The origins of moveon.org

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Sadly I don't think FelixDeKat is that rare. Anger over 9/11 gave fuel to people with a fascist predisposition.

*shakes head and wonders what ckg would think*

"Facist predispostion" - tell that to the idiots who oppose the swift boat vets in their quest to tell the truth. You people want it both ways. Forget about it. Who can speak and who cant, etc.

:cookie:


-------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0


Once again, the results were disappointing. Of the 30 candidates MoveOn opposed, nearly all were reelected.

sounds like a solid track record of achievement...
Republican's should fund them...i believe i will send them a check.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon


Once again, the results were disappointing. Of the 30 candidates MoveOn opposed, nearly all were reelected.

sounds like a solid track record of achievement...
Republican's should fund them...i believe i will send them a check.

For once we agree.



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https://www.moveonpac.org/donate/swiftresponse.html"><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https://www.moveonpac.org/donate/swiftresponse.html">https://www.moveonpac.or.........tresponse.html</a></a>

They take credit cards.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Kibbo
You guys used to have a regulation of the media that required equal time to both sides. Would you be happier with that? Instead of just shutting down all non campaign originated material, wouldn't it be a neat compromise to allow some of it, but to limit the amount in order to ensure fairness? I know that you guys take your freedom of speech so seriously that you would rather have it all, or none at all, but couldn't this be a neat compromise?


I fail to uderstand how the right wing thought it was OK when SBVFTT were all over the media, but now that GWB see's he might get out funded in this area he suddenlu denounces then and wants to get rid of them. It must be just a case of who's bull is being gored.