The purpose of this thread is to ask users if they know if time is continuous or if it advances in discrete steps.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

middlehead

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
4,573
2
81
Originally posted by: sdifox
depends on your instrument. If you 'ave Rolex, it's continous. If you 'ave Casio, it's discrete.
Really? I'd heard that Casio was rather flamboyant.
 

Bill Brasky

Diamond Member
May 18, 2006
4,324
1
0
Originally posted by: Asparagus
Originally posted by: Juked07
Originally posted by: Arcadio
I'm not talking about the instruments used to measure time. I don't know if the posts about wristwatches are meant to be jokes.

I am talking about time itself. In a physical sense. Is there a "smallest unit of time"?

Planck Planck Planck

I actually got into an argument with a guy at work once over the pronunciation of "Planck". I said it was pronounced "plonk" while he was saying that the 'A' sound is long and it sounds like "plank". He got so mad at me he stormed out of the office - it was quite funny :D

Hey! I pronounced it with a long 'A' as well!

*storms out*
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,266
17,902
126
Originally posted by: middlehead
Originally posted by: sdifox
depends on your instrument. If you 'ave Rolex, it's continous. If you 'ave Casio, it's discrete.
Really? I'd heard that Casio was rather flamboyant.

You are thinking about CasioTech. I am talking about the digital watch from Casio.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,580
982
126
Originally posted by: Arcadio
I'm not talking about the instruments used to measure time. I don't know if the posts about wristwatches are meant to be jokes.

I am talking about time itself. In a physical sense. Is there a "smallest unit of time"?

Yes, there is. But it's immeasurable.
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arcadio
I'm not talking about the instruments used to measure time. I don't know if the posts about wristwatches are meant to be jokes.

I am talking about time itself. In a physical sense. Is there a "smallest unit of time"?

Yes, there is. But it's immeasurable.

Thats what she said.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,580
982
126
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arcadio
I'm not talking about the instruments used to measure time. I don't know if the posts about wristwatches are meant to be jokes.

I am talking about time itself. In a physical sense. Is there a "smallest unit of time"?

Yes, there is. But it's immeasurable.

Thats what she said.

Guess I walked right into that...:laugh:
 

gar3555

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
3,510
0
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arcadio
I'm not talking about the instruments used to measure time. I don't know if the posts about wristwatches are meant to be jokes.

I am talking about time itself. In a physical sense. Is there a "smallest unit of time"?

Yes, there is. But it's immeasurable.

Thats what she said.

Guess I walked right into that...:laugh:

That's what she said.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,871
10,665
147
Originally posted by: Asparagus
Originally posted by: Juked07
Planck Planck Planck
I actually got into an argument with a guy at work once over the pronunciation of "Planck". I said it was pronounced "plonk" while he was saying that the 'A' sound is long and it sounds like "plank".

It's not pronounced "plonk", which rhymes with "bonk", but more like somewhere between "plohnk" and "plahnk."

No wonder he ran out of the room! :p ;)



 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,266
17,902
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
depends on your instrument. If you 'ave Rolex, it's continous. If you 'ave Casio, it's discrete.

Actually, a Rolex is still discrete. You would need the new Seiko Spring Drive for it to be continuous. A Rolex runs at eight beats per second, very smooth, but still discontinuous.

ZV

damn you, I was trying to mock, yet you made me the mocked.
 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
Both time and space are discontinuous but we have a continuous notion of space and time. This is proof that we are living in a computer simulation. Think about it. How do we simulate a continuous system on a computer? Well, the continuous system might be described by a continuous differential equation but we on the computer it is a discrete version of the equation.

Think about how we would simulate humans living in a continuous world. We would have to make space and time discrete to model the continuous space and time because computers are discrete. In the real continuous world, the people there don't have quantum physics and stuff. But on our fake computer simulated world, we had to come up with this weird quantum stuff to explain our "discrete" space and time.

What I've told you must remain a secret. We can't let others know about this because it will cause a panic. Even though this world is really fake, from our fake perspective it's as real as real can be and having a mass of people in panic will cause misery that is real even though it is fake. I hope this makes sense.
 

blackdogdeek

Lifer
Mar 14, 2003
14,453
10
81
Originally posted by: Asparagus

I actually got into an argument with a guy at work once over the pronunciation of "Planck". I said it was pronounced "plonk" while he was saying that the 'A' sound is long and it sounds like "plank". He got so mad at me he stormed out of the office - it was quite funny :D

since we're in a technical thread:

short 'A' sound = rat
long 'A' sound = rate