ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,763
- 18,039
- 146
1. Eris pads her chestit's obvious that this thread is dead. No one cares about proving God exists.
So, now lets post classic rock song videos:
In my lifetime
it's obvious that this thread is dead. No one cares about proving God exists.
So, now lets post classic rock song videos:
and so here you are, posting....
That is typical of today's phoney intellectuals.....
Sad, very sad.
Or how about a real music video?
wistful fake news obituary that my thread is dead
Dear readers and my opponents, please cease and desist already from your wistful fake news obituary that my thread is dead, you could die earlier than my thread going off online, because it has the recipiency from AnandTech to stay and flourish in its forum space.
.
Now, dear readers and honest intelligent productive posters here, this morning I want to share with you that all words wasted by my opponents and atheists against God, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning...
All them words from my opponents and atheists indicate most glaringly that they my opponents here and all atheists, that they are not accustomed to see the big picture of things in reality i.e. in existence.
What they have are bits and pieces of reality by which they cannot have the whole entirety of the big true picture of existence, namely, there is the Higher Power that is in charge of everything that has a beginning, aka God, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
And owing to their blind faith in nonsense thinking, they postulate an insane idea of randomness as the cause of the universe and life and the nose on their face.
It is a fact that randomness does not bring about anything that can survive at all as to continue to stay put in reality, like the nose on their face.
An example of randomness is the big cement mixer of a massive steel drum with gravel sand water and cement powder, rotating whirling and whirling and whirling on and on and on, and it will never produce even just an amorphous one cell amoeba, much less the nose on the face of our near-sighted my opponents here and all atheists.
.
There is endless debate over God existing or not.
But there is no talk at all about how to concur on what it is or how to prove or disprove that something at all exists in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
I think I can and do so prove for myself that God exists, and you can also if you will concur with me on how to prove that something at all exists in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
Here is step #1 in proving or disproving that something at all, be it the nose in our face or God existing in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind:
#1 Parties engaged in proving or disproving something to exist must first work to concur on the concept of the thing, anything at all be it the nose in our face or God, otherwise it is an insane exchange of thoughts because parties will be talking past each other's head, and that is not communication at all or getting connected at all.What do you guys here say?
When you accept my step #1, then I will or you guys here can propose step #2 for us all to work on to concur on it.
Time to go to the OP again, and it is about:
- The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not.
Step No. 1 consists in working together among all parties of concern, on the mutually agreed on concept of God.
Here is again my concept of God:
- God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
What about you guys here, what is your information on the concept of God, take notice, I say your information, not that you have a convinced concept of God: so, no need to insist that you don't accept God exists, wherefore you have no concept of God.
Now, if you insist that you don't have any information on any concept of God, well, then just read my concept of God above, okay?
There, now you have information on the concept of God, at least from yours truly who is a God knower.
from ch33zw1z Yesterday at 3:09 AM #472
- Marius Dejess said:
Time to go to the OP again, and it is about:
The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not.
Step No. 1 consists in working together among all parties of concern, on the mutually agreed on concept of God.
Here is again my concept of God:
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
What about you guys here, what is your information on the concept of God, take notice, I say your information, not that you have a convinced concept of God: so, no need to insist that you don't accept God exists, wherefore you have no concept of God.
Now, if you insist that you don't have any information on any concept of God, well, then just read my concept of God above, okay?
There, now you have information on the concept of God, at least from yours truly who is a God knower.
Cool, prove God exists with tangible data that can be recreated over and over again.
================
Processed Cheese Ambassador to the Amused Fsck Off and Die Club