• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The OP Got The Facts of This Topic Woefully Wrong

Status
Not open for further replies.
Artdeco

Artdeco

Platinum Member
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/?qproject[]=cg&q=&qfdestination=Secretary+of+State&qfoclass=CONFIDENTIAL&qtfrom=2009-01-10&qsort=tdesc#result


I was wondering where all the bad blood between Assange and Clinton was coming from.

These are diplomatic cables purloined from classified government servers, not Hilary Clinton's private server. This OP is so fundamentally counter-factual as to be beyond redemption in its present form. The OP is welcome to start another, more truthful and factually accurate thread on this matter.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited:
I wonder if they will also release the 22 MILLION emails deleted by the Bush administration at the end of their terms. Probably not, Faux News not pushing it nor has there been repeated futile Congressional "investigations" over that.
 
Greenman said:
It won't go anywhere, Hillary is untouchable. She's as far above US law as anyone can be.
Click to expand...

I believe the FBI investigation was partially predicated on minimal harm coming from her actions. I think if wikileaks proves that adversaries of the US were able to download her emails from her private servers that will entirely change the issue and force some type of action. That would be the line for me personally on this issue. I've been waiting to see what comes of Assange's allegations.
 
Subyman said:
I believe the FBI investigation was partially predicated on minimal harm coming from her actions. I think if wikileaks proves that adversaries of the US were able to download her emails from her private servers that will entirely change the issue and force some type of action. That would be the line for me personally on this issue. I've been waiting to see what comes of Assange's allegations.
Click to expand...

no it wont.

Theres no line she can cross that would stop liberals for voting for her.
 
Thump553 said:
I wonder if they will also release the 22 MILLION emails deleted by the Bush administration at the end of their terms. Probably not, Faux News not pushing it nor has there been repeated futile Congressional "investigations" over that.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a two wrongs make a right argument to me. Im sure these are released because, you know, Clinton is running for president while Bush isnt.
 
PokerGuy said:
That's definitely true for some idiots (many of those types post here), but even the most dumb leftists usually have some line where they say "enough is enough".
Click to expand...

When she gets to being 25% as bad as Trump, I'll consider voting 3rd party. Right now she's about 12%. At least it's not Ted Cruz or Ben Carson though, they were such horrible options that almost nothing could be as bad as them.

And from what I've read these Wikileaks emails were obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, so exactly how confidential can they be?
 
PokerGuy said:
That's definitely true for some idiots (many of those types post here), but even the most dumb leftists usually have some line where they say "enough is enough".
Click to expand...

What led you to the conclusion that this release would be particularly damaging to Hillary? I mean, other than wishful thinking?

Why would it be?
 
thraashman said:
When she gets to being 25% as bad as Trump, I'll consider voting 3rd party. Right now she's about 12%. At least it's not Ted Cruz or Ben Carson though, they were such horrible options that almost nothing could be as bad as them.

And from what I've read these Wikileaks emails were obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, so exactly how confidential can they be?
Click to expand...

They're part of the Chelsea Manning leak, iirc.
 
Genx87 said:
Sounds like a two wrongs make a right argument to me. Im sure these are released because, you know, Clinton is running for president while Bush isnt.
Click to expand...


It doesn't make it right, but it is amazing how when Hillary did it, suddenly it became a big deal.
 
Subyman said:
I believe FBI said her servers were never accessed by unauthorized users. If this leak turns out to be real then that turns the entire thing around.
Click to expand...

This is listed under 'cablegate', which is the information that Manning stole. Cablegate doesn't have anything to do with her email server.
 
Zorba said:
Wasn't most of what he leaked off classified servers? So then, it would have nothing to do with Hilary's private server.
Click to expand...

Correcto mundo. The ravers don't care. The smell of bullshit attracts them like no other & they're eager to add more of their own.
 
Greenman said:
It won't go anywhere, Hillary is untouchable. She's as far above US law as anyone can be.
Click to expand...

It won't go anywhere because those documents came from Chelsea Manning. It's funny how you're perfectly confident in declaring that Clinton is above the law because she won't be prosecuted for something she had nothing to do with.

Don't you guys even bother to figure out what you're getting enraged about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top