Originally posted by: Evdawg
what i mean is, the Via chipset did better in a lot of tests ive seen... better than the nforce3 that is.
is this not correct?
The nForce3 150 series was badly hurt by its lack of native SATA support (in this enthusiast/built-it-myself niche we're in). It didn't have the attraction of nVidia SoundStorm audio like nF2 did. Its Hypertransport bus ran slower than VIA's (although VIA's V-link from northbridge to southbridge is slower yet, a fact that people failed to notice).
nForce3 250 series brings very high network performance, native SATA and any-drive RAID along, and has full-speed Hypertransport, although still no fancy audio processors. The network performance is interesting for certain situations. But the real kicker is operational PCI/AGP frequency lock, allowing overclockers to play with the CPU's speed without affecting the speed of the PCI and AGP buses. And so I'd say the nF3 250 will help nVidia pick up steam against VIA.
As for the heir apparent to the A7N8X, it's a little early to tell, partly because there are two types of sockets (754 and 939). Asus K8N-E Deluxe is a possibility if it OC's well and turns out to be a solid board, or the MSI 250Gb board maybe.