I figured this was gonna be about all the movies/documentaries/etc for brands, and the mythmaking like that. Shit like the Flamin Hot Cheetos movie, etc.
Most times, if I buy something that has a good brand name, I’ll take care of it better as it costs more. Like my ray ban sunglasses or Jordan’s. I still wear the same ray bans for almost a decade. I know people that will buy those 10 dollar sunglasses, trash em and buy new ones. Say you buy 10 per year. In 2 years, you’ll have paid for a pair of ray bans. I have 5 Lacoste polos that I rotate. I hand wash em. Bought em when the colors I want go on sale. Just my 2 cent.
You could've bought sunglasses that probably looked as good or better than the Ray Bans for cheaper and then you could both do what you do but also save a bunch of money. Luxottica makes most of the branded/designer sunglasses, and that's why branded Sunglass prices are the way they are, not because of quality of the product. Also, those people buy the cheap ones because they're probably prone to breaking/losing them, not for any supposedly quality, wherein they would've lost/broken the Ray Bans as well, and be out the $200 instead of $10.
Yeah. People are super reluctant to go with the not-so-popular option, even when it's far superior.
I feel like a frickin' snake oil salesman when I tell people how AMD gives you 16 threads in the same price that Intel gives 8 threads. They look at me like, what's he getting out of this???
Look up the story of snake oil, most people don't know that the originating snake oil actually did work.
Also, what if I told you, Intel offers more threads for the same price now? Well in some product segments. Actually, that makes me want to create a CPU company in Egypt, bragging about my thread count. Maybe name the CPUs "Cotton".
The one that humored me the most were the Beats headphones...everyone wanted them but they sounded like complete shit and you could easily get better sounding headphones for 1/2 the price....
When fitness trackers first started coming out, everyone had to have the the fitbit (which the battery lasted barely a week) but my garmin vivo had watch batteries that lasted over a year and also had an actual display and when even when I explained this to others (coworkers and friends), they still bought the fitbit because everyone had one...
Meh, that's not even the first of that in headphones. Beats was smart in that they picked features that made them easy to market to people such that many wouldn't even bother comparing them to other headphones just because of the features, plus they targeted sound that would have mass appeal (bass emphasis), and thus make comparisons to say cheap Airpod earbuds would easily make it seem like they sounded better. And with them focusing on flashy colors (and targeting sports) also managed to basically capture similar cultural vein that Starter jackets did in the 90s.
I feel like you're ignoring stuff like integration of apps, which alone was a big part of why Fitbit did well. Also, a lot of people got those because their work/health insurance partnered to give them away for free (or even discounts on your health care if you bought one). I also think you ignore that the lack of a display likely worked to its benefit, people didn't want something that felt like a watch to them.