The Royal Wedding

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
a777pilot

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Will any of you be watching?









Me? I would rather spend that time out in the garage beating my thumb with a three pound hammer. So, NO!
 
CallMeJoe

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
Be honest, now; we can tell you're absolutely riveted waiting to see Kate's dress...


...and dying to see if you can find it in your size...
 
Brigandier

Brigandier

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2008
4,394
2
81
Waste of time, money and thought.

The only people that care about princesses are too busy playing tea time with their dolls.
 
ProfJohn

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
I will look at the pictures online and maybe a video or two.

But watch it live? Unless I happen to be home and up at the moment it happens and can find it on the net then no.
 
Jaskalas

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,535
10,807
136
Well I sure as hell don't care. People marry all the time. Just because the media wants something to matter doesn't mean it does.

I suppose if you believe in celebrity and royalty, believe in elevating others above yourself, then they would mean something.
 
R

RabidMongoose

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Absolutely not. Why would I want to watch something that represents British gender and religious discrimination? It's absolutely ridiculous that the British people actually worship this family as if they are Gods.

Let the inbred family's son and his fiance get married on their own and without the support of the state and the peasants.
 
Zorkorist

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
When they hit a pillar, in a tunnel, at 90 KMH, I'll watch, for grins and giggles.

-John
 
Drako

Drako

Lifer
Jun 9, 2007
10,697
161
106
Don't know either one, and don't care.

Why would anyone care about any kind of "royal" wedding in this day and age?
 
C

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
No. The wedding is a crime against humanity.

It's also interesting how the peasants are told to live in a new era of austerity, but the children of an inbred family can continue to live in government-paid opulence and have extravagant weddings. And of course the peasants don't even question the crackdown on their civil rights as the police crush any dissent to the wedding.
 
Lemon law

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Why should I get worked up either way, we have an a long standing ally in England, and since the wedding is a big deal in England why should I alternately jump up and down and say poo poo. And therefore dope slap England for being frivolous while alienating people for being a doubting Thomas.

After all the future is yet unknown, Kate and whatever royal prince, is it Edward or maybe Phillip, may end up being a force for future good or evil.

Its just the nature of being of royal birth, they achieve a certain innate fame by birth while others have to make it on merit. But once they do the dirty deed sin of matrimony, then like everyone else they have to make it on merit.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,277
55,861
136
You guys know that there's a credible argument to be made that the British royal family brings in more money through increased tourism than they spend on upkeep, right? Things like that are hard to measure of course, but it doesn't seem that implausible to me. People love those idiots for some inexplicable reason.
 
a777pilot

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Lemon law said:
Why should I get worked up either way, we have an a long standing ally in England, and since the wedding is a big deal in England why should I alternately jump up and down and say poo poo. And therefore dope slap England for being frivolous while alienating people for being a doubting Thomas.

After all the future is yet unknown, Kate and whatever royal prince, is it Edward or maybe Phillip, may end up being a force for future good or evil.

Its just the nature of being of royal birth, they achieve a certain innate fame by birth while others have to make it on merit. But once they do the dirty deed sin of matrimony, then like everyone else they have to make it on merit.
Click to expand...


Merit plays no part with the "royals", only who your father, mother or spouse is.
 
R

RabidMongoose

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
eskimospy said:
You guys know that there's a credible argument to be made that the British royal family brings in more money through increased tourism than they spend on upkeep, right? Things like that are hard to measure of course, but it doesn't seem that implausible to me. People love those idiots for some inexplicable reason.
Click to expand...

Imagine the increase in tourism if all of the royal residences and collections were opened up to the public. Tourism would probably increase.

Moreover, tourism is pretty popular at royal palaces (Versailles) that don't have the government propping up an inbred family.

Finally, it's just freaking pathetic if the British are willing to put themselves into a peasant caste system for tourism.
 
R

RabidMongoose

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
CanOWorms said:
No. The wedding is a crime against humanity.

It's also interesting how the peasants are told to live in a new era of austerity, but the children of an inbred family can continue to live in government-paid opulence and have extravagant weddings. And of course the peasants don't even question the crackdown on their civil rights as the police crush any dissent to the wedding.
Click to expand...

That's what happens when you worship an inbred human being as if she were a God, similar to early humans worshiping the Sun as a deity.

I wonder if the European Court of Human Rights has jurisdiction over an issue such as this...they probably won't do anything about it because Europe is a complete joke when it comes to human rights.
 
wuliheron

wuliheron

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,536
0
0
I'm not big on parades or churches and without any free food and booze what's the point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom