• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The New GM

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
LOUISSSS like any other zealot tries to pass his biased opinion off as fact. Just like some of the other troll posters in the other forums, he will eventually be banned and we will look back and laugh.
 
Originally posted by: MBrown
Originally posted by: SickBeast
IMO the Malibu and Impala are a large part of why GM went down.

I really like the Camaro, the Volt looks interesting, and the Corvette has always been an incredible car.

Their trucks are decent, and I like Cadillacs. Buicks are good reliable cars, but they need a makeover IMO. The Rendez Vous is a nice truck, but their cars are ugly IMO.

Are you talking about the current Malibu or the older one?

Both.

If you look at the current MSRP of the Malibu ($23K to $31K), there are much nicer cars that can be found for that much, including the Prius.

IMO the Malibu is and always has been an ugly car. The new Impala is boring and ordinary looking. The previous model was similar in that regard.

I'm sure that the vast majority of people would take an Accord, Altima, or Camry over a Malibu at the same price. The Cobalt could also use a re-design. It seems to be a good car mechanically, but IMO it is also an ugly car. Look at the new Civic and the Mazda 3, then at the Cobalt. There is no comparison IMO.
 
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury

Do we keep having to bring up the fact that Buick is a major brand in China?
 
As someone who has driven several GM vehicles over the years, I can sympathize with LOUIS's opinion.

We had the following GM cars:

- an Astro van (died very prematurely; it only lasted 5 years or so)
- an 86 Cavalier (very crappy car; the tranny died fast and it rusted out as well)
- a Pontiac 6000 (1990 I think - this car was terrible and lasted about 5 years as well; it also had tranny problems)

My grandparents also owned a relatively high end Oldsmobile and it gave them tons of problems as well. The only good GM car we ever had was a 1994 Saturn SC2, but it needed to have its engine rebuilt; we were lucky it was still under warranty and had to fight the dealership tooth and nail to get them to fix it.

Sure, GM makes a few good cars. The problem is that their crappy cars far outnumber their good ones, and they built terrible cars from a reliability standpoint for way too long for most people to forget about. I don't think Honda and Toyota have ever built unreliable cars.
 
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury

Do we keep having to bring up the fact that Buick is a major brand in China?

That doesn't preclude GM from merging Buick with Cadillac and selling the good Buick cars under a merged brand name.
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
The new Impala is boring and ordinary looking. The previous model was similar in that regard.
The Impala is boring and ordinary, but it's also way overdue for a refresh. How long has it been since the last redesign--4 yrs? Surprisingly, the Impala was the best-selling large car in May:
Ford F-Series 33,381
Chevrolet Silverado 31,463
Toyota Camry 31,325
Toyota Corolla 23,576
Honda Accord 22,597
Honda Civic 20,723
Ford Fusion 19,786
Chevrolet Impala 18,709
Nissan Altima 18,408
Ford Escape 16,391

(Notice how the Camry and Accord are outselling the Corolla and Civic respectively.)
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury

Do we keep having to bring up the fact that Buick is a major brand in China?

That doesn't preclude GM from merging Buick with Cadillac and selling the good Buick cars under a merged brand name.

Yes it does. It's the Buick brand name that's a selling point in China. Buicks are considered a status symbol because historically communist party leaders were chauffeured in Buicks. The last Chinese emperor owned a Buick. People are buying it for the brand as much as they are the vehicle itself. If you kill the brand name you lose that advantage.
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
As someone who has driven several GM vehicles over the years, I can sympathize with LOUIS's opinion.

We had the following GM cars:

- an Astro van (died very prematurely; it only lasted 5 years or so)
- an 86 Cavalier (very crappy car; the tranny died fast and it rusted out as well)
- a Pontiac 6000 (1990 I think - this car was terrible and lasted about 5 years as well; it also had tranny problems)

My grandparents also owned a relatively high end Oldsmobile and it gave them tons of problems as well. The only good GM car we ever had was a 1994 Saturn SC2, but it needed to have its engine rebuilt; we were lucky it was still under warranty and had to fight the dealership tooth and nail to get them to fix it.

Sure, GM makes a few good cars. The problem is that their crappy cars far outnumber their good ones, and they built terrible cars from a reliability standpoint for way too long for most people to forget about. I don't think Honda and Toyota have ever built unreliable cars.

Oil turning to sludge, welds coming apart and frames rusting out completely? Being number one in recalls last year? Honda does very well, but Toyota's reputation outweighs its actual track record.

Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury

Do we keep having to bring up the fact that Buick is a major brand in China?

That doesn't preclude GM from merging Buick with Cadillac and selling the good Buick cars under a merged brand name.

Buicks are more entry level luxury though, if you can even consider them that. It's hard to place them, as there aren't really any other brands in that spot. Maybe Acura, at least from perception of where it sits (I don't think most people really put Acura into a full-fledged luxury marque).
 
If you look at the other manufacturers, they don't have two luxury brands. The market for luxury cars is much smaller than the market for ordinary cars. It makes no sense to have two luxury brands when you have only two other brands.
 
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Originally posted by: SickBeast
The new Impala is boring and ordinary looking. The previous model was similar in that regard.
The Impala is boring and ordinary, but it's also way overdue for a refresh. How long has it been since the last redesign--4 yrs? Surprisingly, the Impala was the best-selling large car in May:
Ford F-Series 33,381
Chevrolet Silverado 31,463
Toyota Camry 31,325
Toyota Corolla 23,576
Honda Accord 22,597
Honda Civic 20,723
Ford Fusion 19,786
Chevrolet Impala 18,709
Nissan Altima 18,408
Ford Escape 16,391

(Notice how the Camry and Accord are outselling the Corolla and Civic respectively.)

They say that Americans do not like small cars; that probably explains what you're saying about the Corolla and Civic.

I'm surprised to see the Impala outselling the Altima, but you did just prove my point. Without even looking at other models, there are at least 4 midsized cars being sold for every Impala sold.
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
If you look at the other manufacturers, they don't have two luxury brands. The market for luxury cars is much smaller than the market for ordinary cars. It makes no sense to have two luxury brands when you have only two other brands.

It's easy to say what they should do without seeing their books. They kept both because of the strength of sales and predicted sales in the future. If the math didn't work out it would have been Buick on the chopping block rather than some of the other brands.
 
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I know absolutely no one who would cross shop a Buick against a Lexus.

I agree. Buick and Cadillac should be merged. Saturn would have been a better brand to keep than Buick is. The same goes for Pontiac.

I think GM should have gone with 3 brands:

- performance
- economy/regular cars/trucks
- luxury

Do we keep having to bring up the fact that Buick is a major brand in China?

That doesn't preclude GM from merging Buick with Cadillac and selling the good Buick cars under a merged brand name.

Yes it does. It's the Buick brand name that's a selling point in China. Buicks are considered a status symbol because historically communist party leaders were chauffeured in Buicks. The last Chinese emperor owned a Buick. People are buying it for the brand as much as they are the vehicle itself. If you kill the brand name you lose that advantage.

i wonder how difficult it would be to make buick china-only
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
I'm surprised to see the Impala outselling the Altima, but you did just prove my point. Without even looking at other models, there are at least 4 midsized cars being sold for every Impala sold.

The Impala is full sized and you're comparing it against the sales of midsized? That doesn't really make sense. It seems like the midsized may be selling more just because people want midsized cars rather than anything to do with the Impala.

The Impala sells more than its full sized competitors, comparing it to cars it doesn't compete against isn't a good comparison.
 
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i wonder how difficult it would be to make buick china-only

I was wondering that too. It may be that if China is selling enough to cover the cost of the design work they don't have to be making as much money per car in the US to make it worthwhile for them to keep it opened here.
 
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Originally posted by: SickBeast
The new Impala is boring and ordinary looking. The previous model was similar in that regard.
The Impala is boring and ordinary, but it's also way overdue for a refresh. How long has it been since the last redesign--4 yrs? Surprisingly, the Impala was the best-selling large car in May:
Ford F-Series 33,381
Chevrolet Silverado 31,463
Toyota Camry 31,325
Toyota Corolla 23,576
Honda Accord 22,597
Honda Civic 20,723
Ford Fusion 19,786
Chevrolet Impala 18,709
Nissan Altima 18,408
Ford Escape 16,391

(Notice how the Camry and Accord are outselling the Corolla and Civic respectively.)
trucks are still selling more the cars?

 
Originally posted by: MBrown
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Originally posted by: SickBeast
The new Impala is boring and ordinary looking. The previous model was similar in that regard.
The Impala is boring and ordinary, but it's also way overdue for a refresh. How long has it been since the last redesign--4 yrs? Surprisingly, the Impala was the best-selling large car in May:
Ford F-Series 33,381
Chevrolet Silverado 31,463
Toyota Camry 31,325
Toyota Corolla 23,576
Honda Accord 22,597
Honda Civic 20,723
Ford Fusion 19,786
Chevrolet Impala 18,709
Nissan Altima 18,408
Ford Escape 16,391

(Notice how the Camry and Accord are outselling the Corolla and Civic respectively.)
trucks are still selling more the cars?

I'm thinking (and could be wrong) that many of those trucks are work/fleet/service type trucks.
 
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i wonder how difficult it would be to make buick china-only

I was wondering that too. It may be that if China is selling enough to cover the cost of the design work they don't have to be making as much money per car in the US to make it worthwhile for them to keep it opened here.

China dosen't actually have to cover anything to do with design, they are pirates, they just steal the design

Seriously GM put a Buick plant into china, officially and all, and China proceeded to just duplicate the plant multiple times. They excel at stealing other people's work.
 
Originally posted by: lurk3r
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i wonder how difficult it would be to make buick china-only

I was wondering that too. It may be that if China is selling enough to cover the cost of the design work they don't have to be making as much money per car in the US to make it worthwhile for them to keep it opened here.

China dosen't actually have to cover anything to do with design, they are pirates, they just steal the design

Seriously GM put a Buick plant into china, officially and all, and China proceeded to just duplicate the plant multiple times. They excel at stealing other people's work.

I meant if GM was selling enough to cover their design costs. If they couldn't turn a profit even with the piracy there they wouldn't be making as much money as they are there.
 
Originally posted by: lurk3r
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i wonder how difficult it would be to make buick china-only

I was wondering that too. It may be that if China is selling enough to cover the cost of the design work they don't have to be making as much money per car in the US to make it worthwhile for them to keep it opened here.

China dosen't actually have to cover anything to do with design, they are pirates, they just steal the design

Seriously GM put a Buick plant into china, officially and all, and China proceeded to just duplicate the plant multiple times. They excel at stealing other people's work.

even if it were produced in the US and imported for sale ONLY to china. buick as a US brand is synonymous with "old person" for the most part.
 
Originally posted by: lurk3r

Seriously GM put a Buick plant into china, officially and all, and China proceeded to just duplicate the plant multiple times. They excel at stealing other people's work.

so do you, never copied a cd or dvd before? except that its legal there, so why not? its cheaper and you wont be able to tell the difference.
 
Back
Top