Originally posted by: OSX
This is only assuming you'll be 'upgrading' to Windows Vista. The Linux folks will be gladly sitting around watching digital content on their regular monitors.
Again the devices enforce it. HDCP requires: a "secure operating system", i.e Windows Vista or Apple OSX running on a Trusted Computing platform, it requires a "secure" graphics card, and a "secure" monitor. At no point will you, the user, have access to the unencrypted signal, the signal is encoded right up until it is displayed on the monitor. Oh and if you want to use Linux or another Free operating system, you're out of luck.
Apple will be on board too, possibly with the release of Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5). Tiger saw the light of day in April, and with the company intending to release Leopard around the same time as Vista, that means that we'll be seeing HDCP support on the Mac (powered by Intel!) probably around the same time as the release of Windows Vista. And until then, we'll all be scratching our heads as to how our Linux friends will solve this quandary, because HDCP has to be commercially licensed. Well, that is unless DVD Jon swoops in again, but cracking BDA's discs won't be as simple as cracking CSS.
Originally posted by: networkman
I read the article and thought "Yeah, so what else is new?"
While some of you may not plan on upgrading to Vista at the end of this year, this is eventually going to affect you if you ever planned on watching hi-def movies on your PC in the future.
I dare say good sized segment of the population does not plan to watch hi-def movies on their PCs. To this date, I can count on one hand the number of movies ala DVD that I've watched on my PC anyway; that's what TVs and couches are made for. I'm sure some folks have wired their PCs into their entertainment centers, I just don't happen to be one of them. Not because I can't, but because I don't want or need to.
As for this whole thing about Vista.. heck, I'm just now getting around to installing XP on my machines(both at home and at work). Windows 2000 Pro has worked just fine for everything I've need it to do - be it gaming or productivity, so I don't see not being able to run Vista(because of HDCP issues) to be any kind of a problem. And again, I dare say a fair segment of the population feels likewise.
Of course, if they DO go HDMI, it does open the door for nVidia to integrate a new version of Soundstorm into the GPU that outputs sound through the HMDI connector. The coolness of that possibility takes away some of the sting.
Originally posted by: networkman
I read the article and thought "Yeah, so what else is new?"
While some of you may not plan on upgrading to Vista at the end of this year, this is eventually going to affect you if you ever planned on watching hi-def movies on your PC in the future.
I dare say good sized segment of the population does not plan to watch hi-def movies on their PCs. To this date, I can count on one hand the number of movies ala DVD that I've watched on my PC anyway; that's what TVs and couches are made for. I'm sure some folks have wired their PCs into their entertainment centers, I just don't happen to be one of them. Not because I can't, but because I don't want or need to.
Originally posted by: kranky
Won't bother me. I have a brand new monitor and a brand new video card, and if I have to replace them just to watch certain movies, then I won't buy those movies. No way in the world I would shell out hundreds of dollars more just to be able to watch movies on a PC.
Originally posted by: Kyanzes
These protections will be obviously hacked/cracked before the official release.
Originally posted by: firewolfsm
i'm a little confused, does this mean we just can't watch high def movies or we can't install vista at all?
Originally posted by: gxsaurav
i don't care, vista latest build works fine on my FX5900XT, i will be upgrading to dual core anyway, after vista comes with a PCI-e gfx card
besides, i found that if i don't have HDCP complient Monitor & gfx card, HD-DVD & Blu-ray will still play at 720p, which is good enough for my 17" Monitor, which i don't intend to change anytime soon, even at full screen