• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Page 83 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Starbuck1975 said:
Both are job interviews, the hiring managers are simply different. The Democrats managed to invent a tribunal standard to politically weaponize #metoo. Now, Democrats down ballet can hypocritically rationalize why they are not holding Biden to the standard even he advocated.

It’s not surprising that Democrats are attacking the character of the accuser. Standard play.

I hope for your sake a formal complaint doesn’t surface. The “exhaustive” vetting of Biden already overlooked one document.
Click to expand...
I mean she originally claimed a formal complaint existed but has since changed her story and said no such complaint exists and that even the ‘intake form’ she filled out doesn’t include any accusations of assault.

It seems that by saying a formal complaint exists you are accusing Reade of lying, which is odd for a person arguing she should be believed, haha.
 
Lol we are hardly attacking her character. When it’s her own words that more than enough to disprove her motives and accuracy of her story.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
Both are job interviews, the hiring managers are simply different. The Democrats managed to invent a tribunal standard to politically weaponize #metoo. Now, Democrats down ballet can hypocritically rationalize why they are not holding Biden to the standard even he advocated.

It’s not surprising that Democrats are attacking the character of the accuser. Standard play.

I hope for your sake a formal complaint doesn’t surface. The “exhaustive” vetting of Biden already overlooked one document.
Click to expand...


Yeh, let's talk about so-called liberal hypocrisy rather than the veracity of the accusations. That's whataboutism, and has been all along.
 
sandorski said:
I don't know what to tell you. Everyone else knows why she was there.
Click to expand...

You see, we can provide links to where Tara has called for Biden to resign/dropout, you can’t do the same for ford and instead have to assume you know why she came forward. That’s called motivated reasoning and you and your band of useful idiots have been doing that the whole time.

www.cnn.com

Tara Reade says Joe Biden should drop out of 2020 race: 'You should not be running on character'

Tara Reade, a former Senate aide who has accused Joe Biden of sexually assaulting her in 1993, said in a new interview that the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee should withdraw from the 2020 race.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com

www.businessinsider.com

Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford say their client is not interested in seeing Brett Kavanaugh impeached from the Supreme Court

Christine Blasey Ford expresses disinterest in Kavanaugh's impeachment, focusing on her advocacy work instead.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
 
ivwshane said:
You see, we can provide links to where Tara has called for Biden to resign/dropout, you can’t do the same food ford and instead have to assume you know why she came forward. That’s called motivated reasoning and you and your band of useful idiots have been doing that the whole time.

www.businessinsider.com

Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford say their client is not interested in seeing Brett Kavanaugh impeached from the Supreme Court

Christine Blasey Ford expresses disinterest in Kavanaugh's impeachment, focusing on her advocacy work instead.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
Click to expand...

Ok, so she didn't, just those who fought to bring her there. Still not an indicator on whether Reade's Allegation is true or not.
 
fskimospy said:
Also Reade’s attorney has confirmed that the check fraud charges are real.

She has...some explaining to do.
Click to expand...
People who engage in fraud can also get sexually assaulted or harassed. If she was dismissed on ethical grounds, I am sure Biden’s office can provide ample documentation to back it.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
People who engage in fraud can also get sexually assaulted or harassed. If she was dismissed on ethical grounds, I am sure Biden’s office can provide ample documentation to back it.
Click to expand...
No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.

Regardless, the timing sure is interesting, as is the continuing pattern of deception by Reade.
 
fskimospy said:
No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.

Regardless, the timing sure is interesting, as is the continuing pattern of deception by Reade.
Click to expand...

It's all bullshit. The stealth edit of her Medium piece shot her credibility right in the ass. Intent to deceive is obvious.
 
fskimospy said:
No, probably not as they already said they don’t have personnel files. In addition governments are often not allowed to discuss the particulars of why someone was terminated.

Regardless, the timing sure is interesting, as is the continuing pattern of deception by Reade.
Click to expand...
Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.

The timing is inconvenient for Biden. That is not Reade’s problem.
 
ivwshane said:
I’ll take a link for that claim.
Click to expand...
I can’t link you to common sense. Kavanaugh held a number of prominent government positions, and was floated on a few short lists as under consideration for SCOTUS. The accusations only surfaced after he received the nomination. People are questioning why Reade has chosen to come forward now. That same reasoning applies to Dr. Ford.
 
Jhhnn said:
And the whataboutism double down.
Click to expand...

It is all part of the same issue. If talking about the hypocrisy between how the same people have dealt with Ford and Reade is "whataboutism", then so is talking about Reade's various life events and her Sexual Assault allegation. You can't have it both ways.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.

The timing is inconvenient for Biden. That is not Reade’s problem.
Click to expand...
The timing of when Reade was charged with a crime is a problem for her, not Biden, haha.

It’s especially interesting that it’s fundamentally a crime of deception, similar to when she stole from her other employer through deception, how she deceptively edited her writings to support her new allegations, her deceptive claims that those weird Russia writings, etc. If you are still trying to claim this history isn’t troubling you’re full of shit.

You guys hitched your hopes to someone who turned out to be a lifelong grifter. That was a mistake.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
Even assuming there are no personnel files, I am sure someone working in Biden’s office at that time could validate the circumstances of her dismissal.

The timing is inconvenient for Biden. That is not Reade’s problem.
Click to expand...
No but it is Reades problem that she has made this political......you can`t have it both ways......Reade herself made it political.....
 
sandorski said:
It is all part of the same issue. If talking about the hypocrisy between how the same people have dealt with Ford and Reade is "whataboutism", then so is talking about Reade's various life events and her Sexual Assault allegation. You can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...
Hogwash. Her stealth edit of her Medium piece is an attempt to deceive. Plain as day. The rest shows it's a pattern of deviant behavior.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
I can’t link you to common sense. Kavanaugh held a number of prominent government positions, and was floated on a few short lists as under consideration for SCOTUS. The accusations only surfaced after he received the nomination. People are questioning why Reade has chosen to come forward now. That same reasoning applies to Dr. Ford.
Click to expand...


Except I already linked the words from both women and their reasons for coming forward now. Apparently you only believe women when it’s convenient. Maybe you should evaluate all relevant info before being a both sides bitch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top