theflyingpig
Banned
- Mar 9, 2008
- 5,616
- 18
- 0
It does, actually. Now, why don't you go and post more of your incoherent ranting. It amuses me.
I spent three years there and will be going back once I'm done school. I've experienced the war and have had friends die, and have lost contact with others in Gaza. The difference is I don't feel the need to brag about my past due to some perceived notion if I do it will make me more "authenticate" on a message board like you do. You trivialize it, wear it like a badge, you really don't understand its horror. The world would be much better without war, but it would also be foolish to think that if you stop fighting everyone else will. (Right now anyway, hopefully in the future it will come to that.)
You can't call people bloodthirsty when you support there actions. That makes you a hypocrite now as well.
Perfect then, go back there and bow to your Third Reich leaders and go forth to murder der untermensch as the teaching of your God & prophet Jesus.
You are a perfect example of inferiority complex who feel that the world owe you a living because you happens to knew someone that may have been around at the same time as the Holocaust.
Using your ideology, the German & Russian have every right to wipe out the trouble making Jews.
Now who is all high and mighty? You are pathetic. As I said, unlike you, I don't wear my past as a badge.
Wow, hopefully that phrase was used with full knowlege of it's implications, and therefore sarcastically...
So what the hell with so many treads that you create/post for?
PS. What past, you are still wet behind the ear to have a past.
Martin Luther King galvanized an already militant black society. You cannot speak of Martin Luther King without also speaking of Malcolm X and of the Black Panthers, and of the all black unions, and of the militant notion of black power that was bred out of the 30's and 40's.
Ghandi, I cannot discuss as in depth sadly, though I am sure you can find a militant attitude, or militant force working with the same ideas as him that gave his ideas a "bite" that words themselves just do not have.
For someone who seems to enjoy calling people out on useless "tough talk" you have enough of your own for people that challenge your ego.
This.
We did not have to kill most of the Native Americans, they died by the airborn germs that the settlers brought from Europe. And when they did kill without mercy, they did it because they were pigs like you without moral code or sense of justice, and that was viewed as acceptable centuries ago because that was just how shit went down back then, there was no accountability. Israel would never be able to permanently end this conflict by brute force and merciless killing, they would have to wipe out Iran, Iraq, and the multiple other fighters that would gladly lay down their life to help their oppressed muslim brothers. Your ideas to end this conflict are beyond retarded.
Martin Luther King you have an argument on, but not Ghandi. To my knowledge, albiet limited, Ghandi did indeed "win" by using his ideology and words. If there were any militants, they were such a minority that they really didn't have any "bite".
Yes, both of those leaders and their philosophies had their roots in militant organisations, but (especially in the case of Ghandi) they were a reaction to it rather than an element of it. Either movement could easily have been wiped out by the much more powerful opposition if they had continued to use violence, but their non-violent methods made that morally and politically unacceptable. It is certainly not true that pacifists never win, and in fact, I think the only way left for the Palestinians to survive is to adopt non-violence. Israel has an excuse (although some would say not a particularly good one) to kill the civilians due to the presence of militants in their midst, but how long would it be allowed to continue if there were no more militants? How many thousands of deaths and how many destroyed homes and schools would it take before the world, even America, said enough is enough?
fallout man
Golden Member
- Nov 20, 2007
- 1,787
- 1
- 0
Well you are in agreement than with a majority of the people of Israel who would support peace and would willingly give up the land if the violence stopped. If this truce holds, if it actually becomes viable, I expect to see a two state solution rather quickly as the people of both sides want two things. Safety, and peace, and in that order.
I think Israel would have to be stopped by international pressure and possibly sanctions - they would not stop themselves. If they just wanted to kill the Hamas leaders they could have sent special forces or undercover intelligence operatives to assasinate them. It seems to me the aim is kill as many civilians as is politically acceptable. A non-violent Palestine would lower this acceptable number.
Well I suppose we can hope for that, but the fact is there are thousands of young men in Palestine now who have just lost their parents and siblings and wives and children to Israeli bombs, and they will most likely now live only for revenge. Perhaps a Ghandi-like leader could convince these people that there is honor in non-violence as well as revenge but I don't see such a person emerging.
kylebisme
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
You are the hypocrite for only condemning the bloodthirsty actions of terrorists but not of tyrants, I don't condone either. However, you are so delusional that you can't even comprehend the meaning of the word "condone" so I can't rightly expect you to understand anything I say.
Still more personal attacks? I have expressed sympathy at the loss of life in Palestine and wish very much that Hamas fought Israel as an open army instead of hiding behind innocents. You on the other hand cheer the use of innocents by Hamas and enjoy the blood shed in your quest for a war of against Israel of what you perceive as "fair".
You are a bloodthirsty hypocrite.
More off base remarks. It's ok and I sympathize with your lack of understand about yourself. It must be hard to have to go through a phase of self understanding where you realize you are what you hate.
kylebisme
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
I sympathize with your inability to grasp reality, as evidenced by your inability to comprehend the meaning of the word "condone" as demonstrated here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...AR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
I suppose I should just put that in a signature to demonstrate how delusional you are to others.
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...AR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
I suppose I should just put that in a signature to demonstrate how delusional you are to others.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter