DooKey
Golden Member
- Nov 9, 2005
- 1,811
- 458
- 136
No, my initial comment was that, since two new consoles were launching this year, some people would choose them over upgrading if GPUs were prohibitively more expensive for them. Gamers want to play games. The platform they chose to play them on is a value proposition, especially at a time when they are announcing both a new GPU cycle and console generation. Just because you say "you are wrong" doesn't mean you had a point to address.
And the market only cares about gross numbers? What the pants do you think gross numbers are made of? Individual purchases. Like the ones we make. Like the ones we are discussing here. Please tell me what you are adding to the discussion besides a pitiful understanding of economics?
"if the new generation of GPUs is prohibitively expensive, more PC gamers will choose to go to the new console generation launching this year instead of upgrading/building new PCs and you will essentially be shooting your own market size/share right in the face"
What's this quoted comment mean? If you are talking about the mass market you are wrong. If you are talking about enthusiasts you are wrong. The mass market could care less about high end cards and the enthusiast market is too small to matter much in the big picture. MOST gamers play games on mid to low range GPUs.
Of course the market only cares about gross numbers. Until enough individual purchasers add up to make a dent in profits the market/corporation doesn't care. You have no clue about economics do you? Get it through your skull.........the video card market is all about OEM and mass market sales. Enthusiasts are just a side show. NV is killing AMD up and down the product range.
