snoopy7548
Diamond Member
- Jan 1, 2005
- 8,061
- 5,057
- 146
Meth. You are smoking meth right?Lots of name calling... the sign of brilliance. The left has made several subjects too taboo to discuss. In the video an example was given where one person was even fired for using science to explain why men tend to make more in their lifetimes. When it comes to certain subjects the liberals are no better than flat earthers.
Serious question, when have you ever made a post without namecalling?
For example, right here you just accused people of holding beliefs that they already told you they don't hold, and then called them flat earthers (which, ironically, is a conservative movement).
BTW sociology is no more real science than Scientology is.
A great short video. It explains how the left has made some subjects too taboo to even bring up and study. A pretty interesting part was that the fact-seeking, not-emotion-driven and tolerant leftest company Google fired an employee for daring to use basic science to explain why men earn more money compared to women in their lifetimes, generally speaking.
An eye opening part for me was the stat that one is more likely to be taught sociology in college by a Marxist than a Republican.
Academia has been taken over by people that value feelings over logic in certain cases. The result of everyone getting a trophy.
You can't get a PHD from Harvard Stanford etc in Scientology but you can in sociology. So what does that tell you? Well it tells me you are wrong.
so says prof slowNo, political science, sociology, etc. are bullshit. Just because you can get a degree in bullshit doesn't mean it isn't bullshit.
so says prof slow
There is no one who knows a job or profession better than someone who is ignorant and has never done it.
There is no one who knows a job or profession better than someone who is ignorant and has never done it.
He really is a great example of the Dunning-Krueger effect.
a systematically organized body of knowledge on a particular subject.
"the science of criminology"
Wow, people that believe in their own bullshit, go figure. I don't need to be a psychic to understand psychics are bullshit. There are dots to connect here.
You are willfully ignorant and proud of it. I just called your bullshit with sociology and you can find a dictionary and argue with it. An argument from a lack of knowledge and comprehension is what you put forward with predictable results.
Pseudoscience can still have value. Sociology doesn't meet the standards to call it a true science but does feature some of the methods of science and does have some amount of predictive power (in some cases). Being a science doesn't make it more important, there's not much science involved in most art but our world is made a lot better with Monet paintings in it.
Wow, people that believe in their own bullshit, go figure. I don't need to be a psychic to understand psychics are bullshit. There are dots to connect here.
Shit man, the dots weren't that far a part, but you still couldn't get the line drawn.
Pseudoscience can still have value.
Pseudoscience can still have value. Sociology doesn't meet the standards to call it a true science but does feature some of the methods of science and does have some amount of predictive power (in some cases). Being a science doesn't make it more important, there's not much science involved in most art but our world is made a lot better with Monet paintings in it.
I don't have to be a psychic to understand that you're full of it.
Here you're about as accurate as one, though.
Ah, so you actually believe in psychics. Interesting.
No, I don't. No reread in that context.
This guy spyder is more delusional than the wackjob conservatives on my FB feed. Holy jeezus.