated; heck, it might even perform better with two channels, which is the scenario we had with Quad FX a decade ago.
But times and mem controllers changed. 4 modules SR (or DR for higher performance) with 1/ch should run at clocks as high as 2ch system, just at twice the bandwidth.
Do you think AMD employees work for free, no R&D cost, it doesn't have any debt and no bills to pay? Why is it that AMD never makes any profit per year?
Being 4 DIMMs this sould be fine! But you'll miss out on the dual rank performance gains, which are like 200-500 MHz higher RAM speed for several games and apps.My 32GB kit of G.Skill DDR-3200 CL14 single rank should be perfect for Threadripper![]()
All those OC DIMMs are rated at JEDEC 2133 speeds or so, but come with an pretested headroom (the XMP setting). Why shouldn't ECC RAM have some headroom too, just not being marketed this way?It's a shame that the infinity fabric is tied to the memory speed.
spending $750 on this slower ecc memory kinda hurts more than it should.