The Future of PC Gaming

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
Its either a lame advertisement for a video card, or else they're talking about something else entirely. The way they hype it up with "first the CPU, then the GPU, now the..." PPU? Physics processor from AGEIA?

My guess is that its another lame advertisement for another video card. The industry already tried to regain the hype nVidia generated when they started touting the GPU with the GeForce 1 by trying to coin another term, the "VPU" which obviously failed, as a VPU is a GPU. I'm guessing its a lame advertisement for a new video card because getting a PPU now would do us what good? Are there any games that are out now that could take advantage of it, or games to be out by spring?

Although the PPU is the next logical step, and would fit their train of thought: first the CPU -> then the GPU -> now the PPU, however I wouldn't put it past them to try and tout a new GPU or video card (possibly with mulitple GPUs) as the next thing to change gaming even though we get that with every refresh.
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,170
13
81
Looks like a PPU.

In the dawn of PC gaming, there was only the CPU; a brain calculating the best it could with no way to display or move gaming content in realistic ways.

Then came the GPU, taking the graphics load off of the CPU, resulting in astonishing graphical images to dazzle the eyes and bring some realism to the imagery of games.

The next evolution of realism and action in PC gaming is just around the corner. Soon, BFG will bring enthusiasts around the world the next exciting level of gaming. Don't be left behind...


The future of PC gaming from BFG Technologies. Arrives Spring 2006.


And both BFG and ASUS are signed up to produce AEGIA PPU cards.

http://www.simhq.com/_technology/technology_067a.html
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
If it's a PPU, then it's nothing big. The idea of a seperate component for physics died the day the X2/Pentium D launched.
 

the Chase

Golden Member
Sep 22, 2005
1,403
0
0
Originally posted by: Extelleron
If it's a PPU, then it's nothing big. The idea of a seperate component for physics died the day the X2/Pentium D launched.

Did they change how well their CPU's are able to process physics instructions?
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
Originally posted by: the Chase
Originally posted by: Extelleron
If it's a PPU, then it's nothing big. The idea of a seperate component for physics died the day the X2/Pentium D launched.

Did they change how well their CPU's are able to process physics instructions?

Not yet, but its not like either way of boosting physics exactly has any support at this point in time.

However, the PPU depends on people actually owning/buying it, and so they need it to be in machines before they can really get much support for it, but at the same time people don't want it because there isn't support for it. With the dual-core CPUs, there are plenty of them out already, and more and more computers will have them in the future, so its hardware that is more available.

Granted, based on the praises that Ageia spread about the PPU, then even another regular CPU core wouldn't be able to boost physics like it can, but it seems like a much better solution.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: Extelleron
If it's a PPU, then it's nothing big. The idea of a seperate component for physics died the day the X2/Pentium D launched.

They adopted another instruction set for the second core? Wow, I must not have been aware of that.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
I can see where this is heading, and I don't want to get into another thread of discussing the merits and demerits of the PPU as seen from the eyes of a technophobe. PC hardware has to be the only "enthusiast" topic where those involved actually shun the new technology, which is ironic considering it is all about technology. The PhysX card is going to be expensive at first, all new tech is... Deal with that fact, and deal with the fact that technology advances... PC gaming and high end PC components are expensive, that's why they make Xboxes and eMachines...
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: Rage187
PPU's are going to be a huge failure.

Same thing people said about 3D accelerators. If OEMs start implementing them, they'll already have a huge sales base.
 

Rage187

Lifer
Dec 30, 2000
14,276
4
81
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: Rage187
PPU's are going to be a huge failure.

Same thing people said about 3D accelerators. If OEMs start implementing them, they'll already have a huge sales base.

IF being the operative word.


OEMs are always trying to cut cost, and adding more cost in the form of a uneeded PPU doesn't sound like a sound business plan.
 

Bobthelost

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,360
0
0
Originally posted by: Rage187
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: Rage187
PPU's are going to be a huge failure.

Same thing people said about 3D accelerators. If OEMs start implementing them, they'll already have a huge sales base.

IF being the operative word.


OEMs are always trying to cut cost, and adding more cost in the form of a uneeded PPU doesn't sound like a sound business plan.

Your lack of faith in the power of marketing is disapointing. All you have to do is include one in all the high end Dell gaming computers, (which could use them to take some of the load off the P4s ;)) and start marketing them as a good upgrade path and voila!
 

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
5,660
762
126
I'm not sure how these physics cards would work in practice. Unlike video cards, they would alter gameplay directly, which would create problems in multiplayer games. It seems that if the card is supported at all in a game, it would have to be required for everyone, which would kill the game's sales.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Don't worry, people like my next door neighbors will keep them going. I think they bought the highest end Dell PC and they haven't opened it up yet. All they intended to do was do some word processing (they are not gamers period).

Originally posted by: Bobthelost
Your lack of faith in the power of marketing is disapointing. All you have to do is include one in all the high end Dell gaming computers, (which could use them to take some of the load off the P4s ;)) and start marketing them as a good upgrade path and voila!

Exactly. They may not trick frequent AnandTechers, but they will trick average people into buying them and get a market off it.

Originally posted by: CP5670
I'm not sure how these physics cards would work in practice. Unlike video cards, they would alter gameplay directly, which would create problems in multiplayer games. It seems that if the card is supported at all in a game, it would have to be required for everyone, which would kill the game's sales.

They will probably have 'boundary boxes' for all possible values of calculated precision. I don't know, it hurts the brain to even think about what they'd do about it.
 

VERTIGGO

Senior member
Apr 29, 2005
826
0
76
negative. have you tried to watch the 3DMARK06 CPU tests? It's a gruelling experience. The benefeits of dedicated hardware while not end all/be all, are enormous.
 

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,786
789
136
I'll be getting one around the time UT2007 comes out. I'll probably upgrade my Motherboard at that point aswell, for AM2, DDR2 & SLI or Crossfire X16.

Doesn't bother me too much if it performs miracles or bombs spectacularly, they'll always find other uses for it like in those Folding, SETI etc programs.
 

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
Without a PPU your PCs won't be handling ports from the consoles without being scaled down. Consoles are becoming the lead dev platform for almost all of the "PC" developers as of this point. It is simply a matter of time until it is a standard component and it will remain so for many years at least(by the time CPUs can touch what the first gen PPUs will handle they will be on their third, fourth or fifth gen PPU).
 

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
5,660
762
126
They will probably have 'boundary boxes' for all possible values of calculated precision. I don't know, it hurts the brain to even think about what they'd do about it.

It would be pointless to buy the card in that case though, if it just reverts to the "simple" physics. That's what I can't understand about this; the card would either need to have almost no effect or make the game work differently for each player. I can only see it being used in singleplayer games for a while.
 

v8envy

Platinum Member
Sep 7, 2002
2,720
0
0
A PPU could be used for effects like dynamic (flapping) cloth and other eye candy without being tied to computing bullet ballistics and other gameplay elements.

So it might even be useful for MP games.

Meh. It's a chicken and egg scenario, and I'm not going to blow $200 on one of these bad boys until it's as much of a gaming experience upgrade as a $200 vs integrated graphics card.

$700 in hardware to play $50 games. Um. Yeah. Time to learn to like the console controller.
 

stnicralisk

Golden Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,705
1
0
It is likely I will wait till the second generation, the leap from first to second is usually fairly significant as well as the technologies exposure and implementation.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Originally posted by: Rage187
PPU's are going to be a huge failure.

Common sense tells us that at $250+ they will be since you can buy a whole graphics card that will boost performance much more for $250. Yet look at all those 7800GTX SLI rigs....