The delicious irony of banning books.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: dmens
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Rainsford
That's silly, you can't separate criticism of beliefs and criticism of an individual. For most people, Muslim or otherwise, their religion is a big part of who they are...saying that their religion is "wretched" implies the same about the individuals who practice it. And in any case, you're missing the bigger problem...Islam as dictated by the Koran is hardly unique among world religions, have you actually ever read the Bible? Yet you reserve you hatred for Islam alone, and despise the people who practice it and the people who defend the moderate Muslims.</end quote></div>

the supposed definition of islamophobia is prejudice and/or discrimination against muslims, but criticism of their system of beliefs in no way implies any such thing. it was their choice to revolve their lives around the religion, so how does that make the islamic beliefs so sacred they cannot be criticized? many of the tenets espoused in the koran are completely wretched, there is no doubt about it. it is up to the muslims themselves to decide what to make of it.

christianity is dictated by the bible? you obviously have no clue. the koran is considered by all muslims to be direct revelations from allah to mohammed, whereas most christians see the bible as a collection of moral stories. hence, the koran gives divine obligation to all kinds of atrocious behavior, whereas the bible does no such thing.

enough with your personal attacks. you simply assume i hate muslims because i find the islamic system of beliefs to be barbaric and tribal, and give everyone else a free pass. that's ridiculous. monotheists, christians included, have been responsible for many of history's greatest crimes. but zooming in on this day and age, using age-old christian atrocities to deflect and suppress criticism of islam is totally dishonest.</end quote></div>

You admit "most Christians" see the bible as morality plays, and not the actual word of god. And yet there is a small minority of fanatic extremists that believe every word in the bible is true (see Creationist Museum" thread.) So why is it so hard to understand that that same minority exists in Islam, those who think its god's will to kill? Clearly not all Muslims follow every tenet in the Koran, and not every tenet adhered to is interpreted the same way. That's why some Muslims have one wife, other's believe in polygamy. The Quran states something like "you must treat all your wives equally." Some Muslim philosophers have argued that since it is not possible to treat two people exactly equally, this passage must be interpreted to mean you can only have one wife. Others disagree and argue the plain meaning is obvious, that you can have multiple wives.

I understand one part of the Quran states something along the lines of "there is no worse enemy to the Muslim than the Jew." Now, I live in NYC and have Muslim friends. Clearly they don't believe every word of the Quran, or choose to ignore it, or rationalize around it. You can certainly criticise the parts of the Quran you disagree with, or criticise interpretations of passages you disagree with, but you certainly cannot claim that one billion people people practice a religion of hate. It would collapse unto itself.

Remember, the bible instructs us that menstruating women are unclean and must be kept apart for 7 days, or anyone they touch or anything they sit on becomes unclean and need be exiled. [Insert 'i dont trust anything that bleeds for days and doesn't die' joke here]
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Love him or hate him, Abu Bakar Bashir is a man to be respected, he doesn't BS you about the incompatibility of Islam Sharia law and the separation of religion and state by mincing words like the religious right do when they try to appear politically correct in front of the cameras and say something different in private.

Time will soon tell whether his no compromise with secularism version of Islam or M. R. Bawa Muhaiyaddeen version posted above will come to pass.



A chilling message for the infidels

Just six weeks before last Saturday's terrorist atrocity in Bali, in a jail cell in Jakarta, I interviewed Abu Bakar Bashir, the alleged spiritual leader of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), al-Qa'eda's main ally in the region, and the group on which western attention is focused in the hunt for culprits.

Bashir was celebrating the news that an Indonesian court had agreed to reduce his 30-month sentence for conspiracy in the 2002 Bali bombings by more than four months, meaning that he will soon walk free.

Ever since the first bombings, in which 202 people died, Indonesian authorities have been woolly in their response to terrorism for fear of alienating a largely anti-American population. Nothing illustrates this better than the appeal court's judgment on Bashir's early release - they took the decision even though he was implicated in a JI plot to overthrow Indonesia's previous government, and despite independent testimony from senior JI operatives in custody that he had approved the 2002 bombings.

At 66, Bashir is a lanky, bespectacled Hadrami, who, like Osama Bin Laden, traces his family back to the Hadramawt region of Yemen. Surrounded by acolytes - including known JI bombers - serving him dates, he answered questions with a strong voice and easy laugh.

Scott Atran: What are the conditions for Islam to be strong?


Abu Bakar Bashir: The infidel country must be visited and spied upon. If we don't come to them, they will persecute Islam. They will prevent non-Muslims converting.

SA: What can the West, especially the US, do to make the world more peaceful?
ABB: They have to stop fighting Islam. That's impossible because it is sunnatullah [destiny, a law of nature], as Allah has said in the Koran. If they want to have peace, they have to accept to be governed by Islam.
SA: What if they persist?
ABB: We'll keep fighting them and they'll lose. The batil [falsehood] will lose sooner or later. I sent a letter to Bush. I said that you'll lose and there is no point for you [to fight us]. This [concept] is found in the Koran.
SA: Have you met Osama Bin Laden?
ABB: No, no. I want to though. After my release, I hope I can meet him.
SA: Where will you find him?
ABB: If he still exists - but how could I? I have sympathy for his struggle. Osama is Allah's soldier. When I heard his story, I came to the conclusion that he's mujahid, a soldier of Allah.
SA: You will always be on his side?
ABB: His tactics and calculations may sometimes be wrong, he's an ordinary human being after all.?I hope I can meet Osama Bin Laden. I have sympathy for his struggle. Osama is Allah?s soldier? ordinary human being after all. I don't agree with all of his actions. Osama believes in total war. This concept I don't agree with. If this occurs in an Islamic country, the fitnah [discord] will be felt by Muslims. But to attack them in their country [America] is fine.
SA: So this fight will never end?
ABB: Never. This fight is compulsory. Muslims who don't hate America sin. What I mean by America is George Bush's regime. There is no iman [belief] if one doesn't hate America.
SA: How can the American regime and its policies change?
ABB: We'll see. As long as there is no intention to fight us and Islam continues to grow there can be peace. This is the doctrine of Islam. Islam can't be ruled by others. Allah's law must stand above human law. There is no [example] of Islam and infidels, the right and the wrong, living together in peace.










 

dmens

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,275
965
136
Originally posted by: sirjonk
You admit "most Christians" see the bible as morality plays, and not the actual word of god. And yet there is a small minority of fanatic extremists that believe every word in the bible is true (see Creationist Museum" thread.) So why is it so hard to understand that that same minority exists in Islam, those who think its god's will to kill? Clearly not all Muslims follow every tenet in the Koran, and not every tenet adhered to is interpreted the same way. That's why some Muslims have one wife, other's believe in polygamy. The Quran states something like "you must treat all your wives equally." Some Muslim philosophers have argued that since it is not possible to treat two people exactly equally, this passage must be interpreted to mean you can only have one wife. Others disagree and argue the plain meaning is obvious, that you can have multiple wives.

I understand one part of the Quran states something along the lines of "there is no worse enemy to the Muslim than the Jew." Now, I live in NYC and have Muslim friends. Clearly they don't believe every word of the Quran, or choose to ignore it, or rationalize around it. You can certainly criticise the parts of the Quran you disagree with, or criticise interpretations of passages you disagree with, but you certainly cannot claim that one billion people people practice a religion of hate. It would collapse unto itself.

Remember, the bible instructs us that menstruating women are unclean and must be kept apart for 7 days, or anyone they touch or anything they sit on becomes unclean and need be exiled. [Insert 'i dont trust anything that bleeds for days and doesn't die' joke here]

Because the bible doesn't tell christians to go kill the jews because the rocks said so, so even the nutjobs who follow the bible literally don't have any justification from "holy texts" to commit such acts. muslims on the other hand have plenty of dogmatic ammunition to justify just about any kind of atrocity they commit.

the fact that some muslims don't follow the koran literally is irrelevant. the very fact that the koran is held as god's own word means observant muslims are obliged to follow its every word. therefore, your muslim friends that choose to ignore the koran are simply non-observant, and the ones that rationalize around the objectionable suras are disingenuous. moreover, if the moderate muslims are truly a potent force within the islamic community, why don't they try to introduce their ideas into mainstream islam to reform it? instead, the historic centers of islamic study still spout extreme hatred on a daily basis and endorse all kinds of insanity.

islam isn't a religion of hate, it's a religion of hating non-muslims. why would it collapse because of that? if anything, that makes it a more potent force.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
It is similar to the people who foam about Michael Moore movies without seeing them.. they just repeat the propaganda on their "side" as if they saw it themselves.
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
That's the way it always is. I recall being in an Honors reading class in the 6th grade, and one of the parents from our church was meeting with my parents because they disapproved of the reading material. I brought out the book and asked if they had ever read it. An uncomfortable silence.... followed by a "get to your room."

My english teacher dropped All Quiet on the Western Front because of several parents objecting to its "violent nature." Ironically, we were permitted to read The Importance of Being Ernest in spite of the authors homosexual behaviors (although some parents, and kids didn't like the biography assignment where we learned about Wilde's homosexual tendencies and flirtings with underrage boys.)

The school I attend is a charter, btw.


Back on topic - yeah, this doesn't surprised me one bit. People tend to neglect just how islamic fundamentalism is sunk into the governments of the world.


And not just governments, but the universities as well. At UCI (university of California at Irvine) there is plenty of jewish harassment sourced from muslim groups. The reason these people go unpunished is because the senior professor of "international relations" is a muslim, who apparently has major financial backing from the country of Saudi Arabia.


The clout radical muslims have over western society is underappreciated and clearly needs more media attention.


Of course, that will just draw away from the theraputic criticism of those damn dirty Christians.
:D


I love the whole spreading democracy bit. If only we had democracy to spread.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Umm... I'm not sure how to respond to that. Wilde's extremely intelligent play on the nature of deceit and his real life homosexuality make for a quality education to those mature enough to understand it.
 

montag451

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,587
0
0
It was an extremely boring book.

Only the bits about Mohammed were quite well done - very reminiscent of the
'Peoples' Front of Judea' v 'Judean Peoples' Front'
(Monty Python)
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
The difference?

Writers can ridicule religion like Christianity without Christian religious 'leaders' declare death threat on them

Writers can ridicule Islam without religious leader ......................................................................