What's the cost break-even analysis of designing a 500mm2 28nm HD8970 card to go against 10,000 units of the Titan? For NV it is a <$9 million marketing expense from a product line that already exists. Brilliant brand equity builder too! For AMD it means spending hundreds of millions on a card that less than 1% of PC gamers will buy.
And yet it's a dual role card, what kind of penetration did AMD make with workstations? Couldn't have been too deep.
Yet still Nvidia made great profits selling a 520mm2 40nm die for $370. I think you greatly over estimate the cost to fab these chips. R&D is costly, wafers were costly, the chips themselves in bulk amount to a fraction of the price you pay at best buy. Nvidia isn't throwing up record profits because chips are costly, even the difference between GF114 and GF110 was trivial compared to their retail prices.
Sounds nice but it sounds like the Titan is a limited edition run. Are these failed K20X parts or simply a marketing exercise? Will NV be willing to sell a 7billion GK110 at the lower price levels you described if consumers are buying GTX670/680s at $350-500?
Nvidia just hit over 60% market share, but their product is inferior. How long do you think Nvidia is going ride this train? Seems like the engine is running out of steam, and you can't make a faster 680. I'm positive Nvidia isn't interested in selling "Flagship" moniker cards for sub $350, which is where they need to be to stem "this tide"
sold more 7900 cards in January 2013 than in any month prior
I think Nvidia will move in with a refresh, why not? They can, they have money they don't need to sit around twiddling their thumbs playing a close race when they can simply walk away with it. AMD has made it quite clear their only method to counter now is price reduction and expensive game bundles. If I had to guess their new plan is to move bulk at reduced prices, because they've lost so much market share.
Who says 28nm HD8970 even exists? Every single story online about GK114 or HD8970 was always rumour mill.
Never said it did, or didn't, only that not having it and waiting reminds me of their FX days (before the bad FX days). Sitting around on a design in this industry get's you smoked, FX vs Conroe smoked. Instead of "being predators" and going after the market (which admittedly they tried, to wit they lost tons of market share) they've regressed into "sheep" mode at the first sign of adversity.