• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The real reasons Microsoft and Sony chose AMD for consoles [F]

Page 29 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
They are in production. AMD said they built inventory for the new consoles. So they have them already back from the fab.
 
Judging by the expected 20-25% increase in revenue for Q3 they must be in decent volume already. All the talk is about shortages though, for both consoles, and with China opening up it's going to get worse before it gets better.
 
Well Bobcat eventually hit 1.75GHz with the E2-2000 (with a modest graphics increase included, but much higher graphics turbo) that's up almost 10% on release clocks of 1.6GHz. I don't think it's a huge stretch to get Jaguar to 2.15-2.2GHz, granted it would be in a much shorter time-frame assuming these higher parts release soonish.

I wouldn't say 2.15-2.2GHz is a huge stretch either, maybe it'll be on the lower end of binning or maybe they'll get there with some tweaks to the design. I just don't think that these parts have been clocked very conservatively to save power, I definitely think they're pushing on the upper ends of what the design can handle. If you think about it, leaving a bunch of frequency headroom on the table means you could have probably tightened the design in some way. Enthusiasts may love it when a CPU has a ton of overclocking potential but if overclockibility isn't even a feature it's just an inefficiency in the design. Hence why Intel appears to have deliberately brought down the clock headroom on Haswell.
 
Back
Top