The Islamic Rent-a-Wife program

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16717237/">WP: 'Enjoyment marriages' back in Iraq
Banned under Saddam Hussein, some say they are cover for prostitution
By Nancy Trejos
Washington Post Staff Writer
The Washington Post
Updated: 1:03 a.m. ET Jan 20, 2007</a>

BAGHDAD - Fatima Ali was a 24-year-old divorcee with no high school diploma and no job. Shawket al-Rubae was a 34-year-old Shiite sheik with a pregnant wife who, he said, could not have sex with him.

Ali wanted someone to take care of her. Rubae wanted a companion.

They met one afternoon in May at the house he shares with his wife, in the room where he accepts visitors seeking his religious counsel. He had a proposal. Would Ali be his temporary wife? He would pay her 5,000 Iraqi dinars upfront ? about $4 ? in addition to her monthly expenses. About twice a week over the next eight months, he would summon her to a house he would rent.

The negotiations took an hour and ended with an unwritten agreement, the couple recalled. Thus began their "mutaa," or enjoyment marriage, a temporary union believed by Shiite Muslims to be sanctioned by Islamic law.

The Shiite practice began 1,400 years ago, in what is now Iraq and other parts of the region, as a way to provide for war widows. Banned by President Saddam Hussein's Sunni-led government, it has regained popularity since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq brought the majority Shiites to power, said clerics, women's rights activists and mutaa spouses.

"During Saddam's time, there was no religious freedom," said Faris al-Shareef, a sheik who lives in the mainly Shiite city of Hilla.

Opponents of mutaa, most of them Sunni Arabs, say it is less about religious freedom and more about economic exploitation. Thousands of men are dying in the sectarian violence that has followed the invasion, leaving behind widows who must fend for themselves. Many young men are out of work and prefer temporary over permanent wives who require long-term financial commitments. In a mutaa arrangement, the woman is entitled to payment only for the duration of the marriage.

'A cover for prostitution'
"It's a cover for prostitution," said Um Akram, a women's rights activist in Baghdad. "Some women, because they don't want to be prostitutes, they think that this is legal because it's got some kind of religious cover. But it is wrong, and they're still prostitutes from the society's point of view." Um Akram, like the mutaa spouses interviewed, asked that only parts of her name be published.

Many intellectuals consider ancient traditions such as these an obstacle to Iraq's effort to become a more modern, democratic society. In recent years, extremist religious groups have gained more power in Iraq.

"These steps are taking the whole country backwards and are definitely hurdles to the advancement of the country," said Hamdia Ahmed, a former member of parliament and a women's rights activist in Baghdad. "The only solution is to separate Islam from politics."

Shiite clerics and others who practice mutaa say such marriages are keeping young women from having unwed sex and widowed or divorced women from resorting to prostitution to make money.:laugh:

They say a mutaa marriage is not much different from a traditional marriage in which the husband pays the wife's family a dowry and provides for her financially.

"It was designed as a humanitarian help for women," said Mahdi al-Shog, a Shiite cleric.

According to Shiite religious law, a mutaa relationship can last for a few minutes or several years. A man can have an unlimited number of mutaa wives and a permanent wife at the same time. A woman can have only one husband at a time, permanent or temporary. No written contract or official ceremony is required in a mutaa. When the time limit ends, the man and woman go their separate ways with none of the messiness of a regular divorce.

Temporary arrangements
Although the temporary arrangements are becoming more common, they are still controversial, and people usually conduct them secretly.

Ali had a normal marriage once. It lasted only three months because the couple did not get along. Her chances for another permanent marriage, she said, were slim. Men often prefer virgins over widows and divorced women, she said.

She welcomed Rubae's proposal because he was a well-known sheik in her neighborhood. Her family was fond of him. "He was a good guy, and he was a religious man," she said.


Rubae had been in 15 mutaa marriages before. A year ago he entered into a permanent marriage with a woman who had been his mutaa wife for a day. When she became pregnant eight months ago, she suggested he take a temporary wife but asked him not to tell her if he did. She does not know about his involvement with Ali.

"As a pregnant woman, she cannot give me my needs," Rubae said. "She treats me real good and she wants me to be happy."

He chose Ali partly because her blond hair, light brown eyes and petite figure had always attracted him. "When she puts makeup on, it destroys her beauty," he said.

He also liked that she was religiously devout, and he said he wanted to keep her from a relationship outside of marriage.

Ali didn't think of him in a romantic way at first. "After we got married, I started loving him," she said.

Money tight
The money he gave her helped. Her father owns a bakery but money has always been tight, so much so that she had to end her education after elementary school. But money wasn't her only reason for entering the enjoyment marriage. "I have needs just like any other woman," she said.

Both Shiite and Sunni Muslims allow men to have more than one permanent wife, but they disagree over mutaa.

Most Shiites believe that the prophet Muhammad encouraged the practice as a way to give widows an income. Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, Iraq's most revered Shiite cleric, has sanctioned it and offers advice on his Web site.

Um Ahmed, a 28-year-old woman from Najaf, lost her husband in 2005 when he was caught in the crossfire of a fight between two Shiite militias.

Soon after his death, she had her first mutaa relationship, with a man who was in a permanent marriage. He paid her 50,000 Iraqi dinars upfront ? or $38 ? and gave her money whenever she needed it during their six-month relationship.

She said she needed it often. She is a tailor and the only one in her family of 10 who works.

"When a human being needs money, the need will make a person do anything," she said. "It's better than doing the wrong things. This is religiously accepted."

Many Sunnis believe that the practice is outdated and ripe for abuse. They also see it as more evidence of Iranian influence on Iraqi life. Mutaa is widespread in Iran's Shiite theocratic state.

'Big insult to women'
"It is a big insult to women," said Ibtsam Z. Alsha, a Sunni lawyer and the head of the organization Women for the Common Good of Women.

Women's rights activists also bemoan what they say is an increase in mutaa on college campuses. Some female students do it for money. Others do it for love when their parents forbid them to marry a man from another sect.

Amani, a 22-year-old Baghdad University engineering student, said she is a Sunni but agreed to enter into a mutaa relationship with her Shiite boyfriend because her parents disapproved of him. "I hated my family because they did not allow this marriage," she said. "I did this to spite my family."

Still, she has not told them about the relationship. "If they find out, it will be my end," she said.
:Q

A woman cannot terminate a temporary marriage before it expires unless the man agrees, said four sheiks interviewed for this article.


Once the marriage is over, she has to wait at least two menstrual cycles before she can have another relationship so that paternity can be easily determined if she becomes pregnant, they said.

Most mutaa contracts stipulate that no children be produced. If a woman were to become pregnant anyway, Islamic law would require the man to support the child, the sheiks said. But the clerics disagreed over how much power they have to impose that rule.

Rubae said the man who refuses his child would be whipped or even killed. "We as the sheiks should be sure this thing will stay legitimate," he said.

Rules enforcement
Shareef, the sheik from Hilla, said some men take advantage of their rights under religious law but refuse to accept their responsibility when a child is born. In some of those cases, he said, a sharia court, using Islamic law, is not as effective as a secular court in enforcing the rules.

"I am supporting the idea of the government regulating mutaa marriages, just like the permanent marriages, so these man cannot run away," he said. "Otherwise the women are losing their rights."

Um Akram, the women's rights activist in Baghdad, said more women are asking her organization for help in getting national identification cards for children born of mutaa relationships. Parents must present a marriage certificate to obtain the identification cards, which are required by schools and employers.

Um Akram said some single women have given up their children for adoption to married couples who can use their marriage certificates to register them.

"The men just hit and run, and they don't want to have a family," she said. "The children are paying the price."

Ali and Rubae agreed not to have children. They simply wanted to enjoy each other.:evil:

On the days he could see her, he gave her flowers, perfume, clothing and a watch. They had meals together. Sometimes he could spend the whole day with her. Other times, just five or six hours.

Ali said she cried when the marriage ended early last week. "It's just like a permanent marriage," she said. "When he leaves, I become sad."

Her sorrow did not last long. Rubae said Jan. 12 that he had decided to marry her again. This time, he said, he would marry her for a year, enough time for his wife to fully recover from childbirth

No matter how perfect one claims their religion or religious book to be unless it is kept separate from government it can and will be abused.
These steps are taking the whole country backwards and are definitely hurdles to the advancement of the country," said Hamdia Ahmed, a former member of parliament and a women's rights activist in Baghdad. "The only solution is to separate Islam from politics."



So when is the rent-a-wife program coming to America:laugh:, and will they take trade-ins:evil:
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: 1prophet


So when is the rent-a-wife program coming to America:laugh:, and will they take trade-ins:evil:

Every religion has some good traits:evil:
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
ew.

it IS the economic exploitation of women

I mean seriously..."One day marraiges"?

Hey have your prostitution - but call it as it is...

makes me wonder if most wives even agres with this...because I sure as well find it hard for any women to agree to someting like this
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
These marriages are B.S if you want to look at it from a religious standpoint.

If you want to have sex before you are married, do not call yourself religious.
You cant bend some rules and not bend others.
 

firewall

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2001
2,099
0
0
Disgusting. Just another way to exploit women and legalize prostitution by calling it Mutaa.
 

steppinthrax

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2006
3,990
6
81
What is the difference between this and the prostitution that goes on in our very country. When we see countries like this do these things, especially considering we are at war with them we find it disgusting. They probably have been doing this for a long time now and we just now find out.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
I actually consider this a rather positive thing.

One, because I don't believe that prostitution truly should be illegal; I don't care what consenting adults choose to do with their bodies. I understand that this is a very idealistic stance that doesn't take into account the circumstances in which many women enter the profession, but I still can't fully condone making it illegal.

Two, because I believe that much of the martyr mentality of the Middle East is a result of repressed sexual longing and, frankly, jealousy of us for not having to share in that.

More info: Hot for martyrdom: Possibly the best explanation of what drives Islamic extremists I've ever read.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I agree its simply prostitution...but so what? Prostitution comes in many forms...take a woman out for a fancy dinner and shower her for gifts in the hopes she'll put out? At least with an escort/prostitute you KNOW what youre getting...I personally dont see the big deal. This whole women getting exploited BS is simply not the norm. There have been so many documentaries and such proving that. Sure, there IS some exploitation, but give me a break. It's a minority.

Anyway. I digress.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: magomago
I mean seriously..."One day marraiges"?

Even less :)

The fact that this is a cover for prostitution was made clear by the statement that "... a mutaa relationship can last for a few minutes ...".

They are making a joke of marriage by calling this a temporary marriage.

I was wondering why the Sauddis consider Shiite immoral; I guess this is one reason.
 

fallenangel99

Golden Member
Aug 8, 2001
1,721
1
81
Hmm.. do you know how many men in the US would do something like this? LOTS would be willing to pay $4 to another woman for enjoyment.. It happens here in the U.S., just that its not under the cover of religion.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: magomago
ew.

it IS the economic exploitation of women

I mean seriously..."One day marraiges"?

Hey have your prostitution - but call it as it is...

makes me wonder if most wives even agres with this...because I sure as well find it hard for any women to agree to someting like this

Originally posted by: Aimster
These marriages are B.S if you want to look at it from a religious standpoint.

If you want to have sex before you are married, do not call yourself religious.
You cant bend some rules and not bend others.

Originally posted by: firewall
Disgusting. Just another way to exploit women and legalize prostitution by calling it Mutaa.

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I have no problem with sexual activity performed by consenting adults.

[trolling comments removed]
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
I think the fundamental difference is that these Shiites are pushing prostitution as the solution for divorced or widowed women in need.
Sure, you can say that poverty may have pushed women in the West to prostitute themselves, but at least it is not an option that is officially sanctioned by the state or even by society.

And yllus, it would be a mistake to regard such "marriages" as an act by two consenting adults, as only one of them holds the power, and that is the man with the money. Sure, you can say he is not forcing her, but fact is that the social norms were arranged in such a way that would force poor women to resort to such actions since it would seem there is no other options -- not even support networks.

Bottom line is that these horny guys aren't helping the poor women out of the goodness of their heart -- they are exploiting them, since they have the oppurtunity to do so.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Aimster
temporary marriage requires the woman's father's approval .......

Money Talks :( and considering we destroyed the economy of that country and hire illegal workers from other countries to do the labor of rebuilding.. what are they expected to do
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
Money Talks :( and considering we destroyed the economy of that country and hire illegal workers from other countries to do the labor of rebuilding.. what are they expected to do

Leaving your assertions aside, I would say that the horny Sheikh could create a charity for disadvantaged women. As for his "needs", I suggest he get acquainted with his five-finger princess.
 

CityShrimp

Member
Dec 14, 2006
177
0
0
They say a mutaa marriage is not much different from a traditional marriage in which the husband pays the wife's family a dowry and provides for her financially.

I think it's amusing that they tried to make a difference between Mutaa and prostitution by saying that the husband is financially responsible for the wife (even if its temporary). But...

A woman cannot terminate a temporary marriage before it expires unless the man agrees, said four sheiks interviewed for this article.

I assume, from this statement, that a man CAN terminate a Mutaa before it expires, so the financially responsible thing seems like a meaningless rule. :roll:
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: dahunan
Money Talks :( and considering we destroyed the economy of that country and hire illegal workers from other countries to do the labor of rebuilding.. what are they expected to do

Leaving your assertions aside, I would say that the horny Sheikh could create a charity for disadvantaged women. As for his "needs", I suggest he get acquainted with his five-finger princess.

"five finger princess" :laugh: .. that was good..

 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: CityShrimp
They say a mutaa marriage is not much different from a traditional marriage in which the husband pays the wife's family a dowry and provides for her financially.

I think it's amusing that they tried to make a difference between Mutaa and prostitution by saying that the husband is financially responsible for the wife (even if its temporary). But...

A woman cannot terminate a temporary marriage before it expires unless the man agrees, said four sheiks interviewed for this article.
- another great example of womans rights!!
I assume, from this statement, that a man CAN terminate a Mutaa before it expires, so the financially responsible thing seems like a meaningless rule. :roll:

 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: dna
I think the fundamental difference is that these Shiites are pushing prostitution as the solution for divorced or widowed women in need.
Sure, you can say that poverty may have pushed women in the West to prostitute themselves, but at least it is not an option that is officially sanctioned by the state or even by society.

And yllus, it would be a mistake to regard such "marriages" as an act by two consenting adults, as only one of them holds the power, and that is the man with the money. Sure, you can say he is not forcing her, but fact is that the social norms were arranged in such a way that would force poor women to resort to such actions since it would seem there is no other options -- not even support networks.

Bottom line is that these horny guys aren't helping the poor women out of the goodness of their heart -- they are exploiting them, since they have the oppurtunity to do so.


Pretty much status quo for that part of the world *shrug*
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: magomago
I mean seriously..."One day marraiges"?

Even less :)

The fact that this is a cover for prostitution was made clear by the statement that "... a mutaa relationship can last for a few minutes ...".

They are making a joke of marriage by calling this a temporary marriage.

I was wondering why the Sauddis consider Shiite immoral; I guess this is one reason.

Careful with that statement - I know many a Shi'ite, INCLUDING MYSELF who do not condone this at all...

And "Saudis" (however that is defined...I would think we are discussing only clerics who wield influence on the country) themselves are happy participants in bringing over young virgin "brides" for a night - muslim only of course...

Both acts are x_x IMO


Originally posted by: dna
I think the fundamental difference is that these Shiites are pushing prostitution as the solution for divorced or widowed women in need.
Sure, you can say that poverty may have pushed women in the West to prostitute themselves, but at least it is not an option that is officially sanctioned by the state or even by society.

And yllus, it would be a mistake to regard such "marriages" as an act by two consenting adults, as only one of them holds the power, and that is the man with the money. Sure, you can say he is not forcing her, but fact is that the social norms were arranged in such a way that would force poor women to resort to such actions since it would seem there is no other options -- not even support networks.

Bottom line is that these horny guys aren't helping the poor women out of the goodness of their heart -- they are exploiting them, since they have the oppurtunity to do so.

And That is why I said call it prostitution, rather than guise it under religion. It makes me wonder what is actually written on Sistani's website - because certain stipulations must exist and Aimster did point out one of them..and as dahunan later stated out, some of these conditions are ignored when compared to the "money talks" situation.

And dna - places in western society do sanction prostitution ;)