- Jun 8, 2003
- 14,387
- 480
- 126
They mentioned the details on the page before: http://www.babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-vs-titan-xp-overclocking-showdown/3/They didn't bother to list any details? Clocks? Power, heat, noise etc? Considering all the tests are 1-2 fps different going back and forth between the two we can't even tell which games prefer memory clocks over core clocks and which are just margin of error.
They mentioned the details on the page before: http://www.babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-vs-titan-xp-overclocking-showdown/3/
They didn't really test the heat, and only mentioned the noise was similar. The 1080ti got 50mhz higher OC.
Sounds like normal variations or refinements of later parts.2.5% higher clocks on 1080 Ti. Silicon lottery?
5.7% more bandwidth on 1080 Ti. This is what I'm more curious about. If this is less lottery dependent and a more consistent advantage than core clocks are, then the average Ti should be faster.
Not that I expect any TXP owners to trade to Ti in the hopes of higher bandwidth after max OC.
2.5% higher clocks on 1080 Ti. Silicon lottery?
5.7% more bandwidth on 1080 Ti. This is what I'm more curious about. If this is less lottery dependent and a more consistent advantage than core clocks are, then the average Ti should be faster.
Sucks going from a 2,050mhz GTX 1080 to a 1988mhz GTX 1080 Ti.