The "Fairness Doctrine" Drumbeat Heating Up!

[Doc Savage Fan]

Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan

Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan

Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan

Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Repost x ?

The topic of the fairness doctrine has been beaten to death here. There has been an increasing drumbeat of support for reinstating it, but I'm not sure if that is anything more than rumor at this point, manufactured or not. Hell, there was an article recently about former president Clinton saying it should be reinstated. Stories about person X,Y,or Z supporting the FD seem to come out every few weeks. Until Congress holds hearings on the issue or the FCC mentions it, it is largely a moot issue, more suited to scare tactics by the right.

Maybe if the left wouldn't keep bringing it up then the right wouldn't react to it and invoke their 'scare tactics' (lol)....just a thought.

The right seems to be bringing this up systematically while those on the left have not. They have power to do so right now, but they do not. There will always be some that support the FD, but that has a snowball's chance in hell of even being brought up for official debate. This is really a right wing attempt to circle the wagons through the usual FUD. Like I said, when it is announced that it will be brought up in Congress, then it will be an issue. Until then, nothing to see here...

And the left is not bringing this up systematically? Dude...did you read the article? Hinchey's the one who brought up the subject and voiced his intentions to make the Fairness Doctrine part of a bill later this year and...God forbid... the right had the odasity to react? What are you saying...they should just STFU until it's actually brought up in Congress? Yet it's OK for Hinchey to freely express his opinion and any reaction to his intentions "is really a right wing attempt to circle the wagons through the usual FUD". Hitting the bottle a little early today?

Systematically? No, as anytime the FD has been brought up by those on the left it has been individuals expressing support for it, but not actually advocating for someone to go ahead and reinstate it. It is way more of an issue for Rush et. al. than it is for the lefties. The right has been hammering on the FD for quite some time before this, even before this congressional session. They have cried 'wolf' one too many times for me to really take such claims seriously, even as a supporter of the FD. It has a snowball's chance in hell of making it beyond a mere motion in either house right now.

So the crux of your rebuttal revolves around what a subjective term means to you ("systematically"), a simplistic stereotype that reflects a simplistic world view, and a perception that any reaction to FD is all the usual right wing FUD regardless of Hinchey's stated actual intentions. Your logic defies me.

No. There are many legitimate reactions to the FD, as are arguments against the concept of the FD. However, I dismiss this particular story as something new as a patturn has emerged over quite some time with right wing idealogues crying wolf when they know damn well it isn't going to be brought back. It is dead. Kaput. The only purpose it has served is to rally Rush's listeners. Every other week it seems there is yet another blog touching off yet another FD debate that we have already had ad nauseum. Until something happens beyond what we have already seen, it won't hold any water with me.

Hinchey apparently didn't get the memo dude. :roll:

 

[fskimospy]

Hey look its the weekly fairness doctrine thread! Call me when Obama supports it, or when a bill containing it passes either house of Congress. I'll be waiting.

Better yet, I'll finish off the thread for you guys:

Q: LIBRULZ WANT THE FAIRNESS DOCTREIN, FREE SPEECH UNLESS THEY DISAGREE WITH IT AMIRITE?

A: Just because a few people support it doesn't mean it's going to pass, and Obama doesn't support it.

Q: How do you know he doesn't support it? He said he was going to take public money in the campaign and then he didn't.

A: /facepalm

 

[brandonbull]

Originally posted by: MotF Bane

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, have you heard of the First Amendment? Why do you hate the Constitution?

Because he is one of those traitors that likes to give themselves labels such as "Liberals","Democrats","The Left","The Right","Conservatives","Republicans",etc instead of Americans. They love to label themselves as a group/party and then proceed to destroy American values all in the name of their stupid group/party.

If lefty-traitors don't won't the righty-traitors to dominate the radio stations, then stop being a bunch of slick-haired, used carsalesmen, elites and put someone that is entertaining.

 

[Rustler]

I am so glad the government will regulate everything to protect us from ourselves........................

 

[Rustler]

I am so glad the government will regulate everything to protect us from ourselves........................all hail Der Furher

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: brandonbull

Originally posted by: MotF Bane

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, have you heard of the First Amendment? Why do you hate the Constitution?

Because he is one of those traitors that likes to give themselves labels such as "Liberals","Democrats","The Left","The Right","Conservatives","Republicans",etc instead of Americans. They love to label themselves as a group/party and then proceed to destroy American values all in the name of their stupid group/party.

If lefty-traitors don't won't the righty-traitors to dominate the radio stations, then stop being a bunch of slick-haired, used carsalesmen, elites and put someone that is entertaining.

No, hate radio does not appeal to the left. We are people of greater understanding. Hate radio is for psychopaths full of anger and spite, little failure people clinging to the guns and Bibles, who are full of vindictiveness and venom. The left doesn't need to go down that path because they are progressive and up with the times. Hate radio is for those stuck in the past. All that is needed is for there to be opposing views aired alongside their shit and the stink of this sickness will reveal itself even to the morons that now listen. Light is the answer to darkness. Darkness is the absence of light.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

:laugh:

Same old tired lib BS. THEIR side brings it up and they claim it's FUD coming from the "right wing". Hello? YOUR PEOPLE keep talking about it. Hell, my worthless senator told some butthurt lib radio guy the other day that we need to work on it - "it" being the FD. So as much as you libs want to try to claim it's a non-issue - YOUR people keep bringing it up and supporting it.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: brandonbull

Originally posted by: MotF Bane

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, have you heard of the First Amendment? Why do you hate the Constitution?

Because he is one of those traitors that likes to give themselves labels such as "Liberals","Democrats","The Left","The Right","Conservatives","Republicans",etc instead of Americans. They love to label themselves as a group/party and then proceed to destroy American values all in the name of their stupid group/party.

If lefty-traitors don't won't the righty-traitors to dominate the radio stations, then stop being a bunch of slick-haired, used carsalesmen, elites and put someone that is entertaining.

No, hate radio does not appeal to the left. We are people of greater understanding. Hate radio is for psychopaths full of anger and spite, little failure people clinging to the guns and Bibles, who are full of vindictiveness and venom. The left doesn't need to go down that path because they are progressive and up with the times. Hate radio is for those stuck in the past. All that is needed is for there to be opposing views aired alongside their shit and the stink of this sickness will reveal itself even to the morons that now listen. Light is the answer to darkness. Darkness is the absence of light.

Psychopaths on both sides of the fence...you just happen to live in an interesting world where only one side of the fence is visible.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: AndrewR
People don't want liberal radio in the format the right uses.

Fixed

 

[JSt0rm]

Well I love npr and am a total junkie. I don't think its liberal per se but some of the non news shows might come off as liberal because of gay issues or whatever. But for enlightened people this is the best radio gets. Why would those people go to some liberal am radio? I don''t like being spoon fed my cheerleader lines like the neocons do. We have different mind sets on how information should be disseminated. I want to listen to something that makes me think not tells me how to think.

 

[dphantom]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:laugh:

Same old tired lib BS. THEIR side brings it up and they claim it's FUD coming from the "right wing". Hello? YOUR PEOPLE keep talking about it. Hell, my worthless senator told some butthurt lib radio guy the other day that we need to work on it - "it" being the FD. So as much as you libs want to try to claim it's a non-issue - YOUR people keep bringing it up and supporting it.

QFT.

My Senator also brought it up publicly. So did Harkin and others. So now is the time to shut down this censorship move, not when it becomes a bill in Congress. Then it is too late ala the so-called stimulus bill.

 

[dphantom]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: MotF Bane

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, have you heard of the First Amendment? Why do you hate the Constitution?

The first amendment was interpreted by the Supreme court to mean that money is speech. Who the hell elected them to make that determination. That ruling is killing our nation. The Germans don't allow free speech when it comes to Nazism. 50 million dead convinced them that it's not always a good idea. I am all for speech that can be opposed by other speech. I am opposed to speech that has no counter voice. You are an absolutist who thinks that anything can be said. I say that a functioning intelligence can discriminate between hate speech, fire in the theater speech, and reasonable speech. I don't believe being a nut case to the point your country is destroyed to be a good idea. Shut that fat fuck, Limpbrow, up with speech from others to counter his. In a marketplace of ideas, he has none.

Then what is stopping you from being that counter voice? No, the crux of your argument is because people are free to choose what they listen to and you disagree with that viewpoint, you want the government to censor the speech you disagree with and that people do not want to listen to.

Start up a talk radio show espousing your viewpoints. In 20 years, you too could have 20 million listeners and be successful like Rush. I just wish we had more articulate conservatives like Rush both on the air and in Congress. Maybe we would not be in the mess we are in today if that were so.

 

[PokerGuy]

Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
Well I love npr and am a total junkie. I don't think its liberal per se but some of the non news shows might come off as liberal because of gay issues or whatever. But for enlightened people this is the best radio gets. Why would those people go to some liberal am radio? I don''t like being spoon fed my cheerleader lines like the neocons do. We have different mind sets on how information should be disseminated. I want to listen to something that makes me think not tells me how to think.

Riiiiiiiight. The reality (though you can't see it), is that they do the exact same thing, except you happen to agree with their liberal viewpoints. Nothing wrong with that, I think you should be able to hear whatever viewpoint you want.

Basically the liberals don't want people to choose what to listen to if they don't agree with the choice of the people. It's elitism in action: "clearly, you are not smart enough to make the right choice on what to listen to, so we the smart government will need to make that decision for you".

 

[JSt0rm]

Originally posted by: PokerGuy
Riiiiiiiight. The reality (though you can't see it), is that they do the exact same thing, except you happen to agree with their liberal viewpoints. Nothing wrong with that, I think you should be able to hear whatever viewpoint you want.

Basically the liberals don't want people to choose what to listen to if they don't agree with the choice of the people. It's elitism in action: "clearly, you are not smart enough to make the right choice on what to listen to, so we the smart government will need to make that decision for you".

Actually on of my favorite shows on npr is Left, Right and Center. They have a panel of people discussing politics and its 1 left 1 right and 1 center talking. i don't care what you listen too. I'm just saying npr isn't liberal biased because they dont have some guy saying the same shit that limbo does. During the election they were very careful to give equal reporting time to McCain and Obama. I'm sorry you feel that way. i really do, because npr is a really neat asset we have as Americans.

 

[Lemon law]

Their is a problem with the dphantom argument of "Start up a talk radio show espousing your viewpoints. In 20 years, you too could have 20 million listeners and be successful like Rush. I just wish we had more articulate conservatives like Rush both on the air and in Congress. Maybe we would not be in the mess we are in today if that were so."

And that problem is that the very ideas advocated by Limbaugh and his right wing ilk are precisely why we are in the terrible situation we are now.

Without the fairness doctrine, Rush is allowed to spew his wacko ideologies with no debate or empirical testing of reality allowed, because that is the way Limbaugh has set it up. A one man show, for an egotistical windbag while he laughs all the way to the bank.

As a Liberal, its painful to listen to Limbaugh as his logic is non existent, but still, I do not believe in censorship so I have mixed feelings about the fairness doctrine being applied, even for idiots.

As it is, a very large part of the GOP has rejected Limbaugh, and if Limbaugh wants to be king of the lunatic fringe, he has too many rivals and friends to rest easy.

 

[JSt0rm]

Let me just say i'm not for this fairness doctrine. I mean I've never listened to Rush before so I don't know the kind of shit he is spewing but I say let him spew it until somebody gets violent because of what he tells them. At that point all bets are off. Honestly the kind of people that listen to that kind of dribble aren't going to make a difference in the world anyhow.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: eskimospy
Hey look its the weekly fairness doctrine thread! Call me when Obama supports it, or when a bill containing it passes either house of Congress. I'll be waiting.

Better yet, I'll finish off the thread for you guys:

Q: LIBRULZ WANT THE FAIRNESS DOCTREIN, FREE SPEECH UNLESS THEY DISAGREE WITH IT AMIRITE?

A: Just because a few people support it doesn't mean it's going to pass, and Obama doesn't support it.

Q: How do you know he doesn't support it? He said he was going to take public money in the campaign and then he didn't.

A: /facepalm

Maybe you can make up a list of everything the right is allowed to discuss here so the mods can sticky it. I'd hate for you to have to continue sifting through all of these threads that you don't approve of.

 

[JSt0rm]

Originally posted by: JD50
Maybe you can make up a list of everything the right is allowed to discuss here so the mods can sticky it. I'd hate for you to have to continue sifting through all of these threads that you don't approve of.

I could be wrong here but I don't think the issue is discussion. I think the issue is making a statement as to what the other side thinks that really has no base in reality. It could also be the funny little one liner "change we can believe in" or "but the messiah" type lines. These things don't lend to the discussion.

 

[AndrewR]

Wait a minute...would this put NPR off the air?? :thumbsup:

 

[Socio]

Originally posted by: AndrewR
People don't want liberal radio (as evidenced by the lack of listeners despite multiple attempts to start it), yet some in Congress want to mandate its existence. If it's so necessary and so in demand, why did Air America not succeed? This kind of government meddling in the marketplace is ridiculous.

If there are barriers to entry, then lift them. Air America didn't seem to have a barrier to entry, however; it just failed commercially. I don't get it.

Neither do I if people wanted to listen to liberal radio shows, ratings would mandate them but they do not simply because their message is wrong and no one wants to hear it!

That is what the likes of Pelosi and Reed just can?t get through their thick heads; no sane person wants to listen to views like theirs. Instead they want to try and shove their views down everyone?s throat with this doctrine.

 

[CPA]

And to think almost all of the ATOT Obamasiah supporters said this legislation would never come to life. Misled again.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Originally posted by: JSt0rm01

Originally posted by: JD50
Maybe you can make up a list of everything the right is allowed to discuss here so the mods can sticky it. I'd hate for you to have to continue sifting through all of these threads that you don't approve of.

I could be wrong here but I don't think the issue is discussion. I think the issue is making a statement as to what the other side thinks that really has no base in reality. It could also be the funny little one liner "change we can believe in" or "but the messiah" type lines. These things don't lend to the discussion.

A powerful politican expresses his intent during a CNN interview to introduce FD legislation later this year. THIS is the basis of discussion in this thread.

Some people don't like Hinchey's stated plans to introduce this legislation and voice their opinion. But...now we have some other people here who don't like this particular group of people voicing their opinion and want them to STFU...the very thing that FD is all about...silencing people who happen to disagree with you. The parallels are striking.

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, face it, you are wrong on this. It doesn't matter if they are assholes, it doesn't matter if you don't agree with one word that comes out of Rush's, Cannity's, or Savage's mouth, the fact that a government agency is going to dictate what is on the radio should scare the bejeesus out of you.

 

[fskimospy]

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: eskimospy
Hey look its the weekly fairness doctrine thread! Call me when Obama supports it, or when a bill containing it passes either house of Congress. I'll be waiting.

Better yet, I'll finish off the thread for you guys:

Q: LIBRULZ WANT THE FAIRNESS DOCTREIN, FREE SPEECH UNLESS THEY DISAGREE WITH IT AMIRITE?

A: Just because a few people support it doesn't mean it's going to pass, and Obama doesn't support it.

Q: How do you know he doesn't support it? He said he was going to take public money in the campaign and then he didn't.

A: /facepalm

Maybe you can make up a list of everything the right is allowed to discuss here so the mods can sticky it. I'd hate for you to have to continue sifting through all of these threads that you don't approve of.

Maybe instead of replying to ongoing threads you should make a new thread saying the exact same thing 2-3 times a week. Furthermore, it should be considered breaking news when any one of the five hundred and thirty five members of Congress comes out in support of an idea. Hopefully we will have dozens if not hundreds of these threads in the coming days. When confronted with the fact that you have mentioned no supporting legislation with any remote possibility of passage even through the legislature, much less the executive which has explicitly stated its opposition, this should be ignored and another thread generated. For all these reasons, nobody should make fun of someone for repeatedly doing this.

Oh, and CPA: since this legislation has 'come to life' surely you can point me to the House or Senate resolution where this is under consideration, along with a voting schedule on it, and if you're really nice some sort of proof that it would have anywhere close to enough votes to pass. I'll be waiting.

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: brandonbull

Originally posted by: MotF Bane

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: dphantom

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Muzzling right winged talk radio is like muzzling the Hitler movement or inoculating the public against polio. It feeds a sickness that needs to be destroyed. It preys on the insane making them sicker.

Well, we now know what the leftists want, a people who are allowed to think and express thoughts in only the approved manner - approved by the left.

Last I heard, we called that censorship. Something protected under the 1st amendment.

You don't like what conservative talk radio has to say, tune in to NPR or Air America.

I want you to be able to express any view you like, exactly like, or almost so, anyway, as you can here. All I want is that there be no single voice of insanity broadcasting to millions and millions of people. Rush Limpbrow is a piece of shit. He can say whatever he likes as far as I car, but he has to have somebody there with alternate views to round out, and file off his insanity. He is a fucking turd and a liar and is responsible for great disaster in America. He is a disease. I want him to broadcast along with penicillin. Prevent calls from being screened or him having control of the mike. Fairness is what I ask for.

Remember the real function of that asshole is to deliver a bunch of uncritical fools into the hands of advertisers. People who buy into Rush will buy anything.

By the way, NPR has a huge conservative audience as many conservatives are intelligent human beings. NPR gets as many complaints about being to the left as it does to the right. It's folk who are extreme but fancy themselves normal who cause this.

Moonie, have you heard of the First Amendment? Why do you hate the Constitution?

Because he is one of those traitors that likes to give themselves labels such as "Liberals","Democrats","The Left","The Right","Conservatives","Republicans",etc instead of Americans. They love to label themselves as a group/party and then proceed to destroy American values all in the name of their stupid group/party.

If lefty-traitors don't won't the righty-traitors to dominate the radio stations, then stop being a bunch of slick-haired, used carsalesmen, elites and put someone that is entertaining.

No, hate radio does not appeal to the left. We are people of greater understanding. Hate radio is for psychopaths full of anger and spite, little failure people clinging to the guns and Bibles, who are full of vindictiveness and venom. The left doesn't need to go down that path because they are progressive and up with the times. Hate radio is for those stuck in the past. All that is needed is for there to be opposing views aired alongside their shit and the stink of this sickness will reveal itself even to the morons that now listen. Light is the answer to darkness. Darkness is the absence of light.

Are you f'in serious?

All hail moonie and his superiority.