The fleecings of America

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cmv

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
3,490
0
76
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: cmv
Am I the only one that used to like John S. but now thinks he is a jack ass that went "Geraldo Rivera"? I avoid ad hominem attacks but he gets under my skin.

Hes always been the same ole cycnical/pessmistic libertarian atleast the past ~8 years Ive watched his reports.

I suppose... I'm reading this article and most of the points I agree with and think are interesting. Although, if you live in a city next to a club you're going to get some noise -- why did you move there? I grew up in a house in Chicago with bars on both ends of the block. We usually got noise at night on the weekends and we dealt with it. Of course, those noisy people were also inconsiderate bastards that made noise in a neighborhood they didn't live in so...
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: Ornery
Translation: He's mean to us Democrat/Socialist/greenies. :(

Hes not that nice to republicans either. Hes gone on for years about govt spending by both republicans and democrats.

 

cmv

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
3,490
0
76
Originally posted by: Ornery
Translation: He's mean to us Democrat/Socialist/greenies. :(

Maybe what he meant but definately not what I meant. Geraldo Rivera is a sensationalist. John S. has become much more of a sensationalist than when he first started working on prime time news reporting shows. I enjoy the content of his reporting but not his hysteric style so I no longer watch him.
 

dderidex

Platinum Member
Mar 13, 2001
2,732
0
0
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.

I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.

Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.

It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm

No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.

Why not?

Country is filled with stupid people, and you can't just LET THEM BE. The government, unfortunately, DOES need to step in.

Problem with letting stupid people be stupid is that they still reproduce. If you failed at reproducing by being stupid, I'd have no problem with the government staying out of everyone's business. Stupidness would be bred out of the gene pool ASAP, and we'd have no problems.
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.

Outsourcing sounds like a cool idea until it's YOUR turn to have your job outsourced overseas. Trust me, your Microeconomics class isn't going to help you much when you're forced to work at Walmart because your cushy accounting or IT job is now being done by two guys in India for half the price :)
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.

I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.

Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.

It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm

No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.

Why not?

Country is filled with stupid people, and you can't just LET THEM BE. The government, unfortunately, DOES need to step in.

Problem with letting stupid people be stupid is that they still reproduce. If you failed at reproducing by being stupid, I'd have no problem with the government staying out of everyone's business. Stupidness would be bred out of the gene pool ASAP, and we'd have no problems.

What are you a communist? Seriously. You certainly cant be a conservative or liberal. Unless my sarcasm meter is broken.
 

Jassi

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2004
3,296
0
0
OP- Thanks for a great article. Bookmarked to pass onto the people that whine about this stuff :)
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.

Outsourcing sounds like a cool idea until it's YOUR turn to have your job outsourced overseas. Trust me, your Microeconomics class isn't going to help you much when you're forced to work at Walmart because your cushy accounting or IT job is now being done by two guys in India for half the price :)

That was one of my issues with his report. He never said how many people had to take lower paying or less desireable jobs after they lose their current ones to outsourcing.

Plus he never made any points about what impact it has to consumers concerning quality of product or quality of service. Dell has been seriously burned in that regard. They have been put to the flames for their overseas tech support and it's abysmal receivings from it's customers.
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
MYTH No. 1 Sharing Would Make the World a Better Place...

He never said how many people had to take lower paying or less desireable jobs after they lose their current ones to outsourcing.

Plus he never made any points about what impact it has to consumers concerning quality of product or quality of service.
Like anybody knows!

The point is, these things shake out on their own without government interference. People get jobs that can't be outsourced, consumers reap lower prices of goods made by outsourced labor, and Dell hires back some displaced workers. All without the government lifting a finger! Imagine that... :Q
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,419
13,039
136
Originally posted by: vi_edit

My biggests problem is with his final point about "private ownership". Here's my hitch with it. WE ALL own the earth. Sure you as an individual may have a peice of paper that says "I own this chunk of land", but none of us stake claim to oceans, rivers, the sky, the underground aquifers, ect. What you do on your land DOES affect other peoples land and the land that we all own. I'm not trying to be a tree hugger here, but people just can't seem to grasp this concept. If you don't like having crap laying around your own place, be considerate and don't leave it laying around other peoples. It's the simple golden rule. If you wouldn't want it done at your place, don't do it at/on someone elses.

One of the teachers at my school told me about the Peruvian(?) economic revolution: poor peasants were allowed to own their own portions of land. Once in possession of the land, they were able to actually do something with it in order to make it more valuable = economic boom. I think it was in the 80's maybe? i don't recall exactly what he said, so don't quote me on every little bit.
step 1
privitization....
2....
3. Profit! :p
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Like anybody knows!

The point is, these things shake out on their own without government interference. People get jobs that can't be outsourced, consumers reap lower prices of goods made by outsourced labor, and Dell hires back some displaced workers. All without the government lifting a finger! Imagine that...

And I've never said in ANY outsourcing related thread or post that the government should step in and do something to stop it.

What I have said is that it's a temporary fix that verywell could(and has) come back to haunt both consumers and business owners.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: Zebo
Liberals huh? My Bush supporting neighbor is a tree hugger extrodinarie. He called the cops cause I sometimes burn my own trash. I love riding my two stroke by his house and plumming blue smoke or starting my boat which is two stroke too, I started using motoroil instead a while back in all my two stroke implements/toys a) it's cheaper b) it makes lots more blue smoke than regular 2-cycle oil just to piss him off.

He'll prolly be joining this party after I'm done with him. "Libertarian National Socialist Green Party" LMAO talk about contridictions.
http://www.nazi.org/library/faq/
Idiots like you make me laugh, because you think you're pissing other people off, but in reality, you're just reducing the life of your equipment, and that makes me smile.

Keep using engine oil in your two-cycle engines. Just don't expect any help from me when you post a "My chainsaw/motorcycle/boat won't start" thread.

:p

The equipment abuse pisses me off more than the pollution, and I'm a "treehugger". Enjoy your 2-cycle paperweights.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.
 

amoeba

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2003
3,162
1
0
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Like anybody knows!

The point is, these things shake out on their own without government interference. People get jobs that can't be outsourced, consumers reap lower prices of goods made by outsourced labor, and Dell hires back some displaced workers. All without the government lifting a finger! Imagine that...

And I've never said in ANY outsourcing related thread or post that the government should step in and do something to stop it.

What I have said is that it's a temporary fix that verywell could(and has) come back to haunt both consumers and business owners.



It is a nessecity of global capitolism. Hint Hint, the US is overpaid for its work.

The amazing thing is that the ones who fervently oppose outsourcing are usually also the ones who fervently oppose socialism.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: amoeba


The amazing thing is that the ones who fervently oppose outsourcing are usually also the ones who fervently oppose socialism.

Not true at all. The most vocal critics of outsourcing are the Democrats and the Unions that support them.

The most vocal supporters of free trade are libertarians and libertarian minded republicans (not protectionist fools like Patrick Buchanan).
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.

The rockies make up 70% of the land?

Much, if not most of the undeveloped land could be converted to farm land if needed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.
The rockies make up 70% of the land?

Much, if not most of the undeveloped land could be converted to farm land if needed.
No, it can't, Amused. Not every flat field can be instantly converted into farmland. The study of farmland soils is literally a science unto itself.
And that 90-95% of the US is undeveloped is very misleading. Much of the "undeveloped" land actually is already developed... as farmland, as forest land for future timber harvest, etc.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
His urban sprawl section is simply wrong. He says poeple shouldn't force their lifestyle on others, but that is exactly what he and others do. Every single fscking city in north america is organized in the same horrible way - the endless identical subdivisions, the ugly, characterless big box stores and chain resturants with fscking patios on the parking lot. Me and others like me, what are we supposed to do? According to him, talking to city council is a no-no, voicing your opinion is a no-no, trying to change anything is a definate no-no. One might have thought that that is the whole point of local city councils and democracy, but apperantly, its not.

So where does that leave me and others like me? Emigrate. Great choice :roll:
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.

Outsourcing sounds like a cool idea until it's YOUR turn to have your job outsourced overseas. Trust me, your Microeconomics class isn't going to help you much when you're forced to work at Walmart because your cushy accounting or IT job is now being done by two guys in India for half the price :)

That was one of my issues with his report. He never said how many people had to take lower paying or less desireable jobs after they lose their current ones to outsourcing.

Plus he never made any points about what impact it has to consumers concerning quality of product or quality of service. Dell has been seriously burned in that regard. They have been put to the flames for their overseas tech support and it's abysmal receivings from it's customers.
1) You will be forced to adapt, and most will eventually attain the standard of living you had before. 2) This adaptation will better society, because your new career will benefit society more because there is a need for it.

Not so hard to see, is it? Yeah I know, times will be tough while you work at WalMart and go to night school. The fact of the matter is, if you were outsourced to people who can barely speak English and you can't find a new job soon thereafter, your job probably didn't benefit society that much. So suck it up.

 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).

You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.

Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.

You're absolutely right. My only point was that the article ignores the short term economic consequences (and consequently the political dangers) of outsourcing. Again, Stossel has a tendency to oversimplify issues.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.

I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.

Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.

It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm

No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.

Why not?

Country is filled with stupid people, and you can't just LET THEM BE. The government, unfortunately, DOES need to step in.

Problem with letting stupid people be stupid is that they still reproduce. If you failed at reproducing by being stupid, I'd have no problem with the government staying out of everyone's business. Stupidness would be bred out of the gene pool ASAP, and we'd have no problems.

Being that television, according to your post above, is something stupid people watch, I guess that would leave you out of the gene pool too? I mean you post frequently in ATOT forums about television shows...
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).

You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.

Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.

You're absolutely right. My only point was that the article ignores the short term economic consequences (and consequently the political dangers) of outsourcing. Again, Stossel has a tendency to oversimplify issues.

Or he looks at the big picture, rather than focusing only on short term problems.

See how that goes?
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).

You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.

Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.

You're absolutely right. My only point was that the article ignores the short term economic consequences (and consequently the political dangers) of outsourcing. Again, Stossel has a tendency to oversimplify issues.
I think he did touch on that. He mentioned how hard it was for the couple laid off from the Levi's plant. It doesn't take a genious to figure out that people are going to have to tap into savings until they find a new job, and that consumer spending on a regional level will be down.