• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The GTX 1080 Ti vs. The TITAN XP Overclocking Showdown

http://www.babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-vs-titan-xp-overclocking-showdown/4/

1080ti wins.

Main-Chart.jpg
 
They didn't bother to list any details? Clocks? Power, heat, noise etc? Considering all the tests are 1-2 fps different going back and forth between the two we can't even tell which games prefer memory clocks over core clocks and which are just margin of error.
 
They didn't bother to list any details? Clocks? Power, heat, noise etc? Considering all the tests are 1-2 fps different going back and forth between the two we can't even tell which games prefer memory clocks over core clocks and which are just margin of error.
They mentioned the details on the page before: http://www.babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-vs-titan-xp-overclocking-showdown/3/

They didn't really test the heat, and only mentioned the noise was similar. The 1080ti got 50mhz higher OC.
 
They mentioned the details on the page before: http://www.babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-vs-titan-xp-overclocking-showdown/3/

They didn't really test the heat, and only mentioned the noise was similar. The 1080ti got 50mhz higher OC.

Ah thanks, I didn't realize there was more pages since there was no "back"

Our final TITAN X overclock of an additional 160MHz to the core and 200MHz to the memory gave us a steady 1949MHz core and 5200MHz memory.

(1080 Ti) we reached a steady 1999MHz core and 6000MHz (12000MHz) memory clocks.
 
2.5% higher clocks on 1080 Ti. Silicon lottery?

5.7% more bandwidth on 1080 Ti. This is what I'm more curious about. If this is less lottery dependent and a more consistent advantage than core clocks are, then the average Ti should be faster.

Not that I expect any TXP owners to trade to Ti in the hopes of higher bandwidth after max OC.
 
2.5% higher clocks on 1080 Ti. Silicon lottery?

5.7% more bandwidth on 1080 Ti. This is what I'm more curious about. If this is less lottery dependent and a more consistent advantage than core clocks are, then the average Ti should be faster.

Not that I expect any TXP owners to trade to Ti in the hopes of higher bandwidth after max OC.
Sounds like normal variations or refinements of later parts.
 
2.5% higher clocks on 1080 Ti. Silicon lottery?

5.7% more bandwidth on 1080 Ti. This is what I'm more curious about. If this is less lottery dependent and a more consistent advantage than core clocks are, then the average Ti should be faster.

Yeah core seems same as old Titan X's

http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2568-titan-x-pascal-hybrid-results-clock-throttling-on-reference

They hit 1974 / +450 mem. The 1080 Ti will be faster if the game was previously bandwidth limited

Sucks going from a 2,050mhz GTX 1080 to a 1988mhz GTX 1080 Ti.

He got stuck @ 1988 on his WC'd 1080 Ti, so less than 1% faster than the Titan XP @ GN.
 
Back
Top