- Jun 2, 2005
- 13,365
- 16
- 0
Elop: but they *need* us...
Even if he were right, that a third choice will be wanted, Blackberry is in 3rd place, not Windows. It would be good news for RIM, not Nokia.
Now maybe if a fourth choice was wanted...
Elop: but they *need* us...
Even if he were right, that a third choice will be wanted, Blackberry is in 3rd place, not Windows. It would be good news for RIM, not Nokia.
Now maybe if a fourth choice was wanted...
The thing about Verizon is that they had a WELL KNOWN rift with Microsoft stemming from the Kin fiasco. Nokia should have known that Verizon would be slow to adopt windows phones. Going with WP7 exclusively was the worst decision possible.
It was folly to just focus on Windows Phone 7. This is what happens when you put all your eggs in one basket. What they should have done was make both WP7 and Android phones. This exclusivity didn't get them anything, especially now that Microsoft is making their own hardware.
android would have meant instant success. a new design like lumia running android would have sold very well. it was stupid to tied their entire business to an os that has zero market share at the time and to only one carrier
No it would of not the only android phone maker making money is Samsung. Nokia phones are the opposite of the samsung phones that are dominating the android market. They got a billion dollars to make exclusive phones for MS. You really think they would of sold enough beefed up 800s and 900s against the GS3 to net a billion dollars?
If they were entering the Android market it would not have been now, months after the GS3 release. It would have been way earlier, and if Nokia was smart they could definitely avoid the mistakes that HTC and Moto both made.
Fact is they took the money and have not been successful. It's beyond ridiculous that Microsoft + Nokia couldn't beat the old Windows Mobile in marketshare.
No it would of not the only android phone maker making money is Samsung. Nokia phones are the opposite of the samsung phones that are dominating the android market. They got a billion dollars to make exclusive phones for MS. You really think they would of sold enough beefed up 800s and 900s against the GS3 to net a billion dollars?
MS may have an almost endless supply of money, but Nokia doesn't. MS may be making their own smartphone if rumors are to be believed. I don't think that would help Nokia.1 company can endlessly pump cash into their OS.
1 company has only a few quarters of reserve cash left.
Nokia has already had Windows 7 phones out, which was suppose to be their salvation, and they failed miserably. What reason is there to believe their Windows 8 phones are going to do any better?1 company has shown off several phones that you can soon buy.
1 company still is showing off prototypes.
No it would of not the only android phone maker making money is Samsung. Nokia phones are the opposite of the samsung phones that are dominating the android market. They got a billion dollars to make exclusive phones for MS. You really think they would of sold enough beefed up 800s and 900s against the GS3 to net a billion dollars?