• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Onion has obtained hundreds of documents from an anonymous source within the White House

pauldun170

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Following disclaimers provided because "reasons"

Disclaimer 1.
Below link is to the Onion. It is known as a humor site. The documents are not real. when reading documents, do not allow sand to creep into nether regions. Yes, it is "fake news" but it is done as a form of satire.

Disclaimer 2.
The following is my official "commentary" on the link below.
"I found it funny. You may find it funny too. Mike Pence...lol."

http://www.theonion.com/trumpdocuments
 
pauldun170 said:
Following disclaimers provided because "reasons"

Disclaimer 1.
Below link is to the Onion. It is known as a humor site. The documents are not real. when reading documents, do not allow sand to creep into nether regions. Yes, it is "fake news" but it is done as a form of satire.

Disclaimer 2.
The following is my official "commentary" on the link below.
"I found it funny. You may find it funny too. Mike Pence...lol."

http://www.theonion.com/trumpdocuments
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, satire does not = "fake news"
 
pcgeek11 said:
To be honest it is about as accurate as any other main stream media news source these days.
Click to expand...

Off Topic apologies and don't answer if you don't want to, I know some forum dwellers will make a huge deal of it.
Do you have some or moderate buyers remorse with Trump?
 
Fanatical Meat said:
Off Topic apologies and don't answer if you don't want to, I know some forum dwellers will make a huge deal of it.
Do you have some or moderate buyers remorse with Trump?
Click to expand...

I don't like everything he does. Nobody is perfect. I think that he deserves some criticism.
I do not think he deserves the massive witch hunt that the media and the democrats are pushing.

I just could not bring myself to vote for Hillary Clinton. The biggest reason was the SCOTUS appointments.
 
pcgeek11 said:
I don't like everything he does. Nobody is perfect. I think that he deserves some criticism.
I do not think he deserves the massive witch hunt that the media and the democrats are pushing.

I just could not bring myself to vote for Hillary Clinton. The biggest reason was the SCOTUS appointments.
Click to expand...

Thank you for being brave enough to answer in a concise way,
Good night boss
 
Sheik Yerbouti said:
Specifically, why not garland?
Click to expand...
I'm sure after having Scalia, the most constitutionally ignorant human being to ever occupy a seat on the SCOTUS, having someone who actually followed the Constitution was a terrible threat to conservative viewpoints which in general despises the parts of the Constitution that isn't the Second Amendment.
 
thraashman said:
I'm sure after having Scalia, the most constitutionally ignorant human being to ever occupy a seat on the SCOTUS, having someone who actually followed the Constitution was a terrible threat to conservative viewpoints which in general despises the parts of the Constitution that isn't the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...

Good 'ol Leo, telling you what America should be! (in his rotund vision of humans)

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/the-conservative-pipeline-to-the-supreme-court
 
brycejones said:
What was your biggest concern about SCOTUS appointments? Serious question.
Click to expand...

In a nut shell:
Just as you and many others would "probably prefer" a left leaning SCOTUS. My preference would be a right leaning SCOTUS. The odds of getting anything near my preference with a Democrat or Bernie Sanders ( whatever he is ) would be slim and none in my opinion.
 
Sheik Yerbouti said:
Specifically, why not garland?
Click to expand...

I personally didn't have any specific issues with Garland. I do think he deserved a vote, but the house felt otherwise. I also think they were within their legal right to withhold the vote considering that it was in an election year.

Why not Gorsuch?
 
pcgeek11 said:
In a nut shell:
Just as you and many others would "probably prefer" a left leaning SCOTUS. My preference would be a right leaning SCOTUS. The odds of getting anything near my preference with a Democrat or Bernie Sanders ( whatever he is ) would be slim and none in my opinion.
Click to expand...
I would start with a POTUS who deals in reality first. Once that happens we can deal with the rest.
 
I hate to interrupt the infighting but did anyone actually read any of the docs?
Surprised no one said anything about the topless picture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top