• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The drought... 2 problems, one easy, the other not so much

Muse

Muse

Lifer
#1: How many molecules of water are in 1 gallon (at, say, 70 degrees F, since the temperature will affect this, so maybe make it "approximate")?

#2: They are fighting it out politically, the super big/long oil pipeline. Why can't they/we eventually transport huge quantities of water (i.e. "sufficient" quantities) by pipelines (or canals) from areas that have abundant rainfall to areas that usually have relatively insufficient rainfall (at least Utah, Arizona, Nevada, California)?

It seems like Washington and even Oregon are drenched for much of the year, can't we get a lot of that water down to California? I haven't seen/heard discussion of this, so it's obviously difficult, but if drought conditions worsen, is it possible that this could be considered? I read something recently that scientists have determined that droughts of 200 years have occurred in this region. A severe drought of 200 years could wipe out the region, essentially, unless new methods are employed to provide water by means other than local rainfall (desalination or transport). I think I have seen discussion of hauling fresh water, dragging huge water-filled balloons behind ships! Please discuss.
 
Last edited:
Only navigable water is controlled by the Feds. All of the water, the water that is used for consumption is controlled locally. So, unless you have those states and local authorities agreeable to providing their water, California is out of luck in getting it from anywhere but their backyard.
 
If water was not piped down to socal it would not have been able to support the population there millions of people ago. Issues like this arise when a desert becomes the second largest city in the country.
 
Keep watering your lawns. The water cycle will soon mean water for everyone!

🙄

(that has never worked and will never work because you have to can not accumulate enough to be of any use......STOP watering your lawns and let the billion dollar almond farmers owned by the pension funds waste it all)
 
FelixDeCat said:
Keep watering your lawns. The water cycle will soon mean water for everyone!

:roll:
Click to expand...

depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.
 
Muse said:
#1: How many molecules of water are in 1 gallon (at, say, 70 degrees F, since the temperature will affect this, so maybe make it "approximate")?

#2: They are fighting it out politically, the super big/long oil pipeline. Why can't they/we eventually transport huge quantities of water (i.e. "sufficient" quantities) by pipelines (or canals) from areas that have abundant rainfall to areas that usually have relatively insufficient rainfall (at least Utah, Arizona, Nevada, California)?

It seems like Washington and even Oregon are drenched for much of the year, can't we get a lot of that water down to California? I haven't seen/heard discussion of this, so it's obviously difficult, but if drought conditions worsen, is it possible that this could be considered? I read something recently that scientists have determined that droughts of 200 years have occurred in this region. A severe drought of 200 years could wipe out the region, essentially, unless new methods are employed to provide water by means other than local rainfall (desalination or transport). I think I have seen discussion of hauling fresh water, dragging huge water-filled balloons behind ships! Please discuss.
Click to expand...


CA needs to build desalinization plants and sell water to cities. You are sitting by an OCEAN of water for Heaven's sake! D:
 
rednas said:
depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.
Click to expand...

HOA fines have been stopped by the State but local city fines might still be issued. Thats the stupid part.
 
Why should Washington and Oregon alter their ecosystems by pumping water down to California?

California needs to either stop trying to turn a desert into a roofless greenhouse or start focusing on desalinization powered by relatively clean methods such as fission.

I support the second, but I don't see it happening.
 
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.
 
Last edited:
John Connor said:
California has plenty of water it's the dumb fuck politicians that messed it up.
Click to expand...


you are right. But the water just happens to be found hundreds of miles from where most of the people who consume it live. Also, lots of water is used for farming.
 
John Connor said:
We need a new political party; i.e The Common Sense party.

But, but desalination plants contribute to "global warming."

Here's some crap to read. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-impacts-of-relying-on-desalination/


Next thing you know they will say desalination plants are killing endangered fish.

More BS. http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Desalination-plants-a-pricey-option-if-drought-5239096.php

Run 'em on natural gas!
Click to expand...

Everyone who either lives in California or has lived in California knows that 'common sense' is something that is severely lacking in the people who are in political office.
 
rednas said:
depending what city one lives in southern California you might be obligated to keep your lawn watered or get fined. So stupid. They also make it illegal to replace ones lawn with something that does not have to be watered.
Click to expand...

That pipe line destroyed the cities at the source. When it was built there were bombing to destroy it among other things.
 
DrDoug said:
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.
Click to expand...

Look at the costs of transporting huge volumes of gasoline and oil. That's like 1-2 gallons per person per day. You're talking about hundreds of times the capacity of oil transport.
 
DrDoug said:
I recently read that water consumption in one of the richest counties in CA was an average of 570+ gallons per day per person. In surrounding areas it was still hitting 300-400 gallons per day per person.

No wonder they are running out of water.
Click to expand...
I don't know where they get those figures, but in the heat of summer (when I water my vegetables) I've never been into triple figures in my gallons/day. Maybe they are figuring water consumption of a county as a whole divided by its population. Industry/government would use a big chunk.
 
Last edited:
John Connor said:
California has plenty of water it's the dumb fuck politicians that messed it up.
Click to expand...
I don't know, man, you should do more research before saying that. I'm not saying that politicians haven't fucked things up, but the region is arid. Read this:

Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water
imagoon said:
That pipe line destroyed the cities at the source. When it was built there were bombing to destroy it among other things.
Click to expand...
That story is elegantly related in the linked book.

rednas said:
you are right. But the water just happens to be found hundreds of miles from where most of the people who consume it live. Also, lots of water is used for farming.
Click to expand...
In recent memory, there's not been near enough water to supply California's agriculture to anywhere near the tune they want to use.
DrPizza said:
Look at the costs of transporting huge volumes of gasoline and oil. That's like 1-2 gallons per person per day. You're talking about hundreds of times the capacity of oil transport.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I figured that the difference in scale there is what distinguishes transport by pipeline of water from that of oil.

Still, presumably the technical/industrial capabilities of our civilization are going to increment, but the need for water remains, arguably increases. Droughts will happen regardless, potentially extended droughts of up to 200 years. The current situation IMO highlights the need to think big going forward on this issue. This problem won't disappear by virtue of a 3 year period of substantial rainfall, which is what people are praying for. They're going to have to plan something going forward.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Muse said:
I don't know where they get those figures, but in the heat of summer (when I water my vegetables) I've never been into triple figures in my gallons/day. Maybe they are figuring water consumption of a county as a whole divided by its population. Industry/government would use a big chunk.
Click to expand...

Rancho Santa Fe, 600 gallons per person per day. Calculated by 'water used in homes' / 'number of residents', so omits industrial, commercial, agricultural.
 
It's funny, isn't the overwhelming majority of bottled water in this country coming from California and shipped out across the country?
 
3/4 of Oregon is dry high desert by the way.

The rest that get's lots of rain, they are also always fighting for water rights too. And there are still some limits on how much water farmers can use. Sure there is a lot of rain but that rain made rivers and streams that needs to support the ecosystems for. If you suck it dry or lower it significantly then you destroy that. The salmon and fish population in Oregon is always a concern too.

We already send fliipen California our Wind Power from all the windmills farms out here. California needs to get their own crap together. That state is a pile of crap mess, don't shovel it off on everyone else.
 
T9D said:
3/4 of Oregon is dry high desert by the way.

The rest that get's lots of rain, they are also always fighting for water rights too. And there are still some limits on how much water farmers can use. Sure there is a lot of rain but that rain made rivers and streams that needs to support the ecosystems for. If you suck it dry or lower it significantly then you destroy that. The salmon and fish population in Oregon is always a concern too.

We already send fliipen California our Wind Power from all the windmills farms out here. California needs to get their own crap together. That state is a pile of crap mess, don't shovel it off on everyone else.
Click to expand...
LOL. OK, here you go. Obviously, raiding OR for its water won't be easy, OK, probably impossible, they don't have enough even now.

I'm thinking way out in the future, not some 5 year plan to fix things.

Poking around this morning I found a book that I already put on hold at the library and I'm likely to buy:

Water 4.0: The Past, Present, and Future of the World's Most Vital Resource, by David Sedlak
 
Building a pipeline from Oregon or something to the SF Bay Delta would cost at least 50 billion dollars. Desal would cost at least 2 billion for each major city.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top