I see this thread all the time, don't worry I won't load it up full of crap
🙂 I'm just being honest.
Value gamer gets better options elsewhere if they're smart
And the general public who literally have no clue because they only do email/office/facebook won't know anyway
http://www.thinkcomputers.org/amd-kaveri-a10-7850k-and-a10-7700k-prices-revealed/
If this is true, then :
$190 7850K
$50 mobo (?? why pay more for a system of this type?)
So $240 for a meh combo. Compare to :
$90 760K Richland
$50 mobo (same mobo of course)
$100 7790 1GB GDDR5
Eh? And you
don't even need anything more than budget 1333/1600 memory and
stock clocks to get fantastic entry-level performance from a 760K + 7790 combo. Standard daily usage will be roughly equal from a general use perspective, but for gamers the 7790 GDDR5 will absolutely dominate the Kaveri.
That's why I can't get any excitement from this. It's not like the righteous 8800GTX or 290X launch, or seeing a kickbutt new CPU release that blows the doors off of the predecessor (a la Athlon 64, Conroe, Phenom II vs. PhI, Celeron 300A, Sandy Bridge). It's not even a moderately impressive release in performance terms. It's more of a 'look at that, integrated GPU is now slightly less terrible than the last time, woohoo'.
In fact, the only thing I can see about this is that it will at least offer some interesting choices in budget notebooks? Would I rather have a well built Kaveri notebook instead of a Pentium Dual core or i3? Sure! But still, it wouldn't thrill me. I'd be shocked to see a budget notebook even ship with DDR3-1866, let alone the 2133/2400 or quad channel you need to really get passable.
Respectfully not trying to be a troll, that's just honestly how I feel.