The most overrated books of all time?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sash1

Diamond Member
Jul 20, 2001
8,896
1
0
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Have any English majors posted in this thread?

i'm majoring in english at Wake right now. heh

with that said: wuthering heights. pure sh!t
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Anything written by King in the past two decades, anything written by Dan Brown, ever. It figures you guys would be trashing on the classics.
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
Originally posted by: sash1
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Have any English majors posted in this thread?

i'm majoring in english at Wake right now. heh

with that said: wuthering heights. pure sh!t

I just finished up a Bronte class, and if you think Wuthering Heights is bad, read Jane Eyre. Wuthering Heights was a breath of fresh eyre after that.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
The books being mentioned in this thread are renowned because they opened up new genres of literature---people saying they are "overrated" apparently don't have the knowledge required to know what they're talking about.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
I actually enjoyed most of the required reading in HS / college.

Except catcher in the rye, which blew donkies. Sorry.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
every book I had to read in school:

Starting with Wuthering Heights. Followed by Pride and Prejudice, the Crucible, Old Man and the Sea, and the host of others I was fortunately able to forget. The only book that remotely held my interest was Lord of the Flies.

Not really sure how I feel about all the Shakespeare they forced down my gullet. Never understood the funny talk so I can't say if I think the works suck or not.

In some ways it's a shame they force us to read some of the classics in school becuase no matter what we almost all end up hating the books we were forced to read in school. This despite the fact that some of them are indeed literary masterpieces which would be far better enjoyed if not "assigned" as work but "chosen" to be read.

Not true, I love many of the books I was exposed to in school. Not all, but most.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
Jonathan Livingston Seagull FTL! Followed by,
The Great Gatsby and,
The Three Musketeers.

I LOVE Bach and Dumas. Completely agree about Gatsby though. Worst. Novel. Ever.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,904
31,429
146
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
Jonathan Livingston Seagull FTL! Followed by,
The Great Gatsby and,
The Three Musketeers.

I LOVE Bach and Dumas. Completely agree about Gatsby though. Worst. Novel. Ever.

well, that's just, like, your opinion, man... :p
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Camus' Stranger could have made its point as a short story, IMO. I never could get through it.

Strongly disagree with OP on his choices, I would guess that he simply doesn't like twentieth century creative fiction.

As for me I think the worst most highly read book I ever finished would have to be Davinci code. God what an awful book, a coworker asked me to read it, and for his sake I did. Never again.
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Actually I've read everything that Salinger ever published, and I didn't like Catcher the first time that much.

I really think what's going on with Catcher is that people with a background in literature read it and fall in love with it, then they force it down the throats of adolescents because they think they'll relate to it. From this many end up absolutely despising Catcher and it's numerous derivatives.

The secret to Salinger is to start with the short stories, move on to the Glass family novels and end at catcher. No wonder he stopped publishing... he was done... he finished the story.

When he dies I fully expect a ton of mindless drivel to come out with Salinger on it... it will probably permanently ruin him for history....

blah... back to work for me. :/
 

jandrews

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2007
1,313
0
0
Funny, I totally agree with the OP, also if ayn rand's Atlas Shrugged would be counted as a classic I would put that at the top of the list. I finished Grapes of Wrath on my own but I had to begrudge myself at each turn to get through the sheer boredom.
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Literary snobs are amusing.

I agree, and the cult of anti-intellectualism is depressing. God forbid anyone should critically analyze anything.

:roll:
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,075
19,398
136
Originally posted by: NeuroSynapsis
Catch 22. The text/value ratio was horrible.

You're crazy, Catch 22 was fantastic.

Catcher in the Rye I thought was meh. Didn't hate it, didn't like it. I read it the year after I graduated from high school to see what all the hub-bub was about. Turns out that people just have sticks up their butts.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,904
31,429
146
Originally posted by: djheater
Actually I've read everything that Salinger ever published, and I didn't like Catcher the first time that much.

I really think what's going on with Catcher is that people with a background in literature read it and fall in love with it, then they force it down the throats of adolescents because they think they'll relate to it. From this many end up absolutely despising Catcher and it's numerous derivatives.

The secret to Salinger is to start with the short stories, move on to the Glass family novels and end at catcher. No wonder he stopped publishing... he was done... he finished the story.

When he dies I fully expect a ton of mindless drivel to come out with Salinger on it... it will probably permanently ruin him for history....

blah... back to work for me. :/

I have a background in literature and I'm quite neutral towards Catcher in the Rye.

but yeah...once Salinger kicks the bucket a lot of crap is finally going to be published

similar to the problem people have with Joyce--they read Ulysses, and b/c they have no hope of understanding it (certainly nothing to be embarrassed about...) they won't read Dubliners.

"The Dead" is sex via the English language.