The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. New trailer.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Slickone

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 1999
6,120
0
0
I don't quite understand the "too long" statements. If you like the story, how can it be too long? If you don't like the story, why are you watching it?
Whatever was drug out was still very entertaining. It's not like they went grocery shopping or something.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
I really wanted to like the first one, but it was twice as long as it needed to be. Throwing in all the backstory that Tolkien didn't put in his story doesn't make your story a better story.

I enjoyed the first movie simply because I am a fan of the novels and I like the setting. However, I was really disappointed with the way the addition of Radagast was handled and to a lesser extent with the mountain rock monsters. Radagast was Peter Jackson's Jar Jar Binks moment. In the novel the rock monsters weren't moving pieces of mountain but rather giants throwing stones off in the distance.

I hope the second one is better. Can't wait to see Bilbo's conversation with Smaug.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
I enjoyed the first movie simply because I am a fan of the novels and I like the setting. However, I was really disappointed with the way the addition of Radagast was handled and to a lesser extent with the mountain rock monsters. Radagast was Peter Jackson's Jar Jar Binks moment. In the novel the rock monsters weren't moving pieces of mountain but rather giants throwing stones off in the distance.

I hope the second one is better. Can't wait to see Bilbo's conversation with Smaug.

Yeah, but Jackson can't help that shit. His vision has always been a little over the top. Like the scene in Bag End where Frodo pisses Gandalf off and the wizards body seems to stretch up to the ceiling and thunder peals as his face grows dark.

Or the scene with Frodo and Galadriel at the mirror, when he offers her the ring and she momentarily turns into some sort of green glowing witch with an electronically modified voice.

Part of Tolkien's genius was that his world was _not_ filled with flashy effects and magical spectacle. How many times did Gandalf even use overt magic in the entire series? Not that many.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,891
31,410
146
Yeah, but Jackson can't help that shit. His vision has always been a little over the top. Like the scene in Bag End where Frodo pisses Gandalf off and the wizards body seems to stretch up to the ceiling and thunder peals as his face grows dark.

So you're saying Gandalf really is a conjurer of cheap tricks?

:hmm:
 

bearxor

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2001
6,605
3
81
I saw this yesterday and I have to say I quite enjoyed it much more than the first one.

I saw the HFR 3D version and it was greatly improved over the first one as well. It only took a few minutes before I didn't "notice" it.
 

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,582
4
81
Yeah, but Jackson can't help that shit. His vision has always been a little over the top. Like the scene in Bag End where Frodo pisses Gandalf off and the wizards body seems to stretch up to the ceiling and thunder peals as his face grows dark.

Or the scene with Frodo and Galadriel at the mirror, when he offers her the ring and she momentarily turns into some sort of green glowing witch with an electronically modified voice.

Part of Tolkien's genius was that his world was _not_ filled with flashy effects and magical spectacle. How many times did Gandalf even use overt magic in the entire series? Not that many.

mostly agree with this. i dont love pj as a director but he could be worse. sometimes.

going to see part II today with the kids, 3d IMAX in raleigh. hopefully it will be fun
 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
5
61
I saw this yesterday and I have to say I quite enjoyed it much more than the first one.

I saw the HFR 3D version and it was greatly improved over the first one as well. It only took a few minutes before I didn't "notice" it.

Same here.
 

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,582
4
81
I hope the second one is better. Can't wait to see Bilbo's conversation with Smaug.

not bad, imo, but not memorable. enjoyed the movie overall.

the 3d imax viewing was pretty cool. like some parts and not others, dont feel like getting into spoilers now really but:

i liked the confrontation between gandalf and sauron a lot more in this than i liked that craptastic wizard-whirl between he and saruman in the LOTR film.
 

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
I saw it yesterday. It was quite captivating and the 3D actions was pretty good, however to me LOTR trilogy was more well done.

I would give it 8/10, while all 3 of the LOTR series are at least 9/10 in my book.
 

ringtail

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2012
1,030
34
91
Repeatedly tried, but can't FORCE myself to read those books...so I'm virgin to the movies, with no preconceptions.

Desolation in big screen 3D was generally excellent, and W-A-Y better than the irritatingly cutsey 1st movie.

Fight scene action made up for time-fillers like the bear guy,
the spiders, Gandolf v Orcs in the ruins ...which all seemed like useless time-wasters to me but maybe those are there because people who read the book(s) would look for those and enjoy them?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,891
31,410
146
Is it better than the previews?

It is a cartoon in the previews. I'm hoping for something in film stock.
 

stag3

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2005
3,623
0
76
for some reason i liked the first one more, i think it's because i saw this one in 3d and while it didn't make me dizzy, it just was just "off" to me and really fake looking.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,891
31,410
146
for some reason i liked the first one more, i think it's because i saw this one in 3d and while it didn't make me dizzy, it just was just "off" to me and really fake looking.

ah, so it is what I saw in the previews (Even when it wasn't in 3D.)

gross
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,803
20,407
146
Repeatedly tried, but can't FORCE myself to read those books...so I'm virgin to the movies, with no preconceptions.

Desolation in big screen 3D was generally excellent, and W-A-Y better than the irritatingly cutsey 1st movie.

Fight scene action made up for time-fillers like the bear guy,
the spiders, Gandolf v Orcs in the ruins ...which all seemed like useless time-wasters to me but maybe those are there because people who read the book(s) would look for those and enjoy them?

Time fillers like the "bear guy" and the spiders...You should read the books.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,803
20,407
146
I saw this on Saturday. It was ok, it was cartooney, not sure how much I like it. I'll still watch the third because I like the books and stories by Tolkien.

One complaint was how outrageous the fight scenes were. Legolas and Tauriel are killing machines that don't break a sweat, and don't have a spec of Orc blood on them. In fact, I don't remember seeing anything realistic in the fight scenes with the Wood Elves.

The only blood was when Kili got hit with a "morgul arrow", which again...isn't part of the book.
 

jaha2000

Senior member
Jul 28, 2008
949
0
0
The deviation from the books is starting to drive me mad...
I keep watching it going, what???
 

SlushySolid

Member
Oct 10, 2013
80
0
0
okay, if my fiance Kim is a Hobbit, how come she don't live in a hole in the ground? BOOM! All y'all got lit up, cuh!
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,939
3,919
136
Time fillers like the "bear guy" and the spiders...You should read the books.

Seriously. Lol.

I saw this on Saturday. It was ok, it was cartooney, not sure how much I like it. I'll still watch the third because I like the books and stories by Tolkien.

One complaint was how outrageous the fight scenes were. Legolas and Tauriel are killing machines that don't break a sweat, and don't have a spec of Orc blood on them. In fact, I don't remember seeing anything realistic in the fight scenes with the Wood Elves.

The only blood was when Kili got hit with a "morgul arrow", which again...isn't part of the book.

I didn't mind that kind of stuff even in the LOTR. Elves were pretty much badass super warriors even in the books. Imagine how good you'd be if you had thousands of years to train?

I thought the scenes within the elven city were as well done as those in Lothlorien from FOTR. Thranduil was especially well portrayed. I also liked Tauriel much better as a character than Arwen from LOTR. Maybe because as a silvan elf she seems less aloof and dramatic than the high elf Arwen.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,803
20,407
146
Seriously. Lol.



I didn't mind that kind of stuff even in the LOTR. Elves were pretty much badass super warriors even in the books. Imagine how good you'd be if you had thousands of years to train?

Orcs don't bleed? Elves don't sweat? I know what you're saying, but the fight scene felt like the creators spent more time on how cool they make the elf cartoons move, instead of adding the aspect of realism that some may look for.