Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: cmv
Am I the only one that used to like John S. but now thinks he is a jack ass that went "Geraldo Rivera"? I avoid ad hominem attacks but he gets under my skin.
Hes always been the same ole cycnical/pessmistic libertarian atleast the past ~8 years Ive watched his reports.
Originally posted by: Ornery
Translation: He's mean to us Democrat/Socialist/greenies.![]()
Originally posted by: Ornery
Translation: He's mean to us Democrat/Socialist/greenies.![]()
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.
I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.
Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.
It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm
No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.
I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.
Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.
It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm
No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.
Why not?
Country is filled with stupid people, and you can't just LET THEM BE. The government, unfortunately, DOES need to step in.
Problem with letting stupid people be stupid is that they still reproduce. If you failed at reproducing by being stupid, I'd have no problem with the government staying out of everyone's business. Stupidness would be bred out of the gene pool ASAP, and we'd have no problems.
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.
Outsourcing sounds like a cool idea until it's YOUR turn to have your job outsourced overseas. Trust me, your Microeconomics class isn't going to help you much when you're forced to work at Walmart because your cushy accounting or IT job is now being done by two guys in India for half the price![]()
Like anybody knows!He never said how many people had to take lower paying or less desireable jobs after they lose their current ones to outsourcing.
Plus he never made any points about what impact it has to consumers concerning quality of product or quality of service.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
My biggests problem is with his final point about "private ownership". Here's my hitch with it. WE ALL own the earth. Sure you as an individual may have a peice of paper that says "I own this chunk of land", but none of us stake claim to oceans, rivers, the sky, the underground aquifers, ect. What you do on your land DOES affect other peoples land and the land that we all own. I'm not trying to be a tree hugger here, but people just can't seem to grasp this concept. If you don't like having crap laying around your own place, be considerate and don't leave it laying around other peoples. It's the simple golden rule. If you wouldn't want it done at your place, don't do it at/on someone elses.
Like anybody knows!
The point is, these things shake out on their own without government interference. People get jobs that can't be outsourced, consumers reap lower prices of goods made by outsourced labor, and Dell hires back some displaced workers. All without the government lifting a finger! Imagine that...
Idiots like you make me laugh, because you think you're pissing other people off, but in reality, you're just reducing the life of your equipment, and that makes me smile.Originally posted by: Zebo
Liberals huh? My Bush supporting neighbor is a tree hugger extrodinarie. He called the cops cause I sometimes burn my own trash. I love riding my two stroke by his house and plumming blue smoke or starting my boat which is two stroke too, I started using motoroil instead a while back in all my two stroke implements/toys a) it's cheaper b) it makes lots more blue smoke than regular 2-cycle oil just to piss him off.
He'll prolly be joining this party after I'm done with him. "Libertarian National Socialist Green Party" LMAO talk about contridictions.
http://www.nazi.org/library/faq/
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Like anybody knows!
The point is, these things shake out on their own without government interference. People get jobs that can't be outsourced, consumers reap lower prices of goods made by outsourced labor, and Dell hires back some displaced workers. All without the government lifting a finger! Imagine that...
And I've never said in ANY outsourcing related thread or post that the government should step in and do something to stop it.
What I have said is that it's a temporary fix that verywell could(and has) come back to haunt both consumers and business owners.
Originally posted by: amoeba
The amazing thing is that the ones who fervently oppose outsourcing are usually also the ones who fervently oppose socialism.
Originally posted by: Vic
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
No, it can't, Amused. Not every flat field can be instantly converted into farmland. The study of farmland soils is literally a science unto itself.Originally posted by: Amused
The rockies make up 70% of the land?Originally posted by: Vic
And less than 10% of that undeveloped land is farmland. You can't farm the Rockies.Originally posted by: digitalsm
Funny. 90% of so of the US is undeveloped.
Much, if not most of the undeveloped land could be converted to farm land if needed.
1) You will be forced to adapt, and most will eventually attain the standard of living you had before. 2) This adaptation will better society, because your new career will benefit society more because there is a need for it.Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you think outsourcing is bad, read this article. Like I've sayin for years, outsourcing only improves our economy. Anyone who took Micro should know this.
Outsourcing sounds like a cool idea until it's YOUR turn to have your job outsourced overseas. Trust me, your Microeconomics class isn't going to help you much when you're forced to work at Walmart because your cushy accounting or IT job is now being done by two guys in India for half the price![]()
That was one of my issues with his report. He never said how many people had to take lower paying or less desireable jobs after they lose their current ones to outsourcing.
Plus he never made any points about what impact it has to consumers concerning quality of product or quality of service. Dell has been seriously burned in that regard. They have been put to the flames for their overseas tech support and it's abysmal receivings from it's customers.
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).
You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.
Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.
Originally posted by: dderidex
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: torpid
The anti-sprawl arguments above are hilarious. Really, thanks for a good laugh.
I never thought someone would be so preposterous as to offer eliminating urban sprawl as a way of making people lose weight.
Are you denying a correlation?
Live in New York City. Judge how much walking you do.
Live in Houston. Sit in a car for 2 hours each way of commutes. Drive everywhere you go, because everything is so far spread out.
It's unbelievable you're denying a correlation.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...8-28-sprawl-usat_x.htm
No Mr. Straw Man. I am denying your proposed solution. There is also a correlation between sitting on the couch all day and being overweight. I'm not going to propose that cities disallow televisions and couches to solve the problem.
Why not?
Country is filled with stupid people, and you can't just LET THEM BE. The government, unfortunately, DOES need to step in.
Problem with letting stupid people be stupid is that they still reproduce. If you failed at reproducing by being stupid, I'd have no problem with the government staying out of everyone's business. Stupidness would be bred out of the gene pool ASAP, and we'd have no problems.
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).
You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.
Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.
You're absolutely right. My only point was that the article ignores the short term economic consequences (and consequently the political dangers) of outsourcing. Again, Stossel has a tendency to oversimplify issues.
I think he did touch on that. He mentioned how hard it was for the couple laid off from the Levi's plant. It doesn't take a genious to figure out that people are going to have to tap into savings until they find a new job, and that consumer spending on a regional level will be down.Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Hardcore
In the long term, yes, efficient allocation of resources is a GOOD thing for the global economy. However, the short term effects of outsourcing definitely have a negative impact. If I'm a skilled worker and my skill is outsourced overseas, where am I going to go for a job? I have to acquire new skills, but new skills require time and money. In the meantime, I don't have a job and I probably have to rely on government funds to help me get by. Expand this over multiple industries and you have a serious economic problem (again, at least in the short term).
You can say that for anything then... why use assembly lines, because that makes labor cheap, and makes specialists useless. Who needs to spend $1k on a table to have a carpenter make it from scratch, when you can make the same table using an assembly line for only $100.
Lets not replace manual labor with robotics on those assembly lines, because that'll put people out of employment.
You're absolutely right. My only point was that the article ignores the short term economic consequences (and consequently the political dangers) of outsourcing. Again, Stossel has a tendency to oversimplify issues.
