the IPOD nano uncertified Durability test: Drop it, Throw it, crash it...run it over with car...

[wasserkool]

http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars/3

:roll:

 

[Rogue]

Why the eye roll? Seems pretty impressive to me, although not entirely unexpected considering the thin, flat package it's built in.

 

[Lonyo]

That's actually quite useful.
I think more people should do durability tests, since people suck and often manage to drop things, and if it breaks easily, it's not worth much money, or you'd better get a decent warranty.

 

[AbAbber2k]

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=38&threadid=1687493&enterthread=y

SEARCH

 

[OREOSpeedwagon]

Originally posted by: Rogue
Why the eye roll? Seems pretty impressive to me, although not entirely unexpected considering the thin, flat package it's built in.

I think he's saying he would rather have the ipod nano than know how durable it is

 

[talyn00]

they never did any tests involving water...

 

[Rogue]

Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon

Originally posted by: Rogue
Why the eye roll? Seems pretty impressive to me, although not entirely unexpected considering the thin, flat package it's built in.

I think he's saying he would rather have the ipod nano than know how durable it is

I think so. I've never been an ipod fan, but the nano does make me want to consider one. Of course, I'd buy it for my wife and hope she wouldn't use it and if she did decide to, I'd have an excuse to buy my own. I love how marriage works sometimes.

 

[thirdlegstump]

Sounds like it's a mirror image of Apple as a company itself.

 

[zainali]

wow. seems like someones got money to burn.

 

[iamme]

Originally posted by: deathkoba
Sounds like it's a mirror image of Apple as a company itself.

:laugh:

 

[thirdlegstump]

Originally posted by: zainali
wow. seems like someones got money to burn.

Stupid boy. The article itself will pay for the Nano in 1 hour and promote further popularity of the site.