Sure, but being an uneducated manual laborer in today's world means you are most likely not going to be in the middle class, because of you, not immigrants and China.
The thread is beginning to resemble the "everything-you-say-bounces-off-me-and-sticks-on-you" of Trump's recent retorts to Hilly's public statements.
There has been a rural-urban contrast just for who dominates in registered voters. I'm hypothesizing that the mostly-all white cohort of Trump supporters have a distribution in a rural-to-urban gradient which declines as you move toward major market and break-of-bulk points, or from the country to the city. They're distributed across the spectrum, but differently.
The high-school-limited component merely correlates with the group. Among the more articulate in the Trump organization are his family, paid surrogates and possibly some "True Believers" who think they're great armchair political philosophers and otherwise want to "drown it an a bathtub." Where else does the Tea Party have to go?
To add a little ethnic profiling, Boris Epshteyn and Paul Manafort speak, behave or look like characters from the "Sopranos" or globally-linked persons-of-interest on a "Law and Order" episode. Every time Epshteyn pops up on the TV, I keep thinking either Brighton Beach or Little Italy. Of course he's "Boris" and "Epshteyn," so put your chips on squares accordingly.
But the racial animus has been just under the surface since 2010. Thus this obsession with "PC" in matters that Obama referred to as "impolite."
I suppose you could design a survey and take a large sample on the less fanciful aspects.
I can also give my thoughts about ordinary people in focus groups I'd seen on the tube for the last year. I'll hold on that. . . .