• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Official ANTI-WOKE anti-lgbt conservaterrorist mob thread!

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
May as well call this the Kim Davis law. Not only allow people to refuse LGBTQ people marriage but ANYONE they don't like. I guess Loving v Virginia didn't mean anything.
First they came for the Jews and the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for the gays and the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for the minorities and the whites thought it won’t be us, they then came for all non-Christian’s and the wrong type of Christian and MOST of the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for poor and only 1% of the whites thought they won’t come for us. Then the rebellion came for the 1% and there was no one left except the broken whisper of a failed grand experiment … lost to alt-facts, avarice and fear of the other. Sad
 
First they came for the Jews and the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for the gays and the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for the minorities and the whites thought it won’t be us, they then came for all non-Christian’s and the wrong type of Christian and MOST of the whites thought it won’t be us, then they came for poor and only 1% of the whites thought they won’t come for us. Then the rebellion came for the 1% and there was no one left except the broken whisper of a failed grand experiment … lost to alt-facts, avarice and fear of the other. Sad
This is really just a continuation of the project of the last 20 years where religious people get to choose what laws they feel like following.
 
This is really just a continuation of the project of the last 20 years where religious people get to choose what laws they feel like following.
We're a country of laws (unless you just decide your religion says "Nope" and then the laws don't apply).

I can't wait for some asshole to say their religion precludes paying taxes and that cause gets taken up by the right.
 
May as well call this the Kim Davis law. Not only allow people to refuse LGBTQ people marriage but ANYONE they don't like. I guess Loving v Virginia didn't mean anything.
Well, Kim Davis wasn't officiating, she was just a clerk that refused to issue licenses.
It sounds like there's already not currently any mechanism to force someone in Tennessee to officiate a wedding they disagree with, and this is just codifying that in law. So you find someone else, or have someone close to you get ordained and have them officiate.
It does seem like the reprehensible shithole that is Mississippi does have a law that allows the clerk to not issue licenses though, and North Carolina as well.
 
We're a country of laws (unless you just decide your religion says "Nope" and then the laws don't apply).

I can't wait for some asshole to say their religion precludes paying taxes and that cause gets taken up by the right.
I am genuinely unsure why under prevailing reasoning that wouldn’t work other than Calvinball. After all they said the state couldn’t stop large groups of people from gathering indoors and loudly singing during a deadly respiratory pandemic. If outright killing your fellow citizens is fine why pay taxes?
 
Well, Kim Davis wasn't officiating, she was just a clerk that refused to issue licenses.
It sounds like there's already not currently any mechanism to force someone in Tennessee to officiate a wedding they disagree with, and this is just codifying that in law. So you find someone else, or have someone close to you get ordained and have them officiate.
It does seem like the reprehensible shithole that is Mississippi does have a law that allows the clerk to not issue licenses though, and North Carolina as well.

Personally if I was a decent human being that could marry people, I'd simply refuse to marry Republicans. I know they aren't a protected class, so it is different, but still, I think more people should simply start doing it.
 
We're a country of laws (unless you just decide your religion says "Nope" and then the laws don't apply).

I can't wait for some asshole to say their religion precludes paying taxes and that cause gets taken up by the right.
Isn't that what tax exempt status of religious institutions is?
 
We're a country of laws (unless you just decide your religion says "Nope" and then the laws don't apply).

I can't wait for some asshole to say their religion precludes paying taxes and that cause gets taken up by the right.
That's been around for decades.
 
This fucking guy 🙄
"That means if you’re a man on Friday night and all of the sudden on Saturday, you feel like a woman and you want to go in the women’s bathroom in the mall, you will be arrested — or whatever we got to do to you.”
This isn't really a thing...
“We’re not tearing society down because of this,”
Gosh, look at all the bathroom crimes that have happened in NC since they repealed HB 2. Society in shambles. Next thing you know there will be unisex bathrooms in every home in America!
 
Republicans will force all good people out of education.

 
Last edited:
Republicans will force all good people out of education.


WV also passed along a bill to allow teachers to carry guns in school.

I'm sure this will end well
 
Republicans will force all good people out of education.
JFC. This is straight up facism.

(The “nays” included all 11 Democrats in the House.)
I'm so glad that us dems iin WV have equal representation in this shithole state.
 
in Kansas

US lawmakers have forced an anti-trans ‘bathroom bounty’ law into effect, despite a state governor’s veto.

The law requires that individuals bring their Passports, birth certificates, or other relevant medical documents with them when accessing single-sex facilities. If they are deemed in violation of the bathroom ban sex-proving, they could be fined up to $1,000 (£743). Both the wording and enforcement mechanism of this bill is incoherent.

 
in Kansas

US lawmakers have forced an anti-trans ‘bathroom bounty’ law into effect, despite a state governor’s veto.

The law requires that individuals bring their Passports, birth certificates, or other relevant medical documents with them when accessing single-sex facilities. If they are deemed in violation of the bathroom ban sex-proving, they could be fined up to $1,000 (£743). Both the wording and enforcement mechanism of this bill is incoherent.


a passport and medical records to go potty at the mall, lmfao kansas!
 
a passport and medical records to go potty at the mall, lmfao kansas!

Morality throwbacks emboldened by a corporate corrupted Supreme Court that politicized religion and morals into a hypocritical circle jerk, all sired by a bunch of oligarchs having fun turning their racist MAGAts into liberal seeking missiles of mass oppression and discrimination.
 
Back
Top