• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The 'gayest' thing I've ever seen

Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: JDrake
Nah, gay is the right word
Click to expand...

It *is* a duet by a man and a woman. I don't know that I'd describe that as "gay". It's definitely not *good*, though.
Click to expand...

Just remember that gay has been redefined, BBC
Click to expand...

Cool link. I think that's been common knowledge for a long time now, but homosexuals think everyone is out to get them, so when I call something gay, I am just being homophobic.

Nowadays the bad connotation for a homosexual person has become "i love you." Note, I am just describing what I believe is the modern "bad word" for a homosexual, not calling anyone it.

I think the word gay should be allowed to be used without penalties since it's meaning has definitely changed. Just like the human species, the languages we use evolve.
 
Originally posted by: PowerMacG5
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: JDrake
Nah, gay is the right word
Click to expand...

It *is* a duet by a man and a woman. I don't know that I'd describe that as "gay". It's definitely not *good*, though.
Click to expand...

Just remember that gay has been redefined, BBC
Click to expand...

Cool link. I think that's been common knowledge for a long time now, but homosexuals think everyone is out to get them, so when I call something gay, I am just being homophobic.

Nowadays the bad connotation for a homosexual person has become "i love you." Note, I am just describing what I believe is the modern "bad word" for a homosexual, not calling anyone it.

I think the word gay should be allowed to be used without penalties since it's meaning has definitely changed. Just like the human species, the languages we use evolve.
Click to expand...


It's just ridiculous. They want to be a lovely human and want rights and crap, but you can't call them a lovely human or a gay or they get all upset. Hell some of them get upset if you call them homos.
 
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: JDrake
Nah, gay is the right word
Click to expand...

It *is* a duet by a man and a woman. I don't know that I'd describe that as "gay". It's definitely not *good*, though.
Click to expand...

Just remember that gay has been redefined, BBC
Click to expand...

Anyone that uses it in that sort of context is still considered very immature however.
 
"Gay" used to be a bannable offense, but it's obvious you mean "happy" and not the sexual preference meaning of the word. They certainly are the "happiest" people I've ever seen.
 
Originally posted by: OdiN
It's just ridiculous. They want to be a lovely human and want rights and crap, but you can't call them a lovely human or a gay or they get all upset. Hell some of them get upset if you call them homos.
Click to expand...

What is ridiculous about that? How is it any different from *any* other persecuted group in history that didn't want to be called offensive names?

"You can't call them a ****** or they get all upset."
"You can't call them a beloved patriot or they get all upset."

No ******, they get upset. :roll:

Also, "them" is plural.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top