The Obama-DOJ ordered FBI not to pursue charges against Hillary

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
The problem is they know Trump is insanely corrupt and incompetent. It's not like they can run on the fact that he's honest, good at his job, has lots of accomplishments, is well liked, etc. Their only outlet is 'buh buh buh HILLARY'.

They admire Trump for getting away with it. I confess to having a little bit of it myself. Imagine getting away with 10% of the shit Trump has pulled in his life. OTOH, I never was so foolish as to think he wasn't trying to con me along with the rest of the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex...own-on-clinton-email-prosecution-gop-rep-says

Title of story (which I'm told the subjects of the thread must reflect here) -
Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ordered-fbi-not-to-prosecute-hillary-clinton/ -
isa Page: Obama DOJ Ordered FBI Not to Prosecute Hillary Clinton

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...gross-negligence-in-2016-and-doj-told-them-no - Lisa Page said FBI discussed charging Hillary Clinton with 'gross negligence' in 2016, and DOJ told them no


The subject quite accurately reflects the news contained in the links.

The Obama-DOJ told the FBI not to pursue charges.

Three stalwarts of the news

Washington examiner - ha
FOX - haha
Breitbart - hahaha

ha+haha+hahaha=Bullshit
 
Last edited:

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Her quotes are right there. Not rocket science.

Read this one back to us, OK?-

We neither had sufficient evidence to charge gross negligence, nor had it ever been done, because the Department viewed it as constitutionally vague’ Page told a joint committee investigating the prosecutorial decisions

Or just show us on the doll where the crooked Hillary touched you..
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,732
6,755
126
Yea, yea, my amygdala, I'm stroking it now. :rolleyes:

Classic liberalism is a great thing, today's twisted version of totalitarian authoritarian liberalism that goes against most of its original foundation is a disease. Remember when liberals fought for the right to offend?
I remember feeling badly that I had no meat scraps today to feed Bruno the crow that was watching me looking at the sour grass. I wish I could tell him when he should show up. I did manage to make an appointment to check my eyes midday rather than early to avoid the stress of traffic. I think maybe traffic affects my amygdala like our wonderful liberal world that is getting better and better does you.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
Doesn’t matter, if they holler fax news long and loud enough it’ll go away.

Does it bother you that the quotes say the exact opposite of what he’s saying?

This is a good example of why you shouldn’t consume conservative media. They think you are stupid and will lie to you.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
Doesn’t matter, if they holler fax news long and loud enough it’ll go away.

That's rich coming from your delusions (like how you claim that unless you were physically there when something happened you could never know what actually happened), yet somehow you can be certain about things that you not only weren't present for but openly admit you know jack fucking shit about (I recall instances like the Starbucks situation where you admitted you didn't even know basic facts but you'd already made up your mind about what happened). Not only that but you straight up dismiss when the people that did something admit they did it (like the guy who said he was wrong for furthering the Seth Rich conspiracy, or the KKK admitting that they'll canvass neighborhoods with candy and pamphlets).

FYI, we can laugh because how they portray that shit does not lineup with what their own fucking articles actually say. I know reading is really difficult for you idiots, but if you'd actually learn to read, you'd learn a lot more and you wouldn't come off as intentionally stupid constantly.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
1) Bullshit
2) Bullshit

If Trump acted now it would look like retaliation and not built on substance. He knows how to play his cards, anyone that's ever negotiated and worked from a position of strength would understand this. I see how you have no idea. The Hillary storm might be yet to come.
It's hard for me to accept that there are people in this world as gullible as you are, but you leave me no choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
Does it bother you that the quotes say the exact opposite of what he’s saying?

This is a good example of why you shouldn’t consume conservative media. They think you are stupid and will lie to you.
Correction, they KNOW the people who consume conservative media are stupid.

It's hard for me to accept that there are people in this world as gullible as you are, but you leave me no choice.
Gullible isn't the right word. He's intentionally ignorant. He knows he's ignorant, he knows it's possible to be otherwise, but he also knows being knowledgeable would likely lead to him changing positions. So he CHOOSES ignorance because he's ... kinda a shit human being honestly.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Does it bother you that the quotes say the exact opposite of what he’s saying?

This is a good example of why you shouldn’t consume conservative media. They think you are stupid and will lie to you.

Truth isn't truth. It doesn't matter to UC, anyway, because he's just here to spread the FUD. He doesn't even need to read the quote two posts above his own to do that.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,564
10,242
136
Found the likely source of Slow’s projection:

2b58eeff7f3a0709bc67be1797113e00.jpg


This follows reporting that SDNY may now be pursuing obstruction charges against Trump.
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,318
9,689
136
You guys want to know what's *really* crazy? The stories the title stories share space with.

For example, scroll down on the daily mail page. Apparently there is a lot of crossover between the buttery males crowd and giving a shit about celebrity spats, what some Kardashian wore out to a club, and who some d list celebrity is dating now or something.

Weird innit?
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,710
136
You guys want to know what's *really* crazy? The stories the title stories share space with.

For example, scroll down on the daily mail page. Apparently there is a lot of crossover between the buttery males crowd and giving a shit about celebrity spats, what some Kardashian wore out to a club, and who some d list celebrity is dating now or something.

Weird innit?
not really, it's the daily mail, a tabloid, similar to the nation inquirer.
like most of what slow links to, it's bullshit. not too bright to believe anything printed in either but then slow isn't known for his intelligence.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,823
10,212
136
Protect your bubble at all costs.

I dunno man..If everyone here is in a impenetrable, unreachable "bubble"..what the hell are you doing here? do you honestly believe you are changing peoples minds, or educating them on your "correct" political path with thread after thread of rants, screeds, gotcha's, projection and diatribes? what is the debate here? this seems to be a complete waist of your time.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
I dunno man..If everyone here is in a impenetrable, unreachable "bubble"..what the hell are you doing here? do you honestly believe you are changing peoples minds, or educating them on your "correct" political path with thread after thread of rants, screeds, gotcha's, projection and diatribes? what is the debate here? this seems to be a complete waist of your time.

I mean the guy telling us all we are in a bubble has convinced himself that the reason Clinton hasn’t been prosecuted is that Trump is playing 9-D chess with a secret plan to prosecute her in the future instead of just admitting there was no reason to prosecute her to begin with.

He’s going to lose his shit when Don Jr. gets indicted.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,866
10,221
136
SlowSpyder said:

I post truth as I see it.
- - - -
That is scant evidence that you know what the fuck you're talking about:

Everything possible to be believed is an image of the truth. - William Blake

However, your image may be very far removed from veracity:

ve·rac·i·ty
/vəˈrasədē/
noun
noun: veracity
  1. conformity to facts; accuracy.
    "officials expressed doubts concerning the veracity of the story"
    synonyms:truthfulness, truth, accuracy, accurateness, correctness, exactness, precision, preciseness, realism, authenticity, faithfulness, fidelity; More
    reputability, honesty, sincerity, trustworthiness, reliability, dependability, scrupulousness, ethics, morality, righteousness, virtuousness, decency, goodness, probity
    "they expressed doubts about the veracity of the story"

    antonyms:falsity
    • habitual truthfulness.
      "voters should be concerned about his veracity and character"
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Are you saying that the claim is false?

Yeah, I think that's a safe bet, because the headlines in the OP are false as fuck. When the person testifying as to why someone wasn't charged for some crime says "It's because there wasn't enough evidence of said crime" and several members here seem to be unable to grasp what that means, just as you seem unable to grasp what that means. Willfully ignorant again, I guess, right?