The New 3DMark Benchmark - Testing Smartphones to Multi-GPU Gaming PCs

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
There...Wanted 13K, got 13K

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/126367

Capture3.JPG
 

hyrule4927

Senior member
Feb 9, 2012
359
1
76
EDIT 3: At clocks of 1035/1250 i get a graphics score of 6940
Hmm, seems like my score is a little bit on the low side then? I am still running Catalyst 12.10 (every more recent version slows down Folding@Home), so that might be a factor. I'll bench again later to see if my scores are consistent.
 

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com
So I just completed a round of 15 different runs on my HD7870 to determine overclock scaling for core and memory separately. I'll post a chart soon. Long story short, I discovered a serious anomaly in memory scaling between 1250 and 1350 where it actually went negative, only to pick up again at 1400. I'd encourage folks using 3dMark to fine tune their overclock to test core and memory separately. The problem had previously been masked by bumping both core and memory up equally with each test.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
So I just completed a round of 15 different runs on my HD7870 to determine overclock scaling for core and memory separately. I'll post a chart soon. Long story short, I discovered a serious anomaly in memory scaling between 1250 and 1350 where it actually went negative, only to pick up again at 1400. I'd encourage folks using 3dMark to fine tune their overclock to test core and memory separately. The problem had previously been masked by bumping both core and memory up equally with each test.

You should run the same 1250-1350 mem speed benches on say 3D Mark, and see if it does the same thing.
 

Rikard

Senior member
Apr 25, 2012
428
0
0
I'm wondering if something might be inflating the scores - perhaps Virtu MVP? User Rhoxed scores 7399 with nearly the same clocks, and user Hyrule was slightly below that with 1035/1250 clocks.

Not saying you meant to do this - I'm just trying to figure out if 3dMark might be inconsistent or affected by other software. Your scaling is exactly what I expect though - about 3% for every 5% core, and 1% for every 3% memory. Hence the reason Rhoxed is about 15% faster than hyrule.
Everything in my setup is quite vanilla, though I am OCing the CPU by ASUS tools, so it does not pick up the actual frequency during system scanning:
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/102667
I really have no clue as to why the scores are what they are.
 

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com
Here's that data I promised you all - I've gone through a great number of tests on my HD7870 to test the overclock but also scaling. I find the results pretty surprising:

hd7870scalingcharts.jpg


Two big questions come to mind:
(1) Is error correction causing the memory scaling to turn negative in both 3dMark Fire Strike and 3dMark11?
(2) If so, why does positive scaling appear again as the memory clock gets higher? Is error correction taking place but cloaked by the increase in memory clock?

And two big conclusions:
(1) Memory overclocks do very little on the HD7870, and frankly, most professional review sites simply provide the highest "stable" overclock in their testing without determining whether it actually provides positive scaling.
(2) Taking my maximum tested core clock (1150, or 15% over reference) and maximum memory clock (1450, or 21% over reference), I get a total increase of 13.7% in performance.
 
Last edited:

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,329
126
How are people getting SLI to work in Firestrike ? SLI doesn't work for me and I've tried numerous drivers.
 

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com
How are people getting SLI to work in Firestrike ? SLI doesn't work for me and I've tried numerous drivers.

Crossfire worked very poorly for me when I tried it yesterday with dual HD7870s. The Graphics score scaled at 38%, the Combined score scaled negatively. Look carefully at the scores above for the HD7970s - everyone's combined score is the same, regardless of whether it's one or two cards.

And no, the Combined Score isn't that CPU-bottlenecked. It scaled up nicely with a single card's overclock.
 
Last edited:

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,329
126
Crossfire worked very poorly for me when I tried it yesterday with dual HD7870s. The Graphics score scaled at 38%, the Combined score scaled negatively. Look carefully at the scores above for the HD7970s - everyone's combined score is the same, regardless of whether it's one or two cards.

And no, the Combined Score isn't that CPU-bottlenecked. It scaled up nicely with a single card's overclock.

SLI literally does not work at all though. One card or two is the same score.
 

james1701

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2007
1,791
34
91
There is a blurb in one of the TimetoLiveCustoms video where Tom Logan says 3dMark knows there is an SLI issue and is working on it.

I do get both gpu's going, but only parts of it I get 99% usage though.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Not quite 20,000 but I might get there with a little more effort.
19267-3dm.JPG


The 680's came a long way in the seven months since my first post in this thread.
13782.JPG