The EPA hates America.

[Anarchist420]

Obama asserts the right of the EPA to perform sick experiments on Americans (link).

What good could possibly come of those experiments?

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This is a reason as to why we need to restore the Articles of Confederation.[/FONT]

 

[Incorruptible]

Excellent thread OP!:thumbsup:

That pos obama can go screw himself for doing this. pos obama and the EPA have no right to do this and once again are violating the liberty of Americans.

This is just another reason to end the EPA

 

[CrackRabbit]

Excellent thread OP!:thumbsup:

That pos obama can go screw himself for doing this. pos obama and the EPA have no right to do this and once again are violating the liberty of Americans.

This is just another reason to end the EPA

From the website:

Steve Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and is the author of “Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them”

That's an unbiased source for sure!

​

 

[waggy]

wait..that's fucked up if true.

 

[MovingTarget]

Coming from a city that meets the EPA's clean air requirements for the first time in thirty years, the thread title is a crock. The EPA hates America by making us breathe easier everyday. So yeah....it hates America....let's go with that. Wouldnt' want to distract you from your narrative...

 

[Nemesis 1]

Kinda explains these mass shootings doesn't it . Trust this gooberment would be insanity

 

[Nemesis 1]

Coming from a city that meets the EPA's clean air requirements for the first time in thirty years, the thread title is a crock. The EPA hates America by making us breathe easier everyday. So yeah....it hates America....let's go with that. Wouldnt' want to distract you from your narrative...

Tell us all about it .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ucETzUJ8_w

 

[0___________0]

EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, moreover, has testified in Congress that particulate matter causes about 1 of every 4 deaths in America.

For reals? I find that hard to believe.

 

[K1052]

Google the "American Tradition Institute".

Couldn't possibly be a shady front for well finaced business interests looking to slow environmental regulation.....

The available info about the experiments being done is pretty thin from reputable sources. I'll go out on a limb and say that the EPA isn't trying to murder people.

 

[thraashman]

So am I the only one that tracked down and read the legal filing that explained the study? The exposure only occurs after both oral and written informed consent of those involved and is equivalent to smoking 5/1000 of a cigarette one time or the equivalent they'd be exposed to over the course of one normal day of the ambient air in the environment they live in.

 

[bradley]

Plenty of 9/11 first responders died at the hands of the EPA, so it's certainly plausible.

 

[PhatoseAlpha]

So exactly which of the guys flying the planes do you propose was in the EPA?

 

[bradley]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_arising_from_the_September_11_attacks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health..._EPA_deceptions_about_Ground_Zero_air_quality

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ll-waiting-on-aid-2-years-after-obama-signed/

 

[thraashman]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_arising_from_the_September_11_attacks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health..._EPA_deceptions_about_Ground_Zero_air_quality

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ll-waiting-on-aid-2-years-after-obama-signed/

That's an inherent problem when you let an agency designed to protect the health interests of the public be run by Republicans. Good thing now it's not.

 

[PhatoseAlpha]

Yeah. All a pretty clear "Caused by planes crashing into buildings". Certainly about six orders of magnitude below "Killed by EPA".

 

[bradley]

That's an inherent problem when you let an agency designed to protect the health interests of the public be run by Republicans. Good thing now it's not.

I don't believe in political parties and certainly have no love for Nixon. Did the EPA protect the 9/11 first responders? The answer is most likely, no, they placed them in harm's way.

 

[Nemesis 1]

I don't believe in political parties and certainly have no love for Nixon. Did the EPA protect the 9/11 first responders? The answer is most likely, no, they placed them in harm's way.

Thats really not the correct way to view it . The real question is why were those building still filled with asbestos. The schools were all cleaned out well befor 2001 . Why wasn't the expensive clean up done already per law. Thats the real question.I had A neighbor pulling off his slate siding . So I walked over looked at it , I stopped him cold . I said you either stop right now or I am calling the cops , He said can do my own siding , I said these have asbestos in them . and no you can't . He continued. I called the cops . The cops stopped him cold they explained to him why and how to get it properly done. It cost big bucks to get rid of that crap and removing . Needles to say he hasn't touched the house since hasn't spoken to me either.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Sounds like the OP and the writer is actually the ones hating americans.

 

[FaaR]

I don't believe in political parties and certainly have no love for Nixon. Did the EPA protect the 9/11 first responders? The answer is most likely, no, they placed them in harm's way.

Ok, so in the space of a couple posts you went from the EPA killed 9/11 first responders, to the EPA placed them in harm's way. Next, will you say the EPA may possibly have caused light headaches in first responders?

Anyway, I'd like to know what sort of logic you apply to blame injury/deaths on the EPA rather than on the terrorists that caused the buildings to collapse. Also, what shit you've been smoking whilst thinking up said garbage.

I swear, I didn't think you could actually come up with stuff like this even if you tried, but paranoid ridiculous americans never cease to amaze... :lol:

 

[soulcougher73]

More faux noise from the right.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Obama asserts the right of the EPA to perform sick experiments on Americans (link).

What good could possibly come of those experiments?

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This is a reason as to why we need to restore the Articles of Confederation.[/FONT]

I'm curious why the writer says the "Obama EPA" but then a few paragraphs later says that the EPA has been conducting the experiments for 10 years. Last I knew Obama has been in office for only 4 years... maybe it just seems like 10 to you nutters.

 

[glenn1]

Obama asserts the right of the EPA to perform sick experiments on Americans (link).

What good could possibly come of those experiments?

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This is a reason as to why we need to restore the Articles of Confederation.[/FONT]

This entire article reminds me of the "Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide" site, but written by someone less funny who actually thinks it's true.

On an unrelated note, can anyone explain why anarchists and crazy-ass conspiracy theories seem to always go hand in hand?

 

[(sic)Klown12]

On an unrelated note, can anyone explain why anarchists and crazy-ass conspiracy theories seem to always go hand in hand?

Misery loves company?

 

[Jeff7]

From the website:

Steve Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and is the author of “Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them”

That's an unbiased source for sure!

​

And yet that site doesn't seem to have anything dedicated to chemtrails. Astonishing.

The best evidence that contrails are intentionally harmful is the brain damage found in people who think that they are chemtrails.

This entire article reminds me of the "Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide" site, but written by someone less funny who actually thinks it's true.

On an unrelated note, can anyone explain why anarchists and crazy-ass conspiracy theories seem to always go hand in hand?

Maybe just something about the mindset. You've got that elsewhere, too - seemingly different behaviors often being found together.

 

[Theb]

M-O-O-N that spells Articles of Confederation.