The duplicitous Bush Administration

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Vice President Dick Cheney bitterly complains that national security leaks are endangering America. Unless, of course, he's doing the leaking, tapping Scooter Libby to reveal national security information to punish a political critic.

President Bush says he will not talk about specific security threats to America. Unless, of course, he needs to talk about a specific threat to Los Angeles to confuse the public and gain some cheap political advantage.

The White House says it has done everything possible to protect the homeland. Unless, of course, it hasn't. Then it can lie to hide the callous portrait of Incurious George in Crawford as New Orleans drowned.

The attorney general can claim that torture and warrantless wiretapping are legal, and can mislead Congress. Unless, of course, enough Republicans stand up and say, as Arlen Specter told The Washington Post, that if that lickspittle lawyer thinks all this is legal, "he's smoking Dutch Cleanser."

The president doesn't know the Indian Taker Jack Abramoff. Unless, of course, W. has met with him a dozen times, invited him to Crawford and joked with him about his kids.

The Bushies can continue to claim that the invasion of Iraq was justified because Saddam was a threat to our security. Unless, of course, he wasn't, and the Cheney cabal was simply abusing the trust of Americans to push a wild-eyed political scheme.

It would be funny if it weren't true. Another thing that comes to mind is Bush commenting that America is "addicted to oil! when he and his friends are the ones reaping HUGE profits from the raping of poor people who must buy gas to get to their service jobs.
Cheney complaining about security leaks is hysterical as well. He outs a CIA agent, later claims he was legally justified in doing so, and then complains about leaks.
They've restored dignity to Washington all right.... :disgust:

More here
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Cheney had the gall the other day to state that the leaks about the warrantless wiretapping and the CIA secret prisons caused damage to national security.


Odd he didn't mention the outing of Plame and the front company, Brewster Jennings.



Cheney is a TREASONOUS POS and deserves to die a traitor's death.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: arsbanned
Vice President Dick Cheney bitterly complains that national security leaks are endangering America. Unless, of course, he's doing the leaking, tapping Scooter Libby to reveal national security information to punish a political critic.

President Bush says he will not talk about specific security threats to America. Unless, of course, he needs to talk about a specific threat to Los Angeles to confuse the public and gain some cheap political advantage.

The White House says it has done everything possible to protect the homeland. Unless, of course, it hasn't. Then it can lie to hide the callous portrait of Incurious George in Crawford as New Orleans drowned.

The attorney general can claim that torture and warrantless wiretapping are legal, and can mislead Congress. Unless, of course, enough Republicans stand up and say, as Arlen Specter told The Washington Post, that if that lickspittle lawyer thinks all this is legal, "he's smoking Dutch Cleanser."

The president doesn't know the Indian Taker Jack Abramoff. Unless, of course, W. has met with him a dozen times, invited him to Crawford and joked with him about his kids.

The Bushies can continue to claim that the invasion of Iraq was justified because Saddam was a threat to our security. Unless, of course, he wasn't, and the Cheney cabal was simply abusing the trust of Americans to push a wild-eyed political scheme.

It would be funny if it weren't true. Another thing that comes to mind is Bush commenting that America is "addicted to oil! when he and his friends are the ones reaping HUGE profits from the raping of poor people who must buy gas to get to their service jobs.
Cheney complaining about security leaks is hysterical as well. He outs a CIA agent, later claims he was legally justified in doing so, and then complains about leaks.
They've restored dignity to Washington all right.... :disgust:

More here

You forgot to mention my sig :D
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,888
11,574
136
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: arsbanned
Vice President Dick Cheney bitterly complains that national security leaks are endangering America. Unless, of course, he's doing the leaking, tapping Scooter Libby to reveal national security information to punish a political critic.

President Bush says he will not talk about specific security threats to America. Unless, of course, he needs to talk about a specific threat to Los Angeles to confuse the public and gain some cheap political advantage.

The White House says it has done everything possible to protect the homeland. Unless, of course, it hasn't. Then it can lie to hide the callous portrait of Incurious George in Crawford as New Orleans drowned.

The attorney general can claim that torture and warrantless wiretapping are legal, and can mislead Congress. Unless, of course, enough Republicans stand up and say, as Arlen Specter told The Washington Post, that if that lickspittle lawyer thinks all this is legal, "he's smoking Dutch Cleanser."

The president doesn't know the Indian Taker Jack Abramoff. Unless, of course, W. has met with him a dozen times, invited him to Crawford and joked with him about his kids.

The Bushies can continue to claim that the invasion of Iraq was justified because Saddam was a threat to our security. Unless, of course, he wasn't, and the Cheney cabal was simply abusing the trust of Americans to push a wild-eyed political scheme.

It would be funny if it weren't true. Another thing that comes to mind is Bush commenting that America is "addicted to oil! when he and his friends are the ones reaping HUGE profits from the raping of poor people who must buy gas to get to their service jobs.
Cheney complaining about security leaks is hysterical as well. He outs a CIA agent, later claims he was legally justified in doing so, and then complains about leaks.
They've restored dignity to Washington all right.... :disgust:

More here

You forgot to mention my sig :D

Wanted, dead or alive.
 

themusgrat

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2005
1,408
0
0
Wow, another Bush-Bashing thread. How hard did you have to look to get that quote? I thought most ignorant articles like that had already been taken and posted.
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
Originally posted by: arsbanned
Vice President Dick Cheney bitterly complains that national security leaks are endangering America. Unless, of course, he's doing the leaking, tapping Scooter Libby to reveal national security information to punish a political critic.

President Bush says he will not talk about specific security threats to America. Unless, of course, he needs to talk about a specific threat to Los Angeles to confuse the public and gain some cheap political advantage.

The White House says it has done everything possible to protect the homeland. Unless, of course, it hasn't. Then it can lie to hide the callous portrait of Incurious George in Crawford as New Orleans drowned.

The attorney general can claim that torture and warrantless wiretapping are legal, and can mislead Congress. Unless, of course, enough Republicans stand up and say, as Arlen Specter told The Washington Post, that if that lickspittle lawyer thinks all this is legal, "he's smoking Dutch Cleanser."

The president doesn't know the Indian Taker Jack Abramoff. Unless, of course, W. has met with him a dozen times, invited him to Crawford and joked with him about his kids.

The Bushies can continue to claim that the invasion of Iraq was justified because Saddam was a threat to our security. Unless, of course, he wasn't, and the Cheney cabal was simply abusing the trust of Americans to push a wild-eyed political scheme.

It would be funny if it weren't true. Another thing that comes to mind is Bush commenting that America is "addicted to oil! when he and his friends are the ones reaping HUGE profits from the raping of poor people who must buy gas to get to their service jobs.
Cheney complaining about security leaks is hysterical as well. He outs a CIA agent, later claims he was legally justified in doing so, and then complains about leaks.
They've restored dignity to Washington all right.... :disgust:

More here

Please don't post stuff from the huffingtonpost.com -- it's obviously liberal garbage.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Don't forget the ports!

Gotta keep the country safe while at the same time selling control of the ports out to the terrorists!
 

themusgrat

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2005
1,408
0
0
No one in Wahington understands anything about ports. To them, it is simply an industry to tax and gain control through.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
What was the purpose of this thread? I read all that and it reminded me of the same lines used here each day. Maybe the author of that article visits these forums?

Also, is there any definitive proof that Bush knows Abramoff? Bush received contributions from many people but he doesn't return their calls unlike some Demoncats. Bush has his favorites, but I doubt he kisses butt.

Another Bush-bashing thread that really accomplishes nothing but unite you Bush-bashers.

Oh and if this website is "treasure" for you guys, then for many right wingers, newsmax and WND serve the same purpose. If you want to actually show that you're better than the right wingers, why not find better sources of info?
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Isn't Dick Cheney just the worst example of every hateful, spiteful old man you ever met?
A real life Grinch.
A real life Marley.
Bah Humbug!
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Oh and if this website is "treasure" for you guys, then for many right wingers, newsmax and WND serve the same purpose. If you want to actually show that you're better than the right wingers, why not find better sources of info?
Did you look at the source? Its from the NY Times. Huffington Post just reposted it.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: raildogg
Oh and if this website is "treasure" for you guys, then for many right wingers, newsmax and WND serve the same purpose. If you want to actually show that you're better than the right wingers, why not find better sources of info?
Did you look at the source? Its from the NY Times. Huffington Post just reposted it.

The Huffington Post is no better than the right wing websites.

Also, it is from an op-ed, it is not a news story and there are no sources.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Full Op-Ed for those interested.
Vice President Dick Cheney bitterly complains that national security leaks are endangering America. Unless, of course, he's doing the leaking, tapping Scooter Libby to reveal national security information to punish a political critic.

President Bush says he will not talk about specific security threats to America. Unless, of course, he needs to talk about a specific threat to Los Angeles to confuse the public and gain some cheap political advantage.

The White House says it has done everything possible to protect the homeland. Unless, of course, it hasn't. Then it can lie to hide the callous portrait of Incurious George in Crawford as New Orleans drowned.

The attorney general can claim that torture and warrantless wiretapping are legal, and can mislead Congress. Unless, of course, enough Republicans stand up and say, as Arlen Specter told The Washington Post, that if that lickspittle lawyer thinks all this is legal, "he's smoking Dutch Cleanser."

The president doesn't know the Indian Taker Jack Abramoff. Unless, of course, W. has met with him a dozen times, invited him to Crawford and joked with him about his kids.

The Bushies can continue to claim that the invasion of Iraq was justified because Saddam was a threat to our security. Unless, of course, he wasn't, and the Cheney cabal was simply abusing the trust of Americans to push a wild-eyed political scheme.

At the Bush White House, the mere evocation of the word "terror" justifies breaking any law, contravening any convention, despoiling any ideal, electing any Republican and brushing off any failure to govern.

Asked yesterday by Senator Susan Collins why the administration had reacted in slo-mo on Katrina, with "people dying, people waiting to be rescued," Michael Brown replied that if FEMA had declared that a terrorist had blown up the 17th Street Canal levee, "then everybody would have jumped all over that and been trying to do everything they could."

Instead of just going after the 9/11 fiends, as W. promised with his bullhorn, the president and Vice President Strangelove have cynically played the terror card to accrue power and sidestep blame. They have twisted our values, mismanaged crises, fueled fundamentalist successes and violence around the world, and magnified a clash of civilizations.

It used to take an Israeli incursion to inflame the Arab world. Now all it takes is a cartoon in Denmark.

W. and Vice have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars, turning Iraq into a terrorist training ground, leaving the 9/11 villains at large, and letting cronies and losers botch the job of homeland security.

Brownie, one of the biggest boneheads in U.S. history, considered the homeland security chief, Michael Chertoff, so useless that he deliberately didn't call him right away about the suffering in New Orleans.

"The culture was such that I didn't think that would have been effective and would have exacerbated the problem, quite frankly," Brownie told the Republican senator Bob Bennett, who called the statement "staggering." A telephone call to his boss, Brownie said, "would have wasted my time."

The doofus who frittered away lives e-mailing colleagues about being a "fashion god" and wondering how he looked on television may have just been engaged in self-protective spin. Or has the Homeland Security Department simply created another set of paralyzing turf battles?

The most dysfunctional man in government is calling the government dysfunctional.

W.'s sophomoric "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job" line makes even Brownie cringe. "Unfortunately," the former FEMA chief complained, "he called me 'Brownie' at the wrong time. Thanks a lot, sir."

In the new Foreign Affairs, Paul Pillar, who was a senior C.I.A. official overseeing Middle East intelligence assessments until October, says the obvious conclusion that should have been drawn from the intelligence on Iraq was that war was unnecessary. He says the White House "went to war without requesting ? and evidently without being influenced by ? any strategic-level intelligence assessments on any aspect of Iraq."

He calls the relationship between the intelligence community and the policy makers ? you guessed it ? politicized, damaged by bureaucratic rivalries and dysfunctional.

A final absurd junction of dysfunction was reached on Wednesday, when Republican Party leaders awarded Tom DeLay with a seat on the Appropriations subcommittee overseeing the Justice Department, which is investigating Jack Abramoff, including his connections to Tom DeLay.

Perfect.
EDIT: Fixed spacing.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
What would lead someone to NOT believe this was all true... is it all the Honor and Dignity in thw Black House?
 

themusgrat

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2005
1,408
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
What would lead someone to NOT believe this was all true... is it all the Honor and Dignity in thw Black House?

If this were objective and unbiased, it would not be an opinion piece.

I am not supporting the White House in everything, just not wasting my time wishing for something that will never be. Besides, they do lots of good. They have the room to make a few mistakes, though one could argue that they have made more that a few.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I just thank my lucky stars I am not in a group that Bush has praised.

Because sure as shooting--Federal funding cuts follows.

On 911 he praised the first responders--days later he is cuttin their funds

Same for the military---but for the GI its cutting their benefits, health care, and pensions.