KLin
Lifer
- Feb 29, 2000
- 30,427
- 745
- 126
Is this movie anything like Running Man with Arnold?
Read the book before seeing the movie. Seriously.
Is this movie anything like Running Man with Arnold?
Are you boys, I mean "men", really reading this shit?
yes, i almost had a seizure, sitting in the front row of IMAX didn't help of course
[SPOILER]
... Lots of bad editing and continuity errors. ...
Read the books. First book was "okay" and the other 2 were bleh. First book had some really bad writing, but wasn't bad enough I couldn't get through it. The second and third books were horribly written. Scenes jump around, shit just happens without any lead up or characters do things without reasons behind them. Was very frustrating. The love triangle was stupid and made me want to slit an emo kid's wrists.
I think the biggest problem I had with the books with the premise. The "story" has been done plenty of times in different ways. Really, if you think about it, it's nothing more than a gladiator version of Lord of the Flies. All the other stories mentioned thus far in this thread have the same concept. Only thing is I like the premise for those concepts much better. The premise for this one seems ridiculous most of the time. Completely ridiculous.
Besides a bad premise, horrible writing, and a love triangle that tries to match Twilight in stupidity, I still thought at least the first book was decent. I have no idea if the movie will be good. I'm leery of seeing it, but when I saw the good reviews for it so far being posted on Rottentomatoes and IMDB, I'm now a bit more curious as to why.
Looking for a decent movie to watch this weekend with the GF. Trying to decide between Hunger Games, 21 Jump Street, and The Raid: Redemption.
yes, i almost had a seizure, sitting in the front row of IMAX didn't help of course
Read the book before seeing the movie. Seriously.
I think I'll go see 21 Jump St. in the theatre
They said that most would die of natural causes, but not very many of them did.
I saw a bunch die with no cannon shot...including about 3 in a very short period.
Lots of bad editing and continuity errors. The girl immediately started climbing down toward the cloud of deadly wasps, but they were all gone when she got down. In another scene, I saw her draw her bow and exhale, then it cuts to her drawing the bow again and exhaling again. The dead people had no remaining wasps on them. Her companion was down there with the same people who got stung and died, but he didn't get stung.
Her little kid friend was snared and making a lot of noise, and died quickly because of it. They weren't far away from people who were chasing after them. Instead of leaving the area, she stuck around and grieved, then made a small memorial. It doesn't seem like she was taking this survival thing seriously...so why should the viewer take it seriously? It was later revealed that other people MUST have been in the area to see Rue die...but they didn't take advantage of Katniss' vulnerability. Doesn't make sense.
I thought 21 Jump Street was good, and worth seeing if you like some juvenile humor.
There shouldn't be a need to. If the movie is good then it should be able to stand on its own.
My only real gripe with the movie is the cinematography. It's annoying after a while with everything being so zoomed in.
You think everyone needed to read The Shining before watching the movie?
My only real gripe with the movie is the cinematography. It's annoying after a while with everything being so zoomed in.