• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The new A64 Rev-E info and release dates?????

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I thought they meant that there's a performance boost simply for using 4 memory modules, not just because the memory will no longer have to run at 333MHz. No?

I'm looking forward to the Venice reviews and benchmarks this week 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Gerbil333
I thought they meant that there's a performance boost simply for using 4 memory modules, not just because the memory will no longer have to run at 333MHz. No?

I'm looking forward to the Venice reviews and benchmarks this week 🙂

Well I don't know, that might be true as well, but I haven't seen any DDR333 vs. DDR400 benchmarks for A64, so I can't say for sure.

I'm definitely looking forward to those reviews/benchmarks as well. Planning to do a relatively major upgrade within a few months (CPU, motherboard, and possibly/likely video card).

I'm still "limping along" on an Athlon XP system (although at 2400MHz, it's bearable 😛)
 
Originally posted by: jenneth
No, they're not. None of them has SSE3.

It also doesn't say it doesn't have SSE3... it just says it has SSE2, which is true of the Venice. It also lists the TDP as 89 watts, which is what a Venice is rated at, not a Winchester.

So I'd say it's possible, but you're probably not guaranteed to get a Venice, you might get a Winchester.
 
Originally posted by: Gerbil333
Originally posted by: Googer
Enhanced Integrated Memory Controller

[. . .]

All these improvements should help Venice based Athlon 64 processor to outperform their counterparts based on the older core revisions but working at the same clock frequency. And the performance gain will be more noticeable if there are four memory modules installed in the system."


http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-venice_3.html

So, even though 4 double sided DIMMS would require the system to run at 2T, there would be less of a performance hit than usual? I hope so. I really want 2GBs of RAM in my next machine.

2 GB? My next machine will have 4 or 6 GB of ram.
 
Originally posted by: jenneth
According to the X-bit labs article, 3500+ Venice has a TDP of 67 watts, same as the Windchester. Here-

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-venice_3.html

Though the A64 in question does have some pretty weird spec HERE:

It's a 3500 (90nm SOI), but is has a Thermal Power of 89 watts.

Right... but the Venice core, specific models excluded, have a TDP of 89 watts... so Monarch may be using the maximum for the Venice core.
 
*pops the champagne*

Finally! The processor I was waiting for so I could build my first system...

Well...emphaisis on "was"...

*looks at sig*

I'm weak...
 
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: jenneth
According to the X-bit labs article, 3500+ Venice has a TDP of 67 watts, same as the Windchester. Here-

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-venice_3.html

Though the A64 in question does have some pretty weird spec HERE:

It's a 3500 (90nm SOI), but is has a Thermal Power of 89 watts.

Right... but the Venice core, specific models excluded, have a TDP of 89 watts... so Monarch may be using the maximum for the Venice core.


Monarch just has the specs wrong. Thats definately a Winchester ADA3500BIBOX, if it were a Venice it would be ADA3500BPBOX
 
Back
Top