- Feb 27, 2003
- 19,894
- 7,004
- 136
The reason why Intel is better than AMD
- Thread starter biostud
- Start date
Haha its just funny to read what a load of crap, o well, maybe they should of ran a game and then said
"well as u see the amd is getting more frames, but our intel machine is producing more quality frames which results in a more quility gaming experiance, and this also allows u to see slideshow images of the game better"
"well as u see the amd is getting more frames, but our intel machine is producing more quality frames which results in a more quility gaming experiance, and this also allows u to see slideshow images of the game better"
A good read. Why are you guys so derogatory??? It is true, Tom's Hardware confirms it!!! Intel has been better than AMD for, oh, forever. Even their slogans reveal that obvious fact. "Intel Inside." Gee, It's like they can read my mind! I don't want some 64 crap, that probably refers to the latency that you AMD guys are always talking about. So there you have it, Intel kills AMD. What a great, dominating company!!! :laugh:
- Aug 22, 2001
- 32,011
- 32,461
- 146
Intc is better where it matters most, profits 
AMD still only leads in what I consider the more esoteric areas. Financial Profits>* in the final analysis.
AMD still only leads in what I consider the more esoteric areas. Financial Profits>* in the final analysis.While i really feel intel is going to come roaring back this year from behind, at this point intel claiming dominance in any real world performance for pc users is just a joke. The only real scenario where intel makes a threat at all is severe multitasking, as in 4+ tasks, at least 2 of which are very cpu intensive.
StrangerGuy
Diamond Member
- May 9, 2004
- 8,443
- 124
- 106
- Aug 22, 2001
- 32,011
- 32,461
- 146
Even if it takes a bit longer, it certainly seems inevitable to me too.
This propaganda campaign is indicative that AMD is no longer just the metaphorical insect buzzing around Intcs' ear, but now the thorn in the Lions' paw, that they just can't seem to get teeth on to dislodge. My point is that thay have typically been dismissive of AMD in the past, so this is, in my mind at least, evidence that they are forced to at the very minimum, take them much more seriously. Perhaps we are witnessing the start of a similar dynamic to the one ATI&nV have had since ATI became a truly serious threat in not just performance, but also market share?
Jesus how pathetic
I thought this is the sort of thing that you'd see only with ATI/nvidia. Guess I was wrong. From what most peoplle were saying, it seems like intel is about to become really good again but seeing these sort of slides surely doesn't really help them.
I thought this is the sort of thing that you'd see only with ATI/nvidia. Guess I was wrong. From what most peoplle were saying, it seems like intel is about to become really good again but seeing these sort of slides surely doesn't really help them.
- Aug 22, 2001
- 32,011
- 32,461
- 146
I disagree. If misinformation/disinformation propaganda campaigns didn't benefit e.g. nV or ATI, do you think they would continue to expend resources on them? Propaganda is a very effective tool of warfare when used properly, and business=warfare.Originally posted by: jazzboy
Jesus how pathetic
I thought this is the sort of thing that you'd see only with ATI/nvidia. Guess I was wrong. From what most peoplle were saying, it seems like intel is about to become really good again but seeing these sort of slides surely doesn't really help them.
Originally posted by: StrangerGuy
Nice funny stuff there.
It pretty sick too, but it proves how much Intel is feeling the pinch from AMD.
Hmm, follow the link at the bottom to Story 0 at the inq, then to this...
http://web.archive.org/web/20010606000036/www.theinquirer.net/04040109.htm
Ah, the days when AMD chips were significantly more expensive to produce than Intel's yet still sold for significantly less, all while being clocked higher and performing better, mhz per mhz, in just about every way. (depending on the time period, though Socket A Athlons thoroughly ruled P3s and P4s until Northwood came about)
Look at that list though, all high end chips, starting at $95, and topping out at $220. Now Athlon 64s start at like $130 and go up to over $1000, AMD finally broke through the pricing that constrained them all the way from their clone days to Athlon XP.
Not to mention Semprons are considerably more expensive than the Durons of those days, remember when a $40 chip could match a Pentium?
http://web.archive.org/web/20010606000036/www.theinquirer.net/04040109.htm
Ah, the days when AMD chips were significantly more expensive to produce than Intel's yet still sold for significantly less, all while being clocked higher and performing better, mhz per mhz, in just about every way. (depending on the time period, though Socket A Athlons thoroughly ruled P3s and P4s until Northwood came about)
Look at that list though, all high end chips, starting at $95, and topping out at $220. Now Athlon 64s start at like $130 and go up to over $1000, AMD finally broke through the pricing that constrained them all the way from their clone days to Athlon XP.
Not to mention Semprons are considerably more expensive than the Durons of those days, remember when a $40 chip could match a Pentium?
Exactly. Those slides aren't aimed at hardware geeks. They're for sales people to spout at the general public who know nothing about computers. Blindside em with a few long techy words and misleading graphs and you've got a sale.Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I disagree. If misinformation/disinformation propaganda campaigns didn't benefit e.g. nV or ATI, do you think they would continue to expend resources on them? Propaganda is a very effective tool of warfare when used properly, and business=warfare.Originally posted by: jazzboy
Jesus how pathetic
I thought this is the sort of thing that you'd see only with ATI/nvidia. Guess I was wrong. From what most peoplle were saying, it seems like intel is about to become really good again but seeing these sort of slides surely doesn't really help them.
PingSpike
Lifer
- Feb 25, 2004
- 21,758
- 602
- 126
You're right...it does sort of feel like the FX/9000 series era kind of thing. A big slipup...right when a previously ineffective competitor suddenly comes out with a real show of force.
One things for sure...this won't be the last bucket of thick bullsh|t we'll see!
well, were about to get a bunch of Conroe propaganda and benchmarks coming in the next week, so it will be interesting to see how much of it turns out to be informative, and how much turns out to be garbage like this...
Hi! I have unsuccessfully tryed to found the original Intel presentation... There's a link to enjoy and share?
jesus. how pathetic. just shows you how much Intel sucks and how low they go. also, everybody probably know this by now, but remember when Intel and Skype made a deal that certain features in Skype 2.0 would only work on computers with Intel CPU's? well, just as i predicted, AMD sued them. just shows you all how low Intel will go...
compgeek89
Golden Member
- Dec 11, 2004
- 1,860
- 0
- 76
FelixDeCat
Lifer
- Aug 4, 2000
- 30,970
- 2,675
- 126
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 374
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter